#1
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:07 PM
#2
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:10 PM
TBR -A with crazy neg quirks and the chassis nerfs to the TBR in general makes it P2W?
If you wait a few weeks you can pay Cbills2W.........
BTW i think you need to take a look at the GHR quirks again.
Edited by DarthRevis, 02 June 2015 - 04:11 PM.
#3
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:12 PM
I has no weapons on the arms so you have to face a man constantly to hit them
In that mech, with that CT
P2W it is not!
You buy one, and then report to us on your never ending stream of extreme victories
Edited by cSand, 02 June 2015 - 04:13 PM.
#4
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:13 PM
Edited by Quickdraw Crobat, 02 June 2015 - 04:13 PM.
#5
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:18 PM
should have just titled this "All the other nonsense QQ threads are already started, here's mine."
#6
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:19 PM
But before we discuss the question of whether it's P2W, I do agree with DarthRevis that we need to have a look at the quirks. There have been many IS variants lately that sacrifice weapon quirks for armor and structure quirks. I do wonder if PGI is doing a bit of testing.
The GHR-P has 7 energy hardpoints in the torso and 1 in the arm. This is ideal for the current laservomit meta, and it also has considerable bonus armour and structure quirk. The 5% range bonus may as well not exist though. Just looking at the numbers, I'm not sure if the extra armour and structure makes up for the lack of firepower in the current meta. It's a bit early to say whether it's better than other Grasshoppers, in my mind.
#7
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:20 PM
#8
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:22 PM
cSand, on 02 June 2015 - 04:12 PM, said:
I has no weapons on the arms so you have to face a man constantly to hit them
It does, however, have 120 degree torso twist. More than the Orion, more than the Cataphract, more than the Thunderbolt, more than the Jagermec... in short, more than any other IS heavy mech except the LRM catapults.
Having arms without weapons for absorbing damage is quite alright in the current meta. Which is why the Banshee is fairly popular.
#10
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:24 PM
Alistair Winter, on 02 June 2015 - 04:22 PM, said:
Having arms without weapons for absorbing damage is quite alright in the current meta. Which is why the Banshee is fairly popular.
Well the other GHRs do too, you can almost look behind you
even so you still gotta look right at someone to hit em. And that CT just crumbles
#11
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:27 PM
cSand, on 02 June 2015 - 04:12 PM, said:
I has no weapons on the arms so you have to face a man constantly to hit them
In that mech, with that CT
P2W it is not!
You buy one, and then report to us on your never ending stream of extreme victories
With all of the really strong mechs out there, I don't think I'd call this GRH pay to win.
However, PGI very clearly saved the most optimized chassis for the Gift Store and did not put it into the pack that people pre-ordered.
This isn't the first time they've done this either.
TBR-A, DWF-S, WHK-C, etc.
You might think it not having arm mounts is some kind of a detriment, but every play that plays metabuilds sees purely ablaitive arms that you can shave for extra tonnage - and a CT you can better conceal while you poke with 4 or 5 high energy mounts.
The sky isn't falling, but this isn't a coincidence either.
#12
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:27 PM
cSand, on 02 June 2015 - 04:24 PM, said:
even so you still gotta look right at someone to hit em. And that CT just crumbles
I've never played the Grasshoppers, so I'm no expert. I only know from experience that looking them straight in the eye when they're charging 7-8 medium lasers or MPLs is a rather uncomfortable experience.
If their great weakness is the vulnerable CT, then it's not so far fetched to think that the OP has a point. The best GHR may be the one with the biggest armour and structure buffs?
#13
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:27 PM
cSand, on 02 June 2015 - 04:24 PM, said:
Well the other GHRs do too, you can almost look behind you
even so you still gotta look right at someone to hit em. And that CT just crumbles
Orion's also can pack some pp-fld to compensate for the CT some. And Banshees have better armor and hotboxes.
#14
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:28 PM
Lack of heat quirks and lack of arm weapons are pretty decisive for not being OP.
#15
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:31 PM
#16
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:31 PM
Ultimatum X, on 02 June 2015 - 04:27 PM, said:
With all of the really strong mechs out there, I don't think I'd call this GRH pay to win.
However, PGI very clearly saved the most optimized chassis for the Gift Store and did not put it into the pack that people pre-ordered.
This isn't the first time they've done this either.
TBR-A, DWF-S, WHK-C, etc.
You might think it not having arm mounts is some kind of a detriment, but every play that plays metabuilds sees purely ablaitive arms that you can shave for extra tonnage - and a CT you can better conceal while you poke with 4 or 5 high energy mounts.
The sky isn't falling, but this isn't a coincidence either.
Cuz DAT Panther and Enforcer are clearly superior to the previous versions........ Right?
Seems to poke some holes in the conspiracy, to me. As do more than half the clan reinforcements. A handful of "better" options are kind of expected.
#17
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:46 PM
#18
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:48 PM
Everything has value and a price. A couple of hours at a cheap wage or waiting a couple of months for many hours to earn play money seems very fair. You either are willing to pay the man or please be quiet.
#19
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:48 PM
#20
Posted 02 June 2015 - 04:53 PM
Chuck YeaGurr, on 02 June 2015 - 04:48 PM, said:
Your and idiot and an idiot and his money are soon parted. You must be part of the 1 percent problem in this country. I've paid more than enough on this game and will do so no more because of bad business.
Everything has value and a price. A couple of hours at a cheap wage or waiting a couple of months for many hours to earn play money seems very fair. You either are willing to pay the man or please be quiet.
Edited by the wr3ck, 02 June 2015 - 05:02 PM.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users