Verilligo, on 05 October 2017 - 12:39 PM, said:
I think the idea here is that yes, you can use other things. But realistically, using other things is hampering yourself. If you do well with other stuff, you'd do even BETTER with the meta. You're focused on having fun. This is focused on winning and nothing else matters.
I don't know if it is an issue of the use of other things than meta is hampering yourself, as much as using a meta build when combined with the play style that anonymous223 is advocating is the meta itself. His own words:
anonymous223, on 15 September 2017 - 12:09 AM, said:
brawling works for the mid level player that has equipped whole bunch of srms.
but if you really want to get better, hide, peek, alpha, hide, peek, alpha.
push does not exist, the team advances when the enemies get out traded and start hiding.
If enemies hide from the start, just spam air strikes, no need to walk in like a bunch of sheeps and get farmed.
and at the end, comp builds almost do not differ from faction play ones, the only exception is no radar derp and more survival.
The story of the different play stiles works until your skill level is 7 out of 10
after that, there is only the meta.
This is not advocating mere meta builds but a very specific mode of play in which to use those meta builds.
And that then leads to the point MovinTarget is making (I think): We have hundreds of mechs and thousands of potential builds. A good player can make most if not all work, and might try them all just for the fun of it. Maybe he/she takes it in the shorts occasionally as the cost of playing with all that variety but that is in fact the fun. But the meta player (going now to anon's position) won't bother. The meta player knows what is optimal and is not going to take something lesser. The meta player plays the best build that can be played and that is most likely going to lead to a win in that mode, on that map with that team. And that is the point. Variety per se doesn't win. But the meta mechs with the meta builds used in the manner advocated will make it more likely that you will.
To me this is all academic and fascinating. My own "meta" is represented by mechs and builds that allow me to over come my own personal shortcomings of shaky hands and arthritis, so I will never be good playing the trading game across the map in the peak and hide manner advocated, (I can't keep the reticle on target sufficiently to hit a component let alone on the center of mass consistently) so aspiring to the "mid level" tier of play as a brawler is the best I can hope for. That, plus I too like variety and will bring a bad build for no other reason than it looks good. Meh.
Still I really am enjoying learning more about this higher level of play perspective from you folks. Good stuff. (I once advocated that you folks should be required to do after action interviews after MRBC matches and them transcribe them for publication on the front page of the forums and reddit. I think it would increase the level of play all around.)
Edited by Bud Crue, 05 October 2017 - 02:01 PM.