

3 Pv
#1
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:35 AM
Also, given all the glitches and issues, it looks like they put it in all that time ago and then never worked on it again
#2
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:38 AM
The whole thing is wonky. Given the spirit of the event.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 03 September 2016 - 06:41 AM.
#3
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:41 AM
#4
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:47 AM
Kanil, on 03 September 2016 - 06:41 AM, said:
Given its what made them take the "Mech Simulator" tag off the web site, they thought it was pretty bad too
Also; if youd played the previous MW titles multiplayer, youd know WHY there was such a negative reaction to it
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 03 September 2016 - 06:48 AM.
#5
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:47 AM
Kanil, on 03 September 2016 - 06:41 AM, said:
well you know "PGI lies",
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 03 September 2016 - 06:47 AM, said:
Also; if youd played the previous MW titles multiplayer, youd know WHY there was such a negative reaction to it
So I can guess those other companies got the same reaction from the same players as the ones here in MWO.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 03 September 2016 - 06:52 AM.
#6
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:53 AM
#7
Posted 03 September 2016 - 06:55 AM
#8
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:04 AM
BLOOD WOLF, on 03 September 2016 - 06:47 AM, said:
It only became an issue in multiplayer, which wasn't the main focus of any previous mechwarrior game. Also gaming culture wasn't really structured the same back then, you don't get the same arena for a public outcry with a single player game sold primarily off the shelf in physical copies.
It absolutely did mess up the multiplayer when it was allowed, just like many other things in those titles were quite unbalanced and game breaking if you allowed them in multiplayer, and the community had to organize itself with house rules to adapt the game into a working competitive experience.
So yes, the experience from the multiplayer in previous mechwarrior titles absolutely triggered a huge warning sign for third person view, and the outcry was an attempt to prevent the same problems being inherited by the first dedicated multiplayer mechwarrior game.
It ended up being nerfed into harmlessness, but like so many other things PGI has done there was no demand for it and not apparent positive effects. Just a huge waste of development resources and community goodwill for absolutely zero gain.
Edited by Sjorpha, 03 September 2016 - 07:06 AM.
#9
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:09 AM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 03 September 2016 - 06:53 AM, said:
you're a bit slow on the curb so i'll repeat for the 3rd time. I am not quoting you for a reply, I quote for context. I could care less that you have me on ignore.
Feel free to throw a fit though.
I'll remind you, DON"T REPLY
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 03 September 2016 - 07:09 AM.
#10
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:13 AM
Quote
Hi lil buddy
#11
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:16 AM
Sjorpha, on 03 September 2016 - 07:04 AM, said:
It only became an issue in multiplayer, which wasn't the main focus of any previous mechwarrior game. Also gaming culture wasn't really structured the same back then, you don't get the same arena for a public outcry with a single player game sold primarily off the shelf in physical copies.
It absolutely did mess up the multiplayer when it was allowed, just like many other things in those titles were quite unbalanced and game breaking if you allowed them in multiplayer, and the community had to organize itself with house rules to adapt the game into a working competitive experience.
So yes, the experience from the multiplayer in previous mechwarrior titles absolutely triggered a huge warning sign for third person view, and the outcry was an attempt to prevent the same problems being inherited by the first dedicated multiplayer mechwarrior game.
It ended up being nerfed into harmlessness, but like so many other things PGI has done there was no demand for it and not apparent positive effects. Just a huge waste of development resources and community goodwill for absolutely zero gain.
I don't know about the "like so many other things" the context of a whole sure a few here and there. We can rest assured that the event is more in the joking manner, and will not be emphasized.
It came in, and it went away(not functional), but you know what I mean. However What i was getting at was that while it was a bad move on PGI's part it's was not that big of a deal. From what I remember anyways.
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 03 September 2016 - 07:13 AM, said:
Hi lil buddy
still acting like a child i see. Grow up dude.
Ohh wait he can't see my post, guy must really be slow on the learning curb, that even though he has my post blocked he feels the need to respond to post he can't see.
Freaking hilarious
#12
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:21 AM
#13
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:21 AM
Sjorpha, on 03 September 2016 - 07:04 AM, said:
Just a huge waste of development resources and community goodwill for absolutely zero gain.
People like me get lambasted when I point this out. While It was probably a waste of resources, The "community goodwill is really giving some people here too much credit. I would hold that somebody who is reasonable will look at that and say, Yea what a waste and earned a bit of ire, but that needs to be contrasted with other things they have done.
I never understood the common phenomena of somebody picking and choosing the bits of information they will accept as to affect their "good will". What effects it? how is it determined? and if their are things that lower it, are their not things that can raise it. That is a honest question to ask.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 03 September 2016 - 07:25 AM.
#15
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:27 AM
#16
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:29 AM
Agent1190, on 03 September 2016 - 07:27 AM, said:
well no, because you know.....PGI
#17
Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:34 AM
Instead of asking ppl to test it out on the PTS, we're testing it for fun
#19
Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:23 AM

#20
Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:43 AM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 03 September 2016 - 07:34 AM, said:
Instead of asking ppl to test it out on the PTS, we're testing it for fun
Honestly this is probably the most thorough "test" it has ever gotten from the players.
I don't know why BW feels the need to add commentary to all your posts. It's kind of creepy, and might qualify as harassment.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users