Edited by cmopatrick, 20 September 2012 - 10:56 AM.
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://mwomercs.com/static/img/house/lonewolf.png)
Ohm's Quick Reference Sheets For All Mech Hardpoints, Weapons, Engines, & Pilot Lab - Images, Pdfs, Excel Inside
#301
Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:56 AM
#302
Posted 20 September 2012 - 12:28 PM
Edited by Ohmwrecker, 20 September 2012 - 12:36 PM.
#303
Posted 20 September 2012 - 12:34 PM
#304
Posted 20 September 2012 - 01:06 PM
I must say I have used this since the day you first posted it. Thank you for the hard work and time you have put towards this. Keep up the great work.
#305
Posted 20 September 2012 - 01:25 PM
#306
Posted 20 September 2012 - 02:22 PM
maxrange: 450m
damage: 0
heat: 0
cooldown:0
tons: 0,5
slots: 1
NARC
maxrange: 270m
damage:0
heat: 2
cooldown:3,5
tons: 3
slots: 2
#307
Posted 20 September 2012 - 03:29 PM
Thanks Mate
#308
Posted 20 September 2012 - 04:41 PM
#309
Posted 20 September 2012 - 05:27 PM
#310
Posted 20 September 2012 - 08:49 PM
#311
Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:59 PM
#312
Posted 20 September 2012 - 11:40 PM
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
#313
Posted 21 September 2012 - 12:37 AM
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.png)
#314
Posted 21 September 2012 - 07:02 AM
TrainWreck102, on 20 September 2012 - 05:27 PM, said:
Yeah, I'd like to second this as a suggested change to the sheet. The RVN-4X is the correct designation for the one in the game right now. The RVN-4L is a tabletop 3060s variant with technology taken from Field Manual: Capellan Confederation, set in that era.
/aspienitpickingftw
EDIT: Whoops, somehow missed Ohm's acknowledgement of the change. Well, at least my post was somewhat informative?
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.png)
Edited by Youngblood, 21 September 2012 - 07:20 AM.
#315
Posted 21 September 2012 - 11:59 AM
Definitely bookmarking this treasure of a post.
and..
Youngblood, on 21 September 2012 - 07:02 AM, said:
/aspienitpickingftw
EDIT: Whoops, somehow missed Ohm's acknowledgement of the change. Well, at least my post was somewhat informative?
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.png)
Do you think a request to change a single letter mistake in these fantastic charts really needs repeated "seconding" when it's already been mentioned?
this guy did alot of work getting this stuff together, try to control your OCD everyone :-/
#316
Posted 21 September 2012 - 05:47 PM
Are these numbers perfectly accurate? Or just rough estimates? And if they are accurate, then were the patch notes a lie?
#317
Posted 21 September 2012 - 07:26 PM
NessOnett, on 21 September 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:
Are these numbers perfectly accurate? Or just rough estimates? And if they are accurate, then were the patch notes a lie?
I hope the patch notes weren't a false accusation
#318
Posted 21 September 2012 - 11:21 PM
#319
Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:53 AM
Thanks for a very useful thread!
#320
Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:58 AM
11 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users