Bishop Steiner, on 05 June 2016 - 07:48 PM, said:
No. That's just opening up things to cults of personalities and agendas. It might extend things for a select few for a time (could just see the Mt Tryhard Council) but i'd rather the whole thing just die rather than stagger on as some undead abomination.
Bishop Steiner, on 05 June 2016 - 07:53 PM, said:
Scout Derek I think is underestimating PGIs culpability in their own PR problems... but he's not wrong in that we the community are a fractious bunch of whiny SoBs, too.
You hit it here. Everyone wants a democracy so that their "voice can be heard" but PGI can hear because everyone else is screaming what they want heard. So they offered a Council.... IE a Representative Republic, but like politics, people can't figure out who to elect. "If XXXX is elected, then I'm gone. But if YYYY is elected he's gone too." (Sound like what's playing out in the US right now?)
Simple solution would be to have in-game polls. Ask simple questions with 3-4 answers and let the player base vote on direction. If there is a clear cut winner, then that's the direction it should go. If it's a close call, then a decision is needed to go with A or B or hold the status quo for the time being. Everyone's voice gets heard in a way that allows PGI to hear it and eliminates the comments.
Would everyone be happy? Of course not, but at least it would provide a general direction.
Example:
What major feature would you prefer PGI focus on for the next 3 months?
A) Continue focus on CW

Solaris VII game mode
C) Mech Rescales
Run it for a week or two, the change the question.
But at this point, I have my doubts that PGI can run an actual business.
It's like they are building a motorcycle for us and they decide that, come hell or high water, they are going to put cup holders on the thing even if we don't ask for them.