Module Refund Poll
#41
Posted 28 April 2017 - 10:28 AM
But considering I spent over $1000 on this game purchasing those Clan mechs, it would be a kindness to reward me with CBills.
It would be a strike to the face if PGI decided to pay me back and the massive amount of money I have spent on this game by saying, "here are some useless tokens and a fraction of the C-Bills you earned over the past year on modules."
#42
Posted 28 April 2017 - 11:21 AM
Jikil, on 26 April 2017 - 08:39 PM, said:
PGI has plainly stated they aren't going to hand out a billion cbills and I think this is why the first skill tree never went live.
GSP is a pretty good idea in that modules just increase mech power and thats what the new skill tree does exactly.
They are not "handing out" cbills. We earned these cbills and spent them on items that they are removing from the game. We now have no cbills and no module. Or rather, a fraction of the cbills and no modules. Some people buy cbills with cash. There are cbill packages for cash lets not forget. These people will have now spent money in items that are being taken away and being given back pennies on the dollar.
These Cbills were earned or purchased via cash. Its fundamentally wrong to not give them back.
#43
Posted 28 April 2017 - 02:11 PM
#44
Posted 28 April 2017 - 03:46 PM
I'm a scrub player from last September that went 'cheapskate' with single modules and a lot of swapping. On the PTS, I'm getting back enough GSP to fill out 12 new mechs if I want, which is great. For me, what they had in mind is a good deal (math on value CBills / Exp) and I want to keep it. I do NOT want to lose it.
What I would like to see is a 5 to 7 day window of time before the Tree Patch Launch where ALL players can sell ANY modules they own for FULL Cbill value. Then the patch rolls out, refunds happen as planned, and we go forward.
"But what about the people who aren't able to log on in time?" -- 5 to 7 days as a window is plenty of time for active players. It's not perfect but I think it's a pretty good compromise.
#45
Posted 28 April 2017 - 04:00 PM
And IF not both then just C-bills...
#46
Posted 28 April 2017 - 04:16 PM
MajCyric, on 28 April 2017 - 04:00 PM, said:
And IF not both then just C-bills...
You're already getting any GXP you spent back. I think it's a total of 639,400 GXP to unlock every single module in the game.
#47
Posted 28 April 2017 - 04:38 PM
2. C-bills replace money in many cases.
3. Grinding money is called work = not fun.
#48
Posted 28 April 2017 - 06:27 PM
Personally for me, this refund system seems OK. I get the ability to skill up a large chunk of my mechs and I'm not having to pay cbills for it. I do respect others may not be in the same place, so I could support some options to allow choice to get some level of cbills back if they have excess. That does seem like a pretty easy option that PGI could add in for folks in that situation.
#49
Posted 28 April 2017 - 06:48 PM
I would rather have my c-bills back than skill points that could potentially unlock as many as 233 mechs when I only own 73.
#50
Posted 28 April 2017 - 09:10 PM
I can see myself keeping about 15000 GSP for future mechs so I can get the skill nodes I want unlocked immediately. I would appreciate an in-game option to convert GSP into C-bills (forfeiting the XP component) at any time if the refund system of the current test build is implemented. Hopefully that would let the refund script run to give everyone GSP and then those that want C-bills could easily convert them whenever they wanted post patch.
The latest PTS refund seemed to be quite fair and take into account the majority of the player base - giving players the ability to "master" their currently mastered mechs at no cost using HSP, converting consumables back to C-bills/MC, and converting modules into GSP based on a calculation of their C-bills value which is a generous calculation if you take into account the "free" XP component of it. Some of us just don't care to have a balance of 40000+ GSP sitting on our accounts for the next 10 years.
#51
Posted 29 April 2017 - 02:56 AM
GSP was a pretty good idea given the fact that the original plan would have antagonized a lot of the older players who have not bought modules for each and every one of their mechs....It doesn't nuke the in-game economy to oblivion the way handing out billions of c-bills to everyone would have.
#52
Posted 29 April 2017 - 04:01 AM
Slambot, on 29 April 2017 - 02:56 AM, said:
GSP was a pretty good idea given the fact that the original plan would have antagonized a lot of the older players who have not bought modules for each and every one of their mechs....It doesn't nuke the in-game economy to oblivion the way handing out billions of c-bills to everyone would have.
Gsp are to *unlock* nodes on any mech you want, but you can NOT use them for reactivating nodes(400xp cost)
Insta unlock everything. For the next 600 mechs to be released WOW. Maybe I WANT to level them by PLAYING the game? To get a feeling for how the mech reacts? Or to.. just play.. maybe?
What in-game economy are you talking about? There is none, since no player can interact with other players by trading or anything else.
Those billions of cbills are already there, just in form of modules. What pgi essentially wants to do is to DELETE billions of cbills for no reason except for robbing us YEARS of grinding that money - which a decent amount of players will NOT accept. Only pgi doesnt understand that obviously
Edited by Meihru, 29 April 2017 - 04:04 AM.
#53
Posted 29 April 2017 - 05:55 AM
Slambot, on 29 April 2017 - 02:56 AM, said:
GSP was a pretty good idea given the fact that the original plan would have antagonized a lot of the older players who have not bought modules for each and every one of their mechs....It doesn't nuke the in-game economy to oblivion the way handing out billions of c-bills to everyone would have.
Exactly! I'm actually stoked about the GSP. I won't have to level Mechs for a long, long time!
Also, since Nodes can be purchased and kept in that Mechs Skills Inventory, it means that you have extra SP you can use on each Mech. For example, my BLR was already getting 91 nodes refunded. With my mountain of GSP, I can add an extra 30 nodes to it, bringing it to a total of 121 nodes. Now I can run the XL400 meta, or I can run the STD340 meta, whichever I prefer.
I actually am pretty thrilled with PGI's refund scheme this time around! I hated it the first time, but I think they really knocked it out of the park with this latest revamp!
#54
Posted 29 April 2017 - 06:15 AM
But I guess no one thought of that.
#55
Posted 29 April 2017 - 06:19 AM
Outcast1six, on 29 April 2017 - 06:15 AM, said:
But I guess no one thought of that.
I get 3 times that much, blah blah.
Of course we think of the fact we don't have to spend cbills or xp for skills, that's the whole point of gsp after all. Thing is, we can't spent it on anything else either, no matter the fact we paid cbills to get modules in th first place.
#56
Posted 30 April 2017 - 08:16 AM
Meihru, on 29 April 2017 - 06:19 AM, said:
I get 3 times that much, blah blah.
Of course we think of the fact we don't have to spend cbills or xp for skills, that's the whole point of gsp after all. Thing is, we can't spent it on anything else either, no matter the fact we paid cbills to get modules in th first place.
I'm not sure you're putting 2 and 2 together. With the GSP you KEEP the c-bills spent unlocking nodes. So I fail to see the logic in your argument. I get the c-bills back in savings mastering other mechs. See fair to me.
For the record I voted that it would be a mix of GSP and c-bills. I would like the choice and I wouldn't look to force anyone else not have a choice. Either a sliding scale during the refund or the option to sell off a portion of GSP for c-bills. Seems a little unfair to force the GSP people to accept c-bills and visa versa.
By the way, speaking of spending ingame currency. What are you going to do with 2.5 billion c-bills, if you already own so many of the current mechs?
But haters gonna hate.
Edited by Outcast1six, 30 April 2017 - 08:17 AM.
#57
Posted 30 April 2017 - 08:35 AM
Outcast1six, on 30 April 2017 - 08:16 AM, said:
First I would outfit all my mechs with proper engines instead of swapping.. and never have to worry about not having the right engine again.. I just buy as I need.. next I would buy any mechs I don't own and thus buying mech-bays which is a win for PGI.
#58
Posted 30 April 2017 - 11:37 AM
DAEDALOS513, on 30 April 2017 - 08:35 AM, said:
Which you could do with the savings from not having to unlock skill nodes.
IMO I would like to see either a scale with c-bills on one side and GSP on the other. Let people slide the scale to where they want it. Sure, I could use another 100 or 200 million c-bills, like you mentioned, but I have my mechs with the engines I want and I buy mechs packs. So the c-bills aren't that big a deal. Been saving my c-bills for civil war weapons. RAC/5s on everything.
#59
Posted 30 April 2017 - 04:25 PM
#60
Posted 01 May 2017 - 10:05 AM
But would we ever get that? Nope... Between whiners and PGI, anyone who followed the REAL Design Mechanics and fully outfitted their Mechs got horribly screwed.
~D. V. "That kind of junk happening will also be my cue to leave." Devnull
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users