warhawk does have a plenty of funny builds, from 2UAC20, 2UAC10+ERPPC, 1GAUSS+lasers, 2UAC10+3SRM6 and a hot and funny 90ish LPLs+MLs+SRM6 build.
the marauder is a better tank for sure tho.


Who Or What Will Save The Warhawk?
Started by Clownwarlord, Dec 22 2016 05:17 PM
65 replies to this topic
#61
Posted 24 December 2016 - 08:50 AM
#62
Posted 24 December 2016 - 08:55 AM
This thread is strange. In my experience playing solo, I see as many, if not more, Warhawks than I do Battlemaster, Banshees, or even non-KDK 3 Kodiaks. It seems people still run them regularly in the QP queue. Are you guys saying it isn't viable on the competitive scene? If so, you can probably make that statement for just about every mech in the game.
#63
Posted 24 December 2016 - 09:11 AM
NRP, on 24 December 2016 - 08:55 AM, said:
This thread is strange. In my experience playing solo, I see as many, if not more, Warhawks than I do Battlemaster, Banshees, or even non-KDK 3 Kodiaks. It seems people still run them regularly in the QP queue. Are you guys saying it isn't viable on the competitive scene? If so, you can probably make that statement for just about every mech in the game.
wait. LPL wubmasters and wubshees are WAY better performing than the warhawks. what people run in QP doesnt mean squat. since there are really many KDK-3 scoring 100 damage, that doesnt mean KDK-3 sucks.
#64
Posted 24 December 2016 - 09:17 AM
Nothing.
#65
Posted 24 December 2016 - 09:26 AM
Corrado, on 24 December 2016 - 09:11 AM, said:
wait. LPL wubmasters and wubshees are WAY better performing than the warhawks. what people run in QP doesnt mean squat. since there are really many KDK-3 scoring 100 damage, that doesnt mean KDK-3 sucks.
I don't understand your point. I never said the KDK sucks, and I never said Warhawks are better than Battlemasters and Banshees. I merely said in QP it seems a lot of people haven't got the message about Warhawks sucking because a lot of people still run them.
As for QP being irrelevant, I would image the player population in QP is much larger than in any other queue. Which is why I asked if the point of this thread was from a competition standpoint.
#66
Posted 24 December 2016 - 10:10 AM
NRP, on 24 December 2016 - 09:26 AM, said:
I don't understand your point. I never said the KDK sucks, and I never said Warhawks are better than Battlemasters and Banshees. I merely said in QP it seems a lot of people haven't got the message about Warhawks sucking because a lot of people still run them.
As for QP being irrelevant, I would image the player population in QP is much larger than in any other queue. Which is why I asked if the point of this thread was from a competition standpoint.
As for QP being irrelevant, I would image the player population in QP is much larger than in any other queue. Which is why I asked if the point of this thread was from a competition standpoint.
oh ok. was just a misunderstanding then. yes warhawk is subpar, yet there are some builds that works. if any, making use of all those hardwired heatsinks, and no arms to twist shield with, means it should run suppress weapons (UAC spam with SRMS usually works) like a good 2UAC10 3SRM6 build.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users