You have Laser Boats, PPC Boats, Gauss Boats, UAC/AC Boats, SRM Boats, Short Range Boats, Long Range Boats, you get the idea.
The point is, every other weapon system in the game works best when boated, either with more of the same, or with something that has a comparable range bracket, firing profile, or damage output.
So why is it, that ONLY LRMs are considered BAD when boated. And before the Olympians descend from Mount Tryhard, I'm not referring to how bad the LRM system is in competitive play. I realize that LRMs are a badly designed weapon system (in general) and only a few can make them work in the competitive circuit.
I'm referring to the number of players that seem to think LRMs should only be a Token or "Support" Weapon. Something that they throw into a build when they have a spare 7 tons. Now, I'm not saying that is a bad thing. Being a Super Stock Lore Buff, I quite often throw a Large Laser or AC 5 onto a build that probably can't make good use of it. But that is not the point.
The TL:DR, why are LRMs the ONLY weapon that players believe SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BOAT (despite there being multiple precedents of LRM Boats in Lore), when it is considered common sense for every other weapon to be boated.
Curious to see the reasoning for this phenomenon.
Edit: The reason I ask, is because in multiple threads I've read recently, it seems to be a common consensus that LRMs should not be allowed to boat.
Edited by Thunder Child, 31 August 2015 - 02:11 PM.