#61
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:39 PM
#62
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:41 PM
#63
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:46 PM
#64
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:47 PM
#65
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:50 PM
#66
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:53 PM
Khobai, on 23 July 2017 - 01:02 PM, said:
in other countries if you lose a lawsuit you have to pay the legal costs of the person who won the lawsuit
that prevents frivolous lawsuits
There is an obscure law called Vexatious Litigation and it's in California at least... um where is HG's HQ located again?
https://en.wikipedia...n#United_States
If found guilty of this just 1 time then good luck using any law system again.
That suit carelessly says they own the rights etc. but it should say "Exclusive license" and it mentions the 1995 case...
However that was the case where both FASA and HG rights were found to be non-existent. This left HG only with the televised and video rights. This new lawsuit does not mention Revell as the real owner of the rights to the toys/images/etc. Nor does it mention the agreement HG had with Revell.
I was under the impression that original 1970's agreement between Revell and HG was only good for a couple decades.
Wonder if Hobbico (current owner of Revell) sold those rights to HG, or extended them?
#67
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:54 PM
#68
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:54 PM
#69
Posted 23 July 2017 - 03:59 PM
But that topic title isn't very descriptive...
https://mwomercs.com...the-story-here/
#70
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:04 PM
#71
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:15 PM
JC Daxion, on 23 July 2017 - 02:05 PM, said:
http://www.gettyimag...a%2018%20hornet
Nope,
F14 Tomcat,
the Aircraft was designed with a (Variable-Sweep Wing System) that would allow Ether Speed or Mobility,
this could be changed in flight, to impart the benefits the Pilot may need in action or combat,
this is the RoboTech Fighter,
and this is the Hasbro transformer,
Clearly both are Based on the real Life F-14 Tomcat,
so Clearly Grumman, should be Suing Harmany Gold for using its AirCraft,
as the (Grumman F-14 Tomcat) flew 1970, where as the First episode of (Robotech) came too in 1985,
#72
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:21 PM
Arnold The Governator, on 23 July 2017 - 12:44 PM, said:
Seriously, Canada needs to legalize dueling again so that whoever is behind these mindless quick money lawsuit schemes can get glove slapped.
I really miss the old days:
Things were acted on much more decisively back then.
#73
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:39 PM
Promessa, on 23 July 2017 - 01:54 PM, said:
They do, it's backed by Sony, but they can't seem to keep a director and they don't have a script. Hopefully that fails..
Maybe Sony have given up on it. Rumours are they're looking to do a Starship Troopers movie that's faithful to the book, with the power armour and all that.
#74
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:44 PM
Nope. All I can do is delete. Mods, please lock this topic as repetitive.
Edited by Chados, 23 July 2017 - 04:45 PM.
#75
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:45 PM
Luminis, on 23 July 2017 - 12:49 PM, said:
But I only skimmed some articles on that matter, so that might be a completely false notion...
You don't lose copyright.
You're thinking about trademarks ("Xerox" "Kleenex" etc). If you don't defend your trademarks you lose exclusive use of them. You retail copyright regardless.
#76
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:46 PM
#77
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:47 PM
#78
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:50 PM
I'm laughing so hard now.
But seriously, as a Macross and Battletech fan, **** Harmony Gold. They issued a cease and desist order to a Brazilian director that was working on a Macross fan-film that he was gonna release to the world for free. Yeah. They are ******* scumbags and I hope PGI punches them in the face (legally) like our Atlas's should be able to do in the game to other mechs.
#79
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:53 PM
CK16, on 23 July 2017 - 02:54 PM, said:
No.
Aggravated Assault Mech, on 23 July 2017 - 03:37 PM, said:
It indicates that Harmony Gold is probably aware of the dubiousness of their claim on Macross designs and isn't confident of their chances in court. After all, Hasbro continued to produce and sell the offending design- what claim does Harmony Gold really have if that's the case?.
HBS/CGL/PGI probably won't "use" anything because the case will probably end up the same- dismissed or discreetly settled out of court. The risk of going to court is far, far greater to Harmony Gold than it is to Weisman and friends.
This. I figure HG is just trying for scare tactics/hoping to score an easy settlement, and while you don't lose copyright for failing to.defend it, failure to defend it does hurt you in unclear cases, as victory in IP cases like this is almost entirely based on opinion vs. hard rule of law.
If HG actually goes to court and loses, then that would build precedent that could be used in later cases - they'd lose the last tiny bit of ground to stand on.
#80
Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:51 PM
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users