Gas Guzzler, on 29 March 2017 - 10:00 AM, said:
Lies, they both have the same level of max armor unless you are counting on quirks. The HBR also gets to strip arms for tonnage too, so gets more out of its higher engine.
*sigh*
From Sarna.net:
http://www.sarna.net...llbringer_(Loki)
"The
Hellbringer is a very widespread design developed by
Clan Hell's Horses. However, due to its poor armor, the
Hellbringer is often passed over for more robust OmniMechs."
"Though it has vast firepower at its disposal, the design is not particularly durable, mounting a mere eight tons of Standard armor, and the
Hellbringer is not particularly suitable for defensive situations or extended engagements."
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Rifleman_IIC
"One of the first upgrades to the design was maxing out its protection, with eleven tons of
Ferro-Fibrous armor. The vaunted anti-aircraft 'Mech is aided in its role by the inclusion of an
Active Probe. To compensate for the loss of speed, the
IIC mounts three
jump jets that can propel the 'Mech up to ninety meters in one leap."
From battletech.hpg.ru :
On the Rifleman IIC 2
"By using a larger 260-rated engine, it retains the expected performance envelope of a standard Rifleman and keeps the jump jets, which are not on the Inner sphere version. The Clans eliminated the ferro-fibrous armor, which forces the ´Mech to carry two tons more armor for the same amount of effective cover."
Edited by Arnold The Governator, 29 March 2017 - 10:12 AM.