69 replies to this topic

[Tina Benoit]

If you're interested, take a read!

http://www.mmorpg.co...re/10559/page/1

[MechPorn]

Nice to see a positive review.

[RoboPatton]

Tina Benoit, on 09 February 2016 - 03:42 PM, said:

If you're interested, take a read!

http://www.mmorpg.co...re/10559/page/1

I am, and I did.

Not too shabby.

Edited by RoboPatton, 09 February 2016 - 03:48 PM.

[Johnny Z]

That's an accurate review. As a new player I would say the same or even had I taken a long break.

[XX Sulla XX]

Thanks for posting this Tina.

[FupDup]

It's funny that in the right-side column along the review text, it shows a site rating of 5.4 for the game and user rating of 7.3.

[Sader325]

Uh... 5.3 is terrible?

[MeiSooHaityu]

Cool review. Thanks for posting.

[nehebkau]

Ty Tiny Tina.

[Krovik]

This review doesn't seem to be very positive for MWO.

[Y E O N N E]

Quote

Hawken is a MUCH better game.

Ha!

Not a bad review, thanks for posting!

[Johnny Z]

Krovik, on 09 February 2016 - 04:45 PM, said:

This review doesn't seem to be very positive for MWO.

Seemed positive to me. The comments about VOIP(it doesn't get used much and comm wheel would be better. ) and a couple other things I don't agree with much, but over all it was very accurate.

[Bonger Bob]

wow a PGI pep on the forums ?!?!?! WTF ??? lol

must be lost or hit the wrong key....

[TheArisen]

Yeonne Greene, on 09 February 2016 - 04:45 PM, said:

Ha!

Not a bad review, thanks for posting!

That's not a quote from the review...

Sader325, on 09 February 2016 - 04:32 PM, said:

Uh... 5.3 is terrible?

Which is odd because the review is pretty positive aside from wanting CW to be developed faster

[Bonger Bob]

TheArisen, on 09 February 2016 - 05:03 PM, said:

Which is odd because the review is pretty positive aside from wanting CW to be developed faster

no more odd than a 4 year old game receiving a game review.

If PGI are excited about this write up, its just sad......

at least the review seemed honest in some respects, though it does come off as sponsored and far too late. I'm conflicted about it being reviewed by an RPG site, it doesn't say much for RPG's ......but 5.3 seems fair.

[Y E O N N E]

TheArisen, on 09 February 2016 - 05:03 PM, said:

That's not a quote from the review...

It's from the comments under it, and I found it humerus!

[Johnny Gorbachev]

No one reads reviews anymore, they just look at the score. Seems positive, but score isn't. Thats enough to not entice new players.

Edited by Johnny Gorbachev, 09 February 2016 - 06:34 PM.

[Sandpit]

Thought it was a goof review personally. Nice to see you linking these kinds of thing Tina.

[DAYLEET]

I don't know why they refer to MWO as a MOBA. Makes no sense to me, it's a fps with enhanced damage system.

[Brandarr Gunnarson]

Largely positive review with some directed criticism.

+1 for making headlines!