What Would It Take To Bring Previous Players Back?
#1
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:31 PM
What would it take to get former long time regular players back into MWO?
New weapons and content? (Other then Mech Packs, or Map Remakes)
Maybe a advancement in the timeline to introduce new favorite mechs and weapons?
New game engine and general game polish to include more player immersion?
Better community communication?
What are your thoughts?
#2
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:33 PM
Wish I was kidding.
#3
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:37 PM
Too little, too late...
#4
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:41 PM
Mikato Soul, on 07 October 2016 - 05:31 PM, said:
What would it take to get former long time regular players back into MWO?
New weapons and content? (Other then Mech Packs, or Map Remakes)
Maybe a advancement in the timeline to introduce new favorite mechs and weapons?
New game engine and general game polish to include more player immersion?
Better community communication?
What are your thoughts?
Direction.
We can quote a million "I wants" and "what ifs".
All that is shortsighted, myopic and selfish crap.
Not a damn one matters. What does, is the "Leadership" showing they actually have a clue, and a plan, and the balls to stick to it. I don't care if it Esports, an enhanced, Immersive FW, Solaris, PvE. None of that matters if it's haphazard and halfass and subject to change on a whim.
A PGI with a Plan, and the Intestinal Fortitude to actually stick to it and deliver?
THAT would bring me back.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 07 October 2016 - 05:42 PM.
#5
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:45 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 07 October 2016 - 05:41 PM, said:
Direction.
We can quote a million "I wants" and "what ifs".
All that is shortsighted, myopic and selfish crap.
Not a damn one matters. What does, is the "Leadership" showing they actually have a clue, and a plan, and the balls to stick to it. I don't care if it Esports, an enhanced, Immersive FW, Solaris, PvE. None of that matters if it's haphazard and halfass and subject to change on a whim.
A PGI with a Plan, and the Intestinal Fortitude to actually stick to it and deliver?
THAT would bring me back.
Sounds great, yet completely out of character.
People don't change for the most part.
#6
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:48 PM
Don't you trust him?
#7
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:48 PM
Nah jk, i'm with Bishop on the PGI with a plan that actually follows through. But i will add if it only means changes the community overwhelmingly has a positive reaction to and kills ED.
#8
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:48 PM
Lyoto Machida, on 07 October 2016 - 05:45 PM, said:
People don't change for the most part.
never said they would.
I was asked what would bring me back.
THAT would. Because GIVEN their past outings, everything else offered would be halfassed, and abandoned the moment anyone complained. Success requires perseverance. If they aren't willing to put it in, then they might as well pull the plug, or sell the game, now.
#9
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:49 PM
#11
Posted 07 October 2016 - 05:50 PM
This game is just pokemech at this point. There will be no miracle mode or overall Ballance change. There's no direction. Just maintaining the server's and selling packs until their next project (in progress) can keep them going.
I figure maybe 2 years and MWO will be dead. And it'll be the same as today, just with Ghost heat 2.0, and it'll have never been updated since a half thought out release.
*Edit:. Forgot to finish my thought. So why would gamers come back to a game that won't be improving?
Edited by Cabusha, 07 October 2016 - 05:56 PM.
#12
Posted 07 October 2016 - 06:19 PM
El Bandito, on 07 October 2016 - 05:49 PM, said:
The question was what would bring people back - This would would send me running for the hills.
Though not the firing Paul part, because I like that and admittedly just about anyone else would be an 'improvement'... But hiring Bandito to replace him? ... You would think the direction of the game thus far (Read lack thereof) would be derision enough for me, but Mr. Bandito would likely take it in one I'd have issue with, despite finally making headway toward actual goals.
Unless he's part of a team comprised of people that generate valid ideas, don't readily or easily agree with one another and dont degenerate into 'Yes Men' the moment Russ enters the room and pitches an idea tantamount to intercourse with a backwards-facing pinecone.
#13
Posted 07 October 2016 - 06:31 PM
Yeah thats what I would guess, well then until in 4 weeks when I check back again if any new content was released....
#14
Posted 07 October 2016 - 06:33 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 07 October 2016 - 05:50 PM, said:
Why not both?
DrxAbstract, on 07 October 2016 - 06:19 PM, said:
Though not the firing Paul part, because I like that and admittedly just about anyone else would be an 'improvement'... But hiring Bandito to replace him? ... You would think the direction of the game thus far (Read lack thereof) would be derision enough for me, but Mr. Bandito would likely take it in one I'd have issue with, despite finally making headway toward actual goals.
Unless he's part of a team comprised of people that generate valid ideas, don't readily or easily agree with one another and dont degenerate into 'Yes Men' the moment Russ enters the room and pitches an idea tantamount to intercourse with a backwards-facing pinecone.
You know what they say--If you try to please everyone, you will end up pleasing no one. Dunno what is the issue you have in particular though. The moment Russ offers a silly idea in my balancing department, he can kiss my arse and fire me. At least I would be left with "managerial work experience in gaming company", in my resume.
Edited by El Bandito, 07 October 2016 - 06:43 PM.
#15
Posted 07 October 2016 - 06:35 PM
Long Term Goals - Basically I need PGI to say we are doing these and it's our FOCUS.
- Engine has been at its limits since closed beta - New Engine (Show me you have faith in your product)
- Match Replay
- Stand Alone Offline PVE with online features - We need new revenue streams other than mechs
- Solaris
Once these have been established we can then turn on FW again adding depth by using PVE assets. Using A.I. to fill slow times and ghost drops. Pilot development that starts in PVE and endgame becomes FW. This helps new users learn the game before becoming fodder.
Short term - I'll spend money and play again but back to my usual off and on spurts and you won't gain back my full support until long term goals are announced.
- Mad Cat MK II
Edited by Imperius, 07 October 2016 - 06:38 PM.
#16
Posted 07 October 2016 - 06:43 PM
this ship has made its bed now they are laying in it.
to answer the question though, if they took mw2, 3, 4 and put them all together then i may consider looking playing again.
just look at this asinine power draw thing its on pts 5 now? lol? i cant help but think of that guys signature with the donkey face that says "PGI - we really know what were doing"
#17
Posted 07 October 2016 - 07:02 PM
Higher TTK
New maps
Better MM
Just a few things, the list would be extensive though id imagine!
Edit: Maybe more Devs and Russ responding on the forums instead of Twitbager! Make the community feel like its involed in the games development.
Edited by Kharonn, 07 October 2016 - 07:07 PM.
#18
Posted 07 October 2016 - 07:06 PM
El Bandito, on 07 October 2016 - 06:33 PM, said:
Why not both?
You know what they say--If you try to please everyone, you will end up pleasing no one. Dunno what is the issue you have in particular though. The moment Russ offers a silly idea in my balancing department, he can kiss my arse and fire me. At least I would be left with "managerial work experience in gaming company", in my resume.
In Russ's case he is trying to please no one (but himself) and so far is exceeding beyond his wildest expectations.
I'm too disappointed in their performance overall to ever convert back to a spender, which is what we are really talking about. Coming back as a non-spender makes little to no difference to PGIs bottom line, so they'd have to find a way to convert me to a spender which I'm thinking is going to be next to impossible.
As it is, I'm currently trying to come up with creative ways to spend all my c-bills since I have a limited number of mechbays, many of which were free and I don't like selling off mechs to open slots.
Maybe I could buy all the arty in the world?
#19
Posted 07 October 2016 - 07:10 PM
There is no Good Social aspect to MWO I remember listening to my dad and uncle play MechWarrior4 on the MSN game zone laughing and chatting to players all over the world I was like 7 and they let me play in some cool battles in the lobby rooms that is what hooked me on giving MWO a try but I soon found out this game really sucks compared to my earlier experiences with MechWarrio4.
If MWO mechs and game played like MechWarrior4 Mercenaries did and had all the Social aspects that game had plus some good old PVE with Co-op play I might come back and try MWO again but its hard to like a game that actually turns away people that want to play games as friends other than pay for it like the private play does.
I still play MechWarrior4 Vengeance and MechWarrior4 Mercenaries on a private IP family server my uncle runs and we can play for hours laugh chat and have fun. It might not have the fancy sound or graphics MWO has but it has something better just good old plain fun stomping around in mechs that take a lot of damage and are easy to control and everyone just enjoying there game play.
Edited by GBxGhostRyder, 07 October 2016 - 07:14 PM.
#20
Posted 07 October 2016 - 07:19 PM
TLBFestus, on 07 October 2016 - 07:06 PM, said:
I'm too disappointed in their performance overall to ever convert back to a spender, which is what we are really talking about. Coming back as a non-spender makes little to no difference to PGIs bottom line, so they'd have to find a way to convert me to a spender which I'm thinking is going to be next to impossible.
As it is, I'm currently trying to come up with creative ways to spend all my c-bills since I have a limited number of mechbays, many of which were free and I don't like selling off mechs to open slots.
Maybe I could buy all the arty in the world?
Buy all the modules, and engines?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users