Jump to content

Weak, Illogical People Are Destroying Their Own Game. Not The Meta.


246 replies to this topic

#221 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 03 November 2015 - 07:09 AM

View Postcdlord, on 03 November 2015 - 07:01 AM, said:

I would like to point out, as another update, that despite my invitations across several threads; multiple times in those threads, that no "tryhard" has taken my invitation to "show me the light".

That speaks volumes to me.


You stop playing before I even get home from work, let alone eat dinner/talk to my wife. So no, that doesn't really mean anything. I'm not sure what you want to be shown either.

By the way, anyone who calls taking a good build abuse and compares it to using cheat codes is off their rocker. Like seriously, that is the most irrational thing to say, and clearly demonstrates a problem in the player base.

#222 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 03 November 2015 - 07:52 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 03 November 2015 - 07:09 AM, said:

You stop playing before I even get home from work, let alone eat dinner/talk to my wife. So no, that doesn't really mean anything. I'm not sure what you want to be shown either.

By the way, anyone who calls taking a good build abuse and compares it to using cheat codes is off their rocker. Like seriously, that is the most irrational thing to say, and clearly demonstrates a problem in the player base.

I was on Friday night till past midnight MST. And the specific words I used were "Exploitation of a flawed system."

#223 xWiredx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,805 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 08:09 AM

I'm not really the 1 vee 1 type of person but I would be willing to do a match in a meta vs non-meta build comparison because science. The problem is determining what to use as 'non-meta' since that can be many things whereas meta is one of only a couple of things depending on the mech+variant usually.

I think probably the easiest way to test this would be to compare a stock clan mech loadout with a meta clan mech loadout of the same mech+variant. Maybe even go so far as to pit the stock TBR-C against the champion one. Testing one of each class (Direwolf, Timberwolf, Stormcrow, Arctic Cheetah) in this type of manner would all be pretty simple. Testing using IS mechs would be harder. We'd have to decide on ground rules for building and all that, where one would stay pretty faithful to the original loadout but with the same upgrades as the meta loadout.

Either way, I still think OP is way off base. Whining about meta is also pointless, but saying that players of different skill levels and different mentalities is wrecking the game is just 100% stupid.

#224 xXBagheeraXx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,707 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 08:38 AM

I wouldnt say its the players fault entirely. Most Vehicle based mmos I play all have the same problem. When anything is simply..GOOD for its tier/battle rating/Weight class it is considered OP...I mean God forbid you actually have a good mech/tank/plane! What do we look like? People who want to have fun?

People need to realize that there is NOTHING wrong with something being good int his game...

they need to realize thier hunchbacks and Atlases are now outdated. It will get worse as time goes on...stop trying to get everything that face stomps your Hunchback (the pen knife) nerfed to your standard....Or get unresonable buffs given to your pen knives to keep them relevant...

I'm assuming the OP is talking about the current laser meta and how eveyrone is whining about it...well...Ladies and gents this is the product of "this is OP nerf plz!" PPCs where good once, Ac20s where good once. SRM's where AWESOME once. Ac2's where good once...but people whining about battlemasters gunning them down under the table (remember battlemasters? They used to be feared for BALLISTICS. nobody remembers those days) and got the rate of fire for IS autocannons beat with a nerfbat. Even the quirked up mechs now still dont quite fire ac2s as fast as the old school ones. SRM splat builds used to be high risk, high reward fun builds.....nerfed...ppcs have been useless for quite some time now unless you have ungodly aim, FAR too much work/heat for a paltry 10 points of damage.

So by all means, keep whining. When this rebalnce patch comes and clans get giganerfed like everyone wants there will be a new meta. I got my money on IS LPL or just everyone straight gauss boating. Especially if that ******** laser target/damage nonsense actually goes live.

#225 1Grimbane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,123 posts
  • Locationsafe. . . . . you'll never get me in my hidey hole.

Posted 03 November 2015 - 08:43 AM

why do't we just make every single weapon in the game do 2 dmg and everyone have ecm .... would that make the little babies feel better?

#226 Shae Starfyre

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 1,429 posts
  • LocationThe Fringe

Posted 03 November 2015 - 08:52 AM

View PostPholkLorr, on 30 October 2015 - 04:50 PM, said:

Couldn't have put it better myself.

Except that my OP was worded the way it was because 1) I have a big ego and 2) I absolutely abhor stupid people.

The post was designed to call out the logical fails of a type of people , who as you can see, still fail to get it.

Another thing that some people have problem comprehending: thread title says weak, illogical people are destroying THEIR OWN game. Not destroying THE game. My game is fine. Could use better balance and faster wait times, but otherwise fine. It's those who say meta is destroying THE game that irks me. It is so full of logical, entitled fail.


I find this response truly systemic to your own fallacies, but I cannot bring myself to expound on it. Well done.

Edit: before you raise an eyebrow and give a slight-shake of your head, whatever response you might think is relevant, is beyond a doubt, lacking the simplicity of simply stating, "Touche," and leaving it at that.

For to be so obtuse and claim abhorrence with such gusto, the statement should come so easily to you, and self evident, that no response at all will suffice.

Edited by Aphoticus, 03 November 2015 - 09:02 AM.


#227 Hotthedd

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • 3,213 posts
  • LocationDixie

Posted 03 November 2015 - 09:01 AM

The meta game in MW:O has never changed. In a game where only 1/8 to 1/4 of your enemy needs to be destroyed in order to kill them, the "meta" (the easiest way to kill enemies and avoid being killed) has always been to use either single weapon systems or compatible weapon systems in large groups (alphas) focused on individual components.

The only pseudo exceptions being the 3 Lurmaggeddons, and even then, it was about boating as many of the primary weapon as possible.

The only thing that has changed is the flavor of the month weapons (through buffs), and the FotM chassis (through quirks).

Unless and until PGI chooses to something about the actual "meta", by making it harder to achieve, or have trade-offs to other play styles, it will always be the same. Only the weapon flavor and favorite chassis will revolve. It is the reason that individual weapon balancing is and will continue to be a hapless pursuit.

#228 Almond Brown

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 5,851 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 09:14 AM

Well perhaps if they "tightened" the Tier level allowance rule to say, Only T3/4/5 can fight each other, then all the T1/2 folks would not have to deal with all those "Weak and Illogical" types contained therein becasue there is no way that any T1/2 players could ever be "Weak and Illogical". ;)

And for those who think they have large "ego's", just wait until the Steam crowd shows up... There will not be enough "bridges" for everyone to huddle under with said "ego's". LOL ;)

#229 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 03 November 2015 - 09:21 AM

View Post1Grimbane, on 03 November 2015 - 08:43 AM, said:

why do't we just make every single weapon in the game do 2 dmg and everyone have ecm .... would that make the little babies feel better?

Talk about illogical.......

#230 Pika

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 569 posts
  • LocationLiverpool, UK

Posted 03 November 2015 - 09:30 AM

I think you might be misappropriating the title of "illogical" to people who want to have fun.

You said it yourself - "Fun is subjective." and I hate to say it buddy, but the vast (VAST!) majority of people who post on these forums do not reflect the player base as a whole. You're upset about... well about something, I'm not sure. Lower tier players not having fun with meta builds? Just anyone who refuses to play the game like you?

This game is not like WoW or breaking down a wall. Half of the fun in this game can be making stupid builds work, why the hell do you think the Urbanmech was even made and why do you think it sold? It's iconic BECAUSE it's terrible. Because being in something terrible can be FUN. Because taking down a Direwolf with a well placed Ac20 round in your waddling little trash can is funny where as doing it in a lazer-vomiting Stormcrow or PPCing it in your Thunderbolt is run of the mill and done to death.

You're not a super cool leet pro gamer because you can pick the same net-build that pulls 1000 damage as everyone else. You're pro if you can beat that build in something considered "Crap."

Your OWN argument destroys your own rant and I think that's hysterical. Your own ignorance of what makes other people log into this game is astounding and I am incredibly thankful you have absolutely no say in how this game is made.

Edited by Pika, 03 November 2015 - 09:33 AM.


#231 Jon Gotham

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Bite
  • The Bite
  • 2,664 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 09:40 AM

View PostMechWarrior5152251, on 31 October 2015 - 05:45 PM, said:

If you are not in a team playing chickenshit usually gets you a higher score. Let others take all the risks to maximize your own score. Of course if everyone is chickenshit on your team you will lose.

Solo Q 101 right there. that's my secondary worst thing actually, the type of play fostered by that Q and watching it bleed into group and CW. Really has spoiled the potential.

ME ME ME ME MINE MY!

#232 Koniks

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • Moderate Giver
  • 1,301 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 09:46 AM

View PostPholkLorr, on 29 October 2015 - 09:58 PM, said:

The meta changes constantly.

Assumes facts not in evidence. I think you meant "infrequently."

#233 Lugh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 3,910 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 10:56 AM

View PostMizeur, on 03 November 2015 - 09:46 AM, said:

Assumes facts not in evidence. I think you meant "infrequently."

If by infrequently you mean 1 -2 times per year, sure.

#234 Sethliopod

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 217 posts
  • LocationInside the smoking wreck.

Posted 03 November 2015 - 12:03 PM

Feels like the trollings of a sociopath, to me. All that talk about contempt and loathing for huge groups of people. Intense sense of self-worth. Ability to get under people's skin with ease.

They make great trolls. Twelve pages based on insulting a large group of active players. I'd close the thread or move it to that other place.

#235 JernauM

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 132 posts

Posted 03 November 2015 - 11:51 PM

In successful PvP games, the most skilled players / teams are celebrated and the most effective techniques are emulated. In MWO, the most skilled players / teams are vilified and the most effective techniques are decried as exploits.

This is a generalization of course, but that's how it seems to me.

#236 Random Carnage

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 946 posts
  • LocationNew Zealand

Posted 03 November 2015 - 11:56 PM

View Postcdlord, on 03 November 2015 - 07:52 AM, said:

"Exploitation of a flawed system."

That's called playing MWO isn't it?

#237 PholkLorr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 155 posts
  • LocationThe Best Player

Posted 04 November 2015 - 12:59 AM

Yea, Dota 2 had a prize pool of $18,500,000 for one competition. The best players, best teams, best playstyle(s) were rewarded. I watched some interviews with Sumail and Dendi and they were saying stuff like "i want to crush my opponents". Good, i respect that. In here, there seems to be a crapload of bads who, instead of learning to get good, cry about the good players using exploits.

For ppl who want to win, the smart thing to do is to emulate the best players. That is, if you want to win. And i am 100% certain that everyone wants to win.

Actually, everyone wants to win. Even the bad players want to win. If they were having fun SOLELY based on running bad builds, they wouldn't be crying about superior players with superior builds wrecking them. The problem is that they *want to have their cake and to eat it too*. They invent their own rules (not the game's rules) AND they want to win. Anyone who doesn't stick to their invented rules are using exploits.

Reminds me of C&C and Red Alert. "10 mins no rush". "No super weapons". "No Yuri". "No this no that". If two parties agreed to play by a rule, that's all nice and good. If one doesn't agree on an arbitrary rule, the other whines and says you're exploiting. Lol.

Alright, imagine that the faulty logic of "anyone who plays meta = exploit" (a la cdlord) wasn't faulty. Just pretend that it isn't. So if he says "single heatsink atlas with SRMs and LRMs" is the "non exploit" way to go. What's stopping someone else from saying, nonono, "single heatsink Atlas, with PURE SRM only build is the way to go. The other atlas with LRMs is exploiting because he can hit me at long range and i cant do sheet" (well actually you can do something about it, you just don't want to). See, the problem with this logic is that, anyone can invent their own rules (not the game rules) and say that people who don't abide by their invented rules are exploiting.

In any case, cryhards can stick to their crappy builds for their own enjoyment. Im going to carry on playing the best builds and steamroll the cryhards with my 700 to 1k dmg. That to me is enjoyment.

It's still a win win situation in the end. The cryhards get to have their fun sucking and crying using crappy builds (coupled with generally below average skill) while the best players (with the best skills) coupled with the best builds gonna winwinwin. Everybody gets to have fun. Both the tryhards and cryhards. What's not to like? Fun for everyone, regardless of skill level or playstyle/build.

#238 Sarlic

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hearing Impaired
  • Hearing Impaired
  • 4,519 posts
  • LocationEurope

Posted 04 November 2015 - 01:19 AM

I think you lost your creditbility long time ago. Troll- or not.

Off to go to K-town. Because this whole thread smells like a troll and TS has nothing to add to the discussion.

Edited by Sarlic, 04 November 2015 - 01:19 AM.


#239 Pika

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 569 posts
  • LocationLiverpool, UK

Posted 04 November 2015 - 01:25 AM

View PostPholkLorr, on 04 November 2015 - 12:59 AM, said:

Yea, Dota 2 had a prize pool of $18,500,000 for one competition. The best players, best teams, best playstyle(s) were rewarded. I watched some interviews with Sumail and Dendi and they were saying stuff like "i want to crush my opponents". Good, i respect that. In here, there seems to be a crapload of bads who, instead of learning to get good, cry about the good players using exploits.

For ppl who want to win, the smart thing to do is to emulate the best players. That is, if you want to win. And i am 100% certain that everyone wants to win.

Actually, everyone wants to win. Even the bad players want to win. If they were having fun SOLELY based on running bad builds, they wouldn't be crying about superior players with superior builds wrecking them. The problem is that they *want to have their cake and to eat it too*. They invent their own rules (not the game's rules) AND they want to win. Anyone who doesn't stick to their invented rules are using exploits.

Reminds me of C&C and Red Alert. "10 mins no rush". "No super weapons". "No Yuri". "No this no that". If two parties agreed to play by a rule, that's all nice and good. If one doesn't agree on an arbitrary rule, the other whines and says you're exploiting. Lol.

Alright, imagine that the faulty logic of "anyone who plays meta = exploit" (a la cdlord) wasn't faulty. Just pretend that it isn't. So if he says "single heatsink atlas with SRMs and LRMs" is the "non exploit" way to go. What's stopping someone else from saying, nonono, "single heatsink Atlas, with PURE SRM only build is the way to go. The other atlas with LRMs is exploiting because he can hit me at long range and i cant do sheet" (well actually you can do something about it, you just don't want to). See, the problem with this logic is that, anyone can invent their own rules (not the game rules) and say that people who don't abide by their invented rules are exploiting.

In any case, cryhards can stick to their crappy builds for their own enjoyment. Im going to carry on playing the best builds and steamroll the cryhards with my 700 to 1k dmg. That to me is enjoyment.

It's still a win win situation in the end. The cryhards get to have their fun sucking and crying using crappy builds (coupled with generally below average skill) while the best players (with the best skills) coupled with the best builds gonna winwinwin. Everybody gets to have fun. Both the tryhards and cryhards. What's not to like? Fun for everyone, regardless of skill level or playstyle/build.



Ehhh~ you're right and you're wrong.

You can't apply those pro-scenes here due to how MWO Works. This game is rarely about individual skill and more the sum of a team's parts. But have you not wondered why the pro-gaming scene revolves around MOBAs these days even though MMO PvP teams are a thing; FPS Pro teams are (still!) a thing as are fighting game top level players and yet, are hardly given a look-in. Perhaps a foot note on a gaming blog somewhere or a two paragraph article on Kotaku... while the LOL and DOTA tournaments get explicit days of coverage and headlines all the time, even recently showing up on BBC news' website and televised news?

It's the same reason hardly anyone gives a hoot about Formula 1 any more compared to most other sports: The same people with the same tricks and the same characters\classes(Cars I guess in this example) doing the same thing over and over and achieving the exact same, predictable results every time. DoTA and LOL are so heavily watched and celebrated because the pro players are constantly changing the meta, doing bizarre builds and changing up what is considered top tier in an effort to throw the other team. There are over 2million possible character combinations in a LoL team and heaven knows how many more when you consider item builds. The ability to make a team from that vast selection that works well enough to totally throw your opponent is a skill, and THAT is why the pro players there are celebrated. And the reason pro players in the Smash scene or Street Fighter scene or hell, even here in MWO are not given a look in is because it's the same predictable and downright boring thing every time.

Fox only, no items, final destination. Ken \ Chun-Li in SF3 Thrid Strike. Stormcrow\Thunderbolt laser vomit.

Does it work? Sure you can pull wins with that, usually very decisive ones. We've all done it and done it consistently. But how is it still good after 300 wins of the same play style doing the same things in the same places on the same maps every time?

I'll answer for you: It's not. Perhaps for you it is, perhaps you have the patience to do that over and over and over to make some arbitrary numbers and ratios on a stat-page in the dark corners of the net tick upward, but for the vast majority of players it gets old and it gets old quick. Perhaps you feel like an incredible badass when you core-out someone's CT with 6 Large Lasers for the 813th time but I personally, am bored of it. This is why we have no 'real' pro-scene.

The community does not love the pro players of this game because the pro players in this game are unique in that they actively influence the devs to maintain the status-quo in terms of balance while simultaneously accosting them for not making changes. The pro players are not supported because they encourage and perpetuate stagnant and boring gameplay that has been starting to grind on and get old since the clans were first introduced. They're not loved because they then point at the devs and blame them for not changing it, while threatening the devs they'll quit and leave and tell their mom on them if they so much as adjust the heat scale or burn times. They're not loved because what they do hurts the long term health of the game, just so they can feel better than a T3 player.

A good player is loved because he changes the meta, he finds ways to circumvent and beat the meta with effective ruthlessness and to turn the opponents biggest strengths into glaring weakness through a combination of skill and equipment. MWO does not allow that much freedom, in MWO you select your load out from a pre-built net-list focusing on heat and DPS and nothing else. Skill is secondary, the build comes first.

So you keep playing the game the way you want, you keep enjoying your 500th game of the same 'Mech with the same build. I don't want to take that away from you. Just realise that people who do not play the game like you do are not bad people.

If you want to be a true pro gamer, this is the wrong game.

Edited by Pika, 04 November 2015 - 01:33 AM.


#240 Shae Starfyre

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 1,429 posts
  • LocationThe Fringe

Posted 04 November 2015 - 05:39 AM

View PostPika, on 04 November 2015 - 01:25 AM, said:



Ehhh~ you're right and you're wrong.

....Good Read....

If you want to be a true pro gamer, this is the wrong game.


Touche'





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users