

Tbr Is Too Weak (Sorry Not Sorry)
#21
Posted 17 July 2017 - 03:52 PM
I found it lesser, than it's reputation. I think it's still good but it has been replaced by the best. I think it has still it's place though.
Should it be buffed? Who knows, the new tech is coming.
#22
Posted 17 July 2017 - 04:03 PM
Though i have to say.
Silly goyim think ill spend money on xl really love to poke at side torsos.
#23
Posted 17 July 2017 - 04:28 PM
The TBR remains a very good mech. It's no longer the go to for the 'best' however, at least for its weight class.
#24
Posted 17 July 2017 - 04:33 PM
As others have said, you must avoid builds with big ears. LRM ears dramatically cut you life span. You can almost predict the results of PUG vs PUG faction matched by the TBR ears. Lots of big TBR ears is a loss for Clan.
Also try to get a jump jet into your TBR builds. Even one is good for mobility and gives options to spread/avoid damage.
Edited by SeventhSL, 17 July 2017 - 04:36 PM.
#25
Posted 17 July 2017 - 04:39 PM
Gimpy117, on 17 July 2017 - 02:57 PM, said:
With maxed out torso twist rate you get 93 turn rate. The Marauder, IS 75 tonner, has 90 for a turn rate before any skills put in. Due note the TBR-C build I have this on has no negative quirks as well, the builds for good laser builds have -10 to -15% off twist rate so it is going to be lower. Prior to the engine desync a TBR laser vomit build with negative quirks has a turn speed of 95.
#26
Posted 17 July 2017 - 05:36 PM
#27
Posted 17 July 2017 - 06:17 PM
HGAK47, on 17 July 2017 - 12:59 PM, said:
The skills of pilot have much more importance than the strength of the mech, i can still see PNT-10P (one of the worst performing mech well recognized) do reasonably well in the right hands, but then that pilot would also do well, or even better on something else.
#28
Posted 17 July 2017 - 06:33 PM
If you say its weak, its prolly more a playstyle thing, the timby (and most clan heavys for that matter) dont really work exceptionally at shorter ranges where its very easy to isolate hitboxes and most IS tech does full dmg to it with way less burn time. I play all my timby builds at mid range of ~500-600m, and most loadouts from the classic LPL+ERML spam to gauss+PPC work fairly well at those ranges.
#29
Posted 17 July 2017 - 07:09 PM
panzer1b, on 17 July 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:
I go with 2x LPL + 5x ERML on Faction Warfare. I ditched the Gauss PPC, it's just too cancerous.
ingramli, on 17 July 2017 - 06:17 PM, said:
The thing is that, it's not a Panther, that reputation the Panther has, the Timber Wolf doesn't have that, so your analogy isn't justified, as TBR is still living up to that reputation of just being a decent mech.
What i can give you is that, TBR from a balance standpoint between mechs, is literal "Meh", it's not very good, it's not very bad, it's that middle ground. Get a good build for a specific role, and it will reasonably reflect your skill level.
Granted, TBR does have gripes, like it's mobility is no longer what it used to be, hell even "against" lore, and the nega-quirks are long overdue. And i would really want that 3B highmount LT for Dakka purposes. But it's far from "unplayable", it's far from the Joke Mech -- that's Urbanmech!
What OP only shows is why he's still on Tier 3, despite PSR upward bias. Because if his build is good, if it's meta yet he still fails, then it's only reflecting his current skill level. He needs to git gud.
#30
Posted 17 July 2017 - 07:23 PM
The6thMessenger, on 17 July 2017 - 07:09 PM, said:
TBR from a balance standpoint between mechs, is literal "Meh", it's not very good, it's not very bad, it's that middle ground.
Yes it is correct, not the worst 75 tonner, but it is no longer the "jack of all trades" which it used to be. Despite the omnipods it have access to, its effectiveness is somehow limited to laser vomit (or half decent PPFLD) due to the locked cXL375 with locked DHS which eat up the tonnage make it hardly OP in almost everything else, and it is no longer a great brawler with the decoupling of twist rate with engine rating....after trying different builds, my conclusion is pretty similar to yours, 2 cLPL + 4~5cERMLs, which is pretty much the best bet for TBR.
Edited by ingramli, 17 July 2017 - 07:26 PM.
#31
Posted 17 July 2017 - 07:30 PM
ingramli, on 17 July 2017 - 07:23 PM, said:
But not "unplayable" like the OP would have us believe. Maybe a mobility boost, and removal of quirks should do nicely.
#32
Posted 17 July 2017 - 07:40 PM
#33
Posted 17 July 2017 - 07:41 PM
NlGHTBlRD, on 17 July 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:
True. Of course that's heretical. You heretic.

SRMs are still reasonably small. Hell my LRM build now goes 2x SSRM6 + 2x LRM15A, so i'm not screwed over both by range, and that large missile rack.
#34
Posted 17 July 2017 - 08:36 PM
When the Mad Cat first came out it was great with it's normal hitboxes, then those got inflated and then players learned to just shoot the two side torsos out. So now the Mad Cat needs a buff, because players are just shooting each side torso out and skipping the CT kill.
In the meantime the way you make hitboxes smaller is with range. GL&GH
#35
Posted 17 July 2017 - 08:37 PM
NlGHTBlRD, on 17 July 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:
It apparently may not be, according Phil on the CW preview stream the threshold is 3, not 2 like we feared. So you can still alpha 2+1 Gauss/Peep, you just can't alpha with 2+2.
Lightfoot, on 17 July 2017 - 08:36 PM, said:
You misspelled "Atlas".
#36
Posted 17 July 2017 - 08:58 PM
Now Clan lasers have longer durations, it TW twists slower and accel and decel is lower, and it runs hotter. IS pilots ask to point out an IS 75 tonner that outperforms it, though the only IS 75 tonners are brawlers. Just go down to the 70 ton Warhammer or Grasshopper or the 65 ton Roughneck or Thunderbolt or the 60 ton Dragon and load up with a mech that can tank much more damage than the Timber Wolf and just strap in with some IS ERLL or LPL and blow the thing's CT or STs out before it gets in ERML range.
Inb4 "muh 81 kph", because going 10kph faster than the IS 70-75kph heavy standard clearly means so much.
To all the people saying git gud, you should git gud and start demolishing TWs with your IS mechs if you think they're as good as you say. Though, with the IS options being stronger (and ridiculously so come Tuesday) its not really like you'd have to get good to win vs a Timber Wolf.
#37
Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:20 PM
I dunno. The TBR's strong suit seems to be mid-close. The cMPL + SRMA wombo-combo is pretty gnarly. It should probably have the remaining negative omnipod quirks removed, perhaps a little bit extra armor for its torso parts, but it's not that far behind the EBJ for laser poke and it's nowhere near "OMG HORRIBLE" in the same way that a CTF-4X is.
#38
Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:23 PM
Dakota1000, on 17 July 2017 - 08:58 PM, said:
I wasn't here when TBR used to be OP -- clan invasion, so yeah, I don't know what you're talking about.
Dakota1000, on 17 July 2017 - 08:58 PM, said:
Yes well, Marauder, Orion (since they are at the same weight range) at max engine would mean that they either have vulnerable side torsi, or have little firepower. A 75-ton clantech on the other hand, it's not as vulnerable as IS XL engine, along with lighter and better weapon systems.
Yes, to be fair, it's a lot more than just "muh 81 kph", rather it still has formidable firepower, decent durability, and THEN the 81 kph from a heavy 375 CXL engine. Because otherwise, the TBR using IS tech would have sucked so bad, just as the IS 75-t mechs would somewhat still suck if they used 375 XL.
I bet even the Rakshasa would need to be god-quirked, and be thankful it's a Battlemech than an Omnimech.
Dakota1000, on 17 July 2017 - 08:58 PM, said:
Well, yes actually. In fact i enjoyed 2x PPC + 2x UAC5 more on a Warhammer. Of course that's meta-jock, one-trick pony, but hey at least i am demolishing TBRs.
Yeonne Greene, on 17 July 2017 - 09:20 PM, said:
Yeah, it's really really really powerful for me. Especially when you get TBR-S with TBR-WAR RT for extra DHS.
Edited by The6thMessenger, 17 July 2017 - 09:24 PM.
#39
Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:26 PM
The6thMessenger, on 17 July 2017 - 09:23 PM, said:
I wasn't here when TBR used to be OP -- clan invasion, so yeah, I don't know what you're talking about.
I bet even the Rakshasa would need to be god-quirked, and be thankful it's a Battlemech than an Omnimech.
Well, yes actually. In fact i enjoyed 2x PPC + 2x UAC5 more on a Warhammer. Of course that's meta-jock, one-trick pony, but hey at least i am demolishing TBRs.
Yeah, it's really really really powerful for me. Especially when you get TBR-S with TBR-WAR RT for extra DHS.
I agree. The TBR is heavily crutched up on clan tech. It would be an embarrassment with those lousy hit boxes and mediocre hardpoints as an IS mech.
I like the WHR. I play it way more than my TBR lately.
Edited by Snowbluff, 17 July 2017 - 09:26 PM.
#40
Posted 17 July 2017 - 09:28 PM
Syffer, on 17 July 2017 - 12:55 PM, said:
Allow me to elaborate. They are too incapable of taking damage, as it's ALL center torso. Their arms don't need armor because they're so small no one hits them. Not that it really matters as, once your CT is gone so are you.
And I'm calling it after months of playing the TBRs pre and post-nerf, the problem lies more with you than the mech.
Too incapable of taking damage? Its a 75 tonner.
All Center torso? Sounds like you don't know how to torso twist.
Arms don't need armor because they're so small? You should really play more than rely on just a "weekend" of experience.
Nice stats btw.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users