Jump to content

Who Or What Will Save The Warhawk?


65 replies to this topic

#61 Corrado

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 817 posts
  • Locationfinale emilia, italy

Posted 24 December 2016 - 08:50 AM

warhawk does have a plenty of funny builds, from 2UAC20, 2UAC10+ERPPC, 1GAUSS+lasers, 2UAC10+3SRM6 and a hot and funny 90ish LPLs+MLs+SRM6 build.

the marauder is a better tank for sure tho.

#62 NRP

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 3,949 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 24 December 2016 - 08:55 AM

This thread is strange. In my experience playing solo, I see as many, if not more, Warhawks than I do Battlemaster, Banshees, or even non-KDK 3 Kodiaks. It seems people still run them regularly in the QP queue. Are you guys saying it isn't viable on the competitive scene? If so, you can probably make that statement for just about every mech in the game.

#63 Corrado

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 817 posts
  • Locationfinale emilia, italy

Posted 24 December 2016 - 09:11 AM

View PostNRP, on 24 December 2016 - 08:55 AM, said:

This thread is strange. In my experience playing solo, I see as many, if not more, Warhawks than I do Battlemaster, Banshees, or even non-KDK 3 Kodiaks. It seems people still run them regularly in the QP queue. Are you guys saying it isn't viable on the competitive scene? If so, you can probably make that statement for just about every mech in the game.


wait. LPL wubmasters and wubshees are WAY better performing than the warhawks. what people run in QP doesnt mean squat. since there are really many KDK-3 scoring 100 damage, that doesnt mean KDK-3 sucks.

#64 Moldur

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,241 posts

Posted 24 December 2016 - 09:17 AM

Nothing.

#65 NRP

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 3,949 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 24 December 2016 - 09:26 AM

View PostCorrado, on 24 December 2016 - 09:11 AM, said:


wait. LPL wubmasters and wubshees are WAY better performing than the warhawks. what people run in QP doesnt mean squat. since there are really many KDK-3 scoring 100 damage, that doesnt mean KDK-3 sucks.

I don't understand your point. I never said the KDK sucks, and I never said Warhawks are better than Battlemasters and Banshees. I merely said in QP it seems a lot of people haven't got the message about Warhawks sucking because a lot of people still run them.

As for QP being irrelevant, I would image the player population in QP is much larger than in any other queue. Which is why I asked if the point of this thread was from a competition standpoint.

#66 Corrado

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 817 posts
  • Locationfinale emilia, italy

Posted 24 December 2016 - 10:10 AM

View PostNRP, on 24 December 2016 - 09:26 AM, said:

I don't understand your point. I never said the KDK sucks, and I never said Warhawks are better than Battlemasters and Banshees. I merely said in QP it seems a lot of people haven't got the message about Warhawks sucking because a lot of people still run them.

As for QP being irrelevant, I would image the player population in QP is much larger than in any other queue. Which is why I asked if the point of this thread was from a competition standpoint.


oh ok. was just a misunderstanding then. yes warhawk is subpar, yet there are some builds that works. if any, making use of all those hardwired heatsinks, and no arms to twist shield with, means it should run suppress weapons (UAC spam with SRMS usually works) like a good 2UAC10 3SRM6 build.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users