Dwf Gone?
#21
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:08 AM
I dont run full sets, i mix and match to suit my builds. I find being limited to a full set for the Op quirks kidna defeats the purpose of the omni pods.
#22
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:09 AM
Summon3r, on 19 May 2017 - 08:44 AM, said:
um wut?
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 19 May 2017 - 08:50 AM, said:
You mean the Prime right? The C is for 4 cLPL spam.
You can't brawl, but it is really strong, I'm very well aware of the power of the Warhawk.
No, I mean the C.
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 19 May 2017 - 08:53 AM, said:
Now it's better to still go down to the XL375 and put some lasers (SPL or ERSL to taste) for when you push or to deal with lights, humping your leg where you can't deflect down and are using UAC spam. Just no reason to put the 400 on.
So many wasted cbills....
#23
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:11 AM
mogs01gt, on 19 May 2017 - 08:10 AM, said:
#24
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:12 AM
MischiefSC, on 19 May 2017 - 09:09 AM, said:
So many wasted cbills....
I agree, but not everyone did that. Just a note, never go ERSL, SPLs are hands down better unless you really need that 35 extra meter range (which I guarantee you don't).
Edited by Quicksilver Kalasa, 19 May 2017 - 09:13 AM.
#26
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:17 AM
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 19 May 2017 - 08:53 AM, said:
the 2UAC5/10 build is still strong and does hol them in high mounts its still very viable,
Crazywolf77, on 19 May 2017 - 09:05 AM, said:
If you skip the mobility tree completely you are a slowmotion moving big fat target that even can't torso twist and turn propperly.
personally i feel the DWF would be Great with +20CT Structure(no ST Structure)
giving it lots of CT structure will extend the DWFs life with out making it OP,
it would be harder to kill with out being harder to disarm,
#27
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:22 AM
Andi Nagasia, on 19 May 2017 - 09:17 AM, said:
Not really that strong given that is not really impressive firepower for a mech that is as easy to catch out now. I'd prefer the 2 LPL/6 ERML MAD-IIC over it at this point. I'd also prefer the 4 cAC10 (ghost heat penalty is extremely low for cAC10s) and ERPPC Kodiak over that build.
Edited by Quicksilver Kalasa, 19 May 2017 - 09:23 AM.
#28
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:28 AM
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 19 May 2017 - 09:17 AM, said:
like wise i just looked and ended up putting it together lol... that said brawling with cerppc i dunno about that
#30
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:30 AM
Andi Nagasia, on 19 May 2017 - 09:17 AM, said:
personally i feel the DWF would be Great with +20CT Structure(no ST Structure)
giving it lots of CT structure will extend the DWFs life with out making it OP,
it would be harder to kill with out being harder to disarm,
thats part ofthe problem with it though the st's are SOOOOOO easy to take out, id rather see st buffs then ct
#31
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:31 AM
Requiemking, on 19 May 2017 - 09:11 AM, said:
The opposite argument can be said for 100ts. All they have is HP, Armor and firepower. When their mobility equates to a yacht, why take them?
#32
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:36 AM
Summon3r, on 19 May 2017 - 09:30 AM, said:
the problem is that every time ive suggested a Buff to the DWFs STs i get(Clan Apologist want EZ mode)
personally i think the DWF should perhaps get the WHKs buffs(+11CT +18ST) but thats abit of a pipedream now,
Edited by Andi Nagasia, 19 May 2017 - 09:36 AM.
#33
Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:44 AM
Dont use quirks, as u loose them as soon as u swap omipods.
Its still gunna be a primary target due to its size but u may survive a tad logner and be able to move aroudn easier.
Edited by ArmageddonKnight, 19 May 2017 - 09:45 AM.
#34
Posted 19 May 2017 - 10:40 AM
#35
Posted 19 May 2017 - 10:50 AM
#36
Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:13 AM
Lightfoot, on 19 May 2017 - 10:50 AM, said:
But Assaults only get 10% max from armor tree. Which even on a front armor loaded CT on a Dire, is only 11 points of armor.
#37
Posted 19 May 2017 - 01:17 PM
#38
Posted 19 May 2017 - 01:19 PM
#39
Posted 19 May 2017 - 02:06 PM
#40
Posted 19 May 2017 - 02:54 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



























