Jump to content

This Week Russ Is Asking What We'd Like To See For Clan Wave 4 Pack Omnis Circa 3053


829 replies to this topic

#641 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 15 January 2016 - 07:46 AM

View PostTamwulf, on 15 January 2016 - 07:38 AM, said:

I'd like to see a Maruader IIC, Warhammer IIC, and Locust IIC.

Otherwise, how about some second line Battle Mechs? Russ said 3053, but there are some 3058 Mechs in the game, so... I'm confused a bit.



Not really, they were in TRO 3058, but they have production start dates before that, notably the Shadow Cat, TRO 3058, but production start date of 3003.

#642 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 07:47 AM

View PostWidowmaker1981, on 15 January 2016 - 07:44 AM, said:


To be fair, i think all the people saying no in that thread are the diehard IS players who say no to the idea of any buff to any clan mech ever.


Yeah, they aren't even bothering to try to cloak their arguments in logic. Apparently the worst Clan mechs are WAY better than IS mechs like the Banshee, Stalker, and Battlemaster.

#643 Pariah Devalis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Clan Cat
  • The Clan Cat
  • 7,655 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationAboard the NCS True Path

Posted 15 January 2016 - 07:48 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 15 January 2016 - 07:47 AM, said:


Yeah, they aren't even bothering to try to cloak their arguments in logic. Apparently the worst Clan mechs are WAY better than IS mechs like the Banshee, Stalker, and Battlemaster.


Clearly. Usually when I retort with a sardonic "show me where the Kit Fox, Gargoyle, or Mad Dog touched you," they don't even try and respond.

#644 DONTOR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,806 posts
  • LocationStuck on a piece of Commando in my Ice Ferret

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:15 AM

How bout no omni mechs, and a Clan totem mech pack. Seriously we need the Kodiak...

#645 reign

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 459 posts

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:17 AM

View PostDONTOR, on 15 January 2016 - 08:15 AM, said:

How bout no omni mechs, and a Clan totem mech pack. Seriously we need the Kodiak...



Yup, Grizzley and Kodiak rule all these choices. No hard locked anything. (low arms) but both have torso mounts.

#646 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:17 AM

View PostDONTOR, on 15 January 2016 - 08:15 AM, said:

How bout no omni mechs, and a Clan totem mech pack. Seriously we need the Kodiak...


Kodiak/totem mechs are probably going to be single mech packs like the unseens. Russ said something to that note on twitter.

https://twitter.com/...647180061323264

Edited by Gas Guzzler, 15 January 2016 - 08:19 AM.


#647 Quicksilver Aberration

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nightmare
  • The Nightmare
  • 12,102 posts
  • LocationKansas City, MO

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:19 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 15 January 2016 - 08:17 AM, said:


Kodiak/totem mechs are probably going to be single mech packs like the unseens. Russ said something to that note on twitter.

Not to mention, true totems are only mechs that are specifically mentioned to be totems in the TRO so good luck filling a pack with the very limited selection. The only reason I say this is the arguments with other BT nerds told me that this is the official stance (Randall Bills I believe made a post about this a long time ago).

Edited by Quicksilver Kalasa, 15 January 2016 - 08:19 AM.


#648 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:20 AM

View Postreign, on 15 January 2016 - 08:17 AM, said:



Yup, Grizzley and Kodiak rule all these choices. No hard locked anything. (low arms) but both have torso mounts.


Yes, like the Kodiak with 1 Ballistic, 1 E and 1 M in the torso and EIGHT energy hardpoints in the low slung arms? I wouldn't get your hopes up.

#649 reign

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 459 posts

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:23 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 15 January 2016 - 08:20 AM, said:


Yes, like the Kodiak with 1 Ballistic, 1 E and 1 M in the torso and EIGHT energy hardpoints in the low slung arms? I wouldn't get your hopes up.


wat? All non omni mechs get some inflation and here are the hardpoints. Thats 2 missles and 1 B.

Posted Image

#650 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:24 AM

View Postreign, on 15 January 2016 - 08:23 AM, said:


wat? All non omni mechs get some inflation and here are the hardpoints. Thats 2 missles and 1 B.

Posted Image


My apologies, 2M.

And I doubt a mech with 12 hardpoints is going to see any inflation.

#651 reign

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 459 posts

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:25 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 15 January 2016 - 08:24 AM, said:


My apologies, 2M.

And I doubt a mech with 12 hardpoints is going to see any inflation.


Probably be 2 B and 3 M on the torsos to be honest. and that would be enough for a good build.

#652 Dagorlad13

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 516 posts
  • LocationClan Ghost Bear Occupation Zone.

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:30 AM

View Postpbiggz, on 15 January 2016 - 07:28 AM, said:


I'd play the thing more if masc were worth the tonnage or I could remove it for more firepower.


MASC is invaluable on the Executioner, you can use it to turn, stop and accelerate almost as well as a medium when you need to. I love using MASC to turn around an surprise the crap out of backstabbing lights!

View PostDONTOR, on 15 January 2016 - 08:15 AM, said:

How bout no omni mechs, and a Clan totem mech pack. Seriously we need the Kodiak...


I still want new Omnis, but I would like to see the Kodiak in a one-off pack first. We Ghost Bears need our FireMoth and Kingfisher too.

#653 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:31 AM

View Postreign, on 15 January 2016 - 08:25 AM, said:


Probably be 2 B and 3 M on the torsos to be honest. and that would be enough for a good build.


Why would you think that? How many Battlemechs in MWO have 12 hardpoints? I'm struggling to think of any.

Edited by Gas Guzzler, 15 January 2016 - 08:32 AM.


#654 reign

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 459 posts

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:39 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 15 January 2016 - 08:31 AM, said:


Why would you think that? How many Battlemechs in MWO have 12 hardpoints? I'm struggling to think of any.


Just the way they added to the Marauder etc. But you are right highest one I see is 10 Hard points on the battlemaster. Would have to see how PGI handles it though.

Kodiak has 8 + 4 that would be the largest number of Hard points in the game (without mixing pods). Or is that even higher?

What would be wrong with LPL 2x SRM 6 (A) and an AC20? (all in the torsos)

Edited by reign, 15 January 2016 - 08:44 AM.


#655 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:47 AM

View Postreign, on 15 January 2016 - 08:39 AM, said:


Just the way they added to the Marauder etc. But you are right highest one I see is 10 Hard points on the battlemaster. Would have to see how PGI handles it though.

Kodiak has 8 + 4 that would be the largest number of Hard points in the game (without mixing pods). Or is that even higher?

What would be wrong with LPL 2x SRM 6 (A) and an AC20? (all in the torsos)


A UAC20? it would be okay I guess. You can do that on an Orion IIC too. I don't know, I'm not getting my hopes up for the Kodiak, it will be just okay. Probably a good brawler but that's about it.

#656 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:50 AM

View PostIronClaws, on 15 January 2016 - 07:24 AM, said:

The Executioner is my favorite Clan Assault in MWO (so far) and any self-respecting Ghost Bear warrior should become proficient with it.

unless said warrior doesn't do Assaults.

View Postpbiggz, on 15 January 2016 - 07:28 AM, said:


I'd play the thing more if masc were worth the tonnage or I could remove it for more firepower.

on Assaults MASC actually works decent. Though not as it should. On Mediums? Utter trash.

View PostWidowmaker1981, on 15 January 2016 - 07:44 AM, said:


To be fair, i think all the people saying no in that thread are the diehard IS players who say no to the idea of any buff to any clan mech ever.

or just obstinate idiots.

#657 reign

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 459 posts

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:51 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 15 January 2016 - 08:47 AM, said:


A UAC20? it would be okay I guess. You can do that on an Orion IIC too. I don't know, I'm not getting my hopes up for the Kodiak, it will be just okay. Probably a good brawler but that's about it.



Well the other option is to Gauss and LPL in the torsos.. And poke with that shoulder (since the B is mounted really high).

Edited by reign, 15 January 2016 - 08:52 AM.


#658 Pariah Devalis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Clan Cat
  • The Clan Cat
  • 7,655 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationAboard the NCS True Path

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:52 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 15 January 2016 - 08:49 AM, said:

unless said warrior doesn't do Assaults.


I find it is helpful to be cross trained and proficient on all classes. You only know a class once you've stomped around it in for 1609.334 meters. Posted Image

Quote

on Assaults MASC actually works decent. Though not as it should. On Mediums? Utter trash.


QFT.

Edited by Pariah Devalis, 15 January 2016 - 08:52 AM.


#659 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:54 AM

View PostTamwulf, on 15 January 2016 - 07:38 AM, said:

I'd like to see a Maruader IIC, Warhammer IIC, and Locust IIC.

Otherwise, how about some second line Battle Mechs? Russ said 3053, but there are some 3058 Mechs in the game, so... I'm confused a bit.

TRO Date (3025, 3050, 3055, 3058, etc) is just the "stardate" that TRO was published. It has little to nothing to do with when the mechs found within were actualyl first built, especially Clan Mechs, as with those it has to do when the IS first reported on them more than anything.

For actual production dates, try the official mech timeline from the publisher
http://www.masterunitlist.info/

#660 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 15 January 2016 - 08:54 AM

View Postreign, on 15 January 2016 - 08:51 AM, said:



Well the other option is to Gauss and LPL in the torsos.. And poke with that shoulder (since the B is mounted really high).


Yeah you could do that, could also through some mediums on one of the arms too for some more kick. Like I said, I don't think it will be terrible. I just look at the things you could do with it and it feels like its not really an ideal setup for anything other than brawling. Maybe 8 cSPLs in the arms to supplement the brawly torso weapons. Would probably work.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users