dario03, on 04 April 2017 - 12:58 PM, said:
The MGs were at their best for 2 weeks but they were good after that for 301 days. That is the time period that I am talking about, especially since the Ember wasn't even out until over half way through that. So it wasn't 2 weeks, it was over 4 months of history.
Sorry, I had the wrong reference date for the Ember's release.
Anyway, define 'good'. We have comparable damage with less cone and... They're still garbage, IMO. Devoting half your payload to them on a section of the Mech that can't hit anything beyond the most gradual of terrain gradients with midriff-mounted weapons all-round that required extensive facetime (Mguns) and are inherently poor performers against 100+ KPH targets (Mguns and Mlas), the Ember was, and still is, nothing to write home about. So yes, depending on who you talk to, a 4 Month heyday... Maybe. If it wasn't for lopsided quirks and the Jenner's huge CT the entire Firstarter lineup likely never would have seen sparkle of the spotlight.
Though some of my best Light matches were in Firestarters, most were in my Jenners... But... 886 FS9 drops versus 3,433 in the JR7 (Excluding the handful of CB stat wipes), I suppose it's a bit disproportionate... Not that it matters, given PGI's demonstrably abhorrent abandonment of the Light class as a whole for the last 2 years (Some of them even longer). Can't really call the JR7-F my favorite nerfed Mech because its fall from grace was due to utter neglect throughout the evolution of MWO... Can a Mech qualify as 'nerfed' simply for being ignored by the devs?