Which, in general, is:
Superior in combat, taking things like weaponry/survivability/manuevrability/usability/etc into account.
Inferior in combat, taking the above into account.
Cooler, and if you don't vote Battlemechs, you are a dirty heathen.
I voted Zoids, Vertical Tanks, and Battlemechs, respectively. Titans are just too ridiculously large and slow, and any of the other options could just run through the shields, between the legs, and shoot it in the crotch. Gundams look like crap and I hate anime, so no bias there at all. Never played Armored Core, but it is set about 5 minutes into the future, so they can't be all that great.
Bringing Godbots into the equation is no longer allowed.
Edited by Zakatak, 04 July 2012 - 10:19 PM.
 1
 1 
	


 
						
				

 
						
				 , mainly because Zoids are so much faster then Mechs when you compare there tonnage and speeds, Atlas is a 100 tons and moves a 54km/h while a Liger Zero is 85 tons and moves at 307  km/h and Zoid, on the subject of weaponry Zoids and Mechs are comparable but not the same
, mainly because Zoids are so much faster then Mechs when you compare there tonnage and speeds, Atlas is a 100 tons and moves a 54km/h while a Liger Zero is 85 tons and moves at 307  km/h and Zoid, on the subject of weaponry Zoids and Mechs are comparable but not the same
					
					 
						
				

 ).
 ).
 also im not dissing battletech, just saying it b4 i get flamed by "BATTLETECH IS MY RELIGION" people.
 also im not dissing battletech, just saying it b4 i get flamed by "BATTLETECH IS MY RELIGION" people. 
						
				 
						
				 
					
					 
						
				
 
								

