data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/683d7/683d7dc77042774f08a54d7801da2db420882c6e" alt=""
Jester/firebrand/topdog
#1
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:30 PM
1. Jester
2. Firebrand
3. TopDog
#2
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:33 PM
#3
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:34 PM
Edited by Juodas Varnas, 27 December 2015 - 02:34 PM.
#4
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:35 PM
#5
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:35 PM
#6
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:36 PM
#7
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:40 PM
#8
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:49 PM
#9
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:51 PM
#10
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:57 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88519/885192aa9594aa1c40671c485fde4d9cc7384f71" alt="Posted Image"
#11
Posted 27 December 2015 - 02:58 PM
#12
Posted 27 December 2015 - 03:13 PM
#13
Posted 27 December 2015 - 03:26 PM
Of the 3 chassis, I only currently have pults. I love the K2, but precisely because it has ballistic hardpoints, but I'm beginning to imagine what happens when you swap gun weight for speed.
I was thinking about finally jumping on the band wagon and mastering TDRs next, but I'm undecided whether to just grind out 3 variants for cBills or grease the wheels with a Top Dog. The paint job seems a bit plain.
The loadout on Firebrand seems fairly unique and I like to look of the needle thin AC2s.
#14
Posted 27 December 2015 - 03:40 PM
Firebrand is a jack of all trades, master of none. Ballistics are better on the -S and the -DD, energy is better on the Jester. The Jester is also better at spreading damage (a Catapult...better at spreading damage...man times have changed), making it a superior option for XL usage.
You can build the Jester into an IS Ebon Jag and do nearly as well as the Clan version. Once they shrink the CPLT down with the re-scale, it's going to really shine.
Also, if you're feeling ballsy, running a Jester with a giant XL 350, Jump Jets, and short-range MPL is pretty hilarious.
#15
Posted 27 December 2015 - 03:46 PM
#16
Posted 27 December 2015 - 03:59 PM
***EDIT***
Thunderbolts are ugly. They can go to hell.
Edited by W A R K H A N, 27 December 2015 - 03:59 PM.
#17
Posted 27 December 2015 - 04:17 PM
5LeafClover, on 27 December 2015 - 03:26 PM, said:
Of the 3 chassis, I only currently have pults. I love the K2, but precisely because it has ballistic hardpoints, but I'm beginning to imagine what happens when you swap gun weight for speed.
I was thinking about finally jumping on the band wagon and mastering TDRs next, but I'm undecided whether to just grind out 3 variants for cBills or grease the wheels with a Top Dog. The paint job seems a bit plain.
The loadout on Firebrand seems fairly unique and I like to look of the needle thin AC2s.
If you are interested in performance, almost anything you think you want to do with a Firebrand is better placed on the MAL-2P, the exceptions being PPC-builds. And then, PPCs are better on Blackjacks.
If you like the aesthetics of the Jager, then by all means. The Jager as a platform is certainly capable, but I find the other variants to be better performers than the Firebrand. In my opnion, the Firebrand's biggest weakness is that it doesn't have any ballistic cool-down quirks. If it could rip off AC/2 rounds like a BJ-1/DC, I'd play mine a lot more since it could do two ERLL and two AC/2 very well.
#18
Posted 27 December 2015 - 04:19 PM
#19
Posted 27 December 2015 - 04:23 PM
Top Dog is rather tanky. Load that sucker up with 2 large and 4 medium pulse lasers and you should achieve a good kill count.
I was never much of a fan for the 'Frankenstein' mechs. (Arms straight out).
#20
Posted 27 December 2015 - 06:13 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e92/24e92c9f9d9b20d4fc4264fc6c558b864dc34b50" alt="Posted Image"
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users