LordBraxton, on 06 June 2015 - 02:08 PM, said:
You attacked my writing style, dismissed my opinions, and blathered about your supposed military expertise while trying to fit as many (what you obviously think are) impressive vocabulary words into your post as possible.
1/10
It's ok to express an opinion on a video game forum without a 50 page dissertation. Try addressing some of my points next time. also, here's another personal attack you can condescendingly reply to with another wall of garbage.
get out more.
Every advantage should cost in-game resources, not meta-game currency.
That's my opinion, I'll post it how I want to.
Correcting the way you post those unfounded opinions isn't "attacking" you - nor is my casual use of vocabulary some sort of put-on show. Accusing me of "blathering" about military experience I referenced indirectly as a direct response to your ownl attacks is just silly.
Disagreeing with silly assertions you made without support is hardly "dismissing your opinions," nor is dismissing an un-credible opinion some sort of misbehavior, as you imply. As for "condescension," if you do not want to be condescended to, it is advisable not to require your opponent to talk down in order to reach the level on which you are arguing. Arrogantly deriding people with insults and "because I say so" pronouncements and then accusing them of your own misbehavior when they respond is childishly sophistic and sadly common. You've barely tried to make any points, instead relying on personal attacks and rudeness in an attempt to distract me - but the ones you've made, I've debunked.
As for your latest unsupported opinion - we're talking about Battlemechs. They're all bought with meta-game currency - what then is your point?