

Anyone Think The Atlas Could Use An Armor Buff?
#1
Posted 15 February 2018 - 12:15 PM
#2
Posted 15 February 2018 - 12:28 PM
#3
Posted 15 February 2018 - 12:31 PM
#4
Posted 15 February 2018 - 12:43 PM
#7
Posted 15 February 2018 - 12:56 PM
N0ni, on 15 February 2018 - 12:55 PM, said:
Hmm I haven't tried MRMs on the Atlas yet.
I took the AC20/SRM build out for a spin the other night and it was a force for a few matches. Then I got Polar and didn't have enough patience to pull it off, but man those previous matches were fun. Miss that torso twist speed though.
#8
Posted 15 February 2018 - 01:19 PM
The Dire Wolves also needs buffs, at least half of what the Altas got/ get.
Well ANY 100 tonner at least needs considerable armor and structure buffs, maybe even some baked in - crit chance taken too against lights and crit weapons.
if not mobility buffs, armor/ structure buffs is the way to go.
#9
Posted 15 February 2018 - 01:21 PM
#10
Posted 15 February 2018 - 01:57 PM
#11
Posted 15 February 2018 - 02:00 PM
Yosharian, on 15 February 2018 - 01:57 PM, said:
its not really power creep though since the atlas is an underperformer
its only power creep when you make the best mechs better. Making a mediocre mech better isnt power creep. Its just balancing. and the Atlas is the very definition of mediocre.
Turning its structure quirks into armor quirks still doesnt give it quite enough of an advantage over the annihilator. I think the Atlas should have both armor and structure quirks.
So instead of +31a/+28a/+28a
Give it something more along the lines of +26a,+13s/+23a,+12s/+23a,+12s
Quote
yep. not sure the direwolf needs armor buffs. but it at least needs structure buffs.
give the direwolf +16s/+14s/+14s and see how that goes
Edited by Khobai, 15 February 2018 - 02:17 PM.
#13
Posted 15 February 2018 - 02:19 PM
Quote
+15 armor to each arm should do it
it should depend on the arm
the 4 energy + 1 ballistic arm of the direwolf should get the smallest bonus
#15
Posted 15 February 2018 - 03:22 PM
Quote
no lol
why would you ever use the 1E arm for example if the 4E+1B arm gets the same structure quirks
#16
Posted 15 February 2018 - 03:24 PM
#17
Posted 15 February 2018 - 03:25 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 15 February 2018 - 02:17 PM, said:
Maybe just armor on the arms and structure everywhere else.
+15 armor to each arm should do it

Needs at least +8 armour on torso and +12 CT when you think its competing against a Anni which is almost 2 DWFs if skilled properly.
#18
Posted 15 February 2018 - 03:26 PM
Khobai, on 15 February 2018 - 03:22 PM, said:
FTFY
I wouldn't.
If you want to make it worth while, give it offensive quirks, otherwise it will NEVER get used. And likely still wouldn't even with a weapon quirk.
And like I said, if its a set of 8 quirk, then its like the SNV-1 and basically only has arm hardpoints, no highmounted energy or ballistics.
#19
Posted 15 February 2018 - 03:28 PM
worse omnipods need to be incentivized more than better omnipods
making better omnipods better and leaving the worse omnipods worse is not going to fix that problem
omnipods need to be balanced better, and having one omnipod thats outright better than all the others is not balanced.
Quote
most 90+ assaults need agility buffs, not just the atlas.
theres no reason the atlas should be particularly more agile than other 100 tonners though
the atlas isnt known for being agile. its known for having a crapton of armor.
and some of the atlases like the atlas-K could use hardpoint updates. it would be neat if the atlas-K had 1B in each side torso. then there would be a reason to use it.
Edited by Khobai, 15 February 2018 - 03:41 PM.
#20
Posted 15 February 2018 - 03:31 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users