![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/img/house/lonewolf.png)
Banhammer Incoming
#681
Posted 28 May 2015 - 10:58 AM
Not to do what I have done
Spend your lives in sin and misery
In the House of the Rising Sun
Well, I got one foot on the platform
The other foot on the train
I'm goin' back to New Orleans
To wear that ball and chain
#682
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:00 AM
DaZur, on 27 May 2015 - 10:15 PM, said:
![:rolleyes:](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
I'm not sure why I'm entertaining this but off the top of my head I could name at least a half dozen online games that do not even allow multiple accounts to play through the same router access point.
In terms of legal responsibility and a wide variety of nefarious internet based offenses... It's a rare instance for the auditing agency to go any deeper than the external facing IP unless they are looking for possession of copyrighted materials, i.e. music, videos, leaked code etc...
Dazur, I apologize for my unit member behaviour. It is simply unacceptable. ACES have a code of conduct and strict policy about breaking the rules. As a unit leader, I promise you that I make poor decisions will be dealt with in accordance with the unit's rules and regulations.
Please don't judge about the unit by the behaviour of one person. We have already one member of our unit dragged through the mud. I can assure you that serious measures will be taken soon.
Once again, I apologize to everyone who has been affected by I make poor decisions, apparently he really does.
#683
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:01 AM
#684
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:03 AM
Seth Stin Exoría, on 28 May 2015 - 11:01 AM, said:
You should not be pissed off, it means that you are doing it right.
I would be more worried about NOT being called a cheater once in a while.
#685
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:04 AM
KHETTI, on 28 May 2015 - 10:17 AM, said:
Whats needed is an Appeals thread.
Basically the Accused gets 48 hrs to present anything that can prove their innocence, they can only log-in and post on that thread for said period.
PGI staff members are the only others allowed to post there, for the rest of us its read only, cases would be forbidden to be discussed elsewhere on the forum.
They can take their appeals up with PGI through support ... if they end up reinstated then a post to the forums will very quickly confirm that status and clear their name.
The only reason to have an appeals thread is to allow for the morbid curiosity of us folks in the peanut gallery. We have no data, no information, nothing to make a decision on regarding the behaviour of individual players ... their guilt or innocence.
Since PGI will NEVER post the reasons for the finding of cheating since it would offer insight into their methods usable by the folks who write the software ... an appeals thread would only serve as a platform for disseminating lies (or at best information that can not be substantiated) on the part of the folks who cheated. It would accomplish nothing. What good would impassioned public declarations of innocence by those found guilty of cheating do? They don't need to convince the peanut gallery ... they need to convince PGI that they were not cheating .. that there was some error in their metrics ... and that won't be in any way aided by an open "Appeals thread".
#687
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:06 AM
Seth Stin Exoría, on 28 May 2015 - 11:01 AM, said:
And trust me, with more than double the headshots as you, I certainly get an over abundance of accusations.
Zeusus, on 28 May 2015 - 11:04 AM, said:
#690
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:10 AM
Joseph Mallan, on 28 May 2015 - 11:07 AM, said:
![^_^](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/happy.png)
Satan n stuff, on 28 May 2015 - 11:06 AM, said:
#691
#692
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:10 AM
Seth Stin Exoría, on 28 May 2015 - 10:45 AM, said:
If you're legit, then you have nothing to worry about.
I use a modified user.cfg file in addition to a DPI shift on my mouse to better line up longer range shots. Both have been stated by PGI as allowed. I've been "allegedly" reported several times, usually over lucky shots, but I'm also better than most players are at directly pegging light mechs with PPCs (being drunk enhances this ability for some odd reason). I have no reasons to doubt that reports have been made against me. Hell, if I was the other player in some of the shots I've made, I would have reported myself
![:P](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
If you don't cheat, and only use what PGI has already said is allowed, you have nothing to worry about.
#693
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:10 AM
bad arcade kitty, on 27 May 2015 - 10:23 PM, said:
phhh
it frankly annoys me that people are more mad at cheaters than at team traitors, they blame cheaters but it's ok to them to betray the position of their inactive teammate, imo the second thing is like 100 times worse than using aimbot or wallhack
In teh right circumstance it is. But not all. And it is also OK for the aggrieved to submit a ticket about the traitors. I PGI deems them at fault, all punishments should apply.
#694
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:11 AM
Seth Stin Exoría, on 28 May 2015 - 10:45 AM, said:
LOL. Then you have nothing to fear. Folks in games can never accurately assess cheating. The best they can do is say "This player might be cheating" and send their name into PGI.
The assessment of whether someone is cheating or not ... is not statistical ... though out of band statistics might flag someone for further investigation ... they might just be a very skilled shooter. However, 3rd party cheat software is detectable. There are lots of little things that PGI can look for ... it is a fight between PGIs detection techniques on one side and the hackers ability to hide the software on the other. When PGI identifies that this software is in use (or something similar) they can then act to ban the account.
So ... don't worry about ingame accusations ... unless you are actually using cheat software.
#697
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:14 AM
Seth Stin Exoría, on 28 May 2015 - 10:45 AM, said:
I am not accusing you of anything. But this is not a court of law, and innocent till proven guilty does not apply.
Dimento Graven, on 28 May 2015 - 11:12 AM, said:
Pretty soon being drunk while playing will be considered cheating...
If I shoot Mechs like a throw darts when drunk... It is!
#699
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:16 AM
Zeusus, on 28 May 2015 - 11:11 AM, said:
I just want to stop telemarketers from calling FROM my house, They always seem to be able to escape before I find which room they called from. (yes, they know how to spoof your own number to call you now.)
#700
Posted 28 May 2015 - 11:17 AM
LORD TSARKON, on 28 May 2015 - 12:29 AM, said:
Well said.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users