Marauders, Who Really Likes Them?
#21
Posted 15 January 2019 - 12:59 PM
I don't know how some of you may judge the Marauder II as undergunned whatever when it hasn't even come out, it's quirks haven't been revealed or anything other than the most basic of stats.
I don't care if it ends up being the worst mech, I can't wait for that head cannon and all the armored glory that its design is.
You all negative nancies can go get LRMed for a few days for all your negativity.
<3 Marauders
#22
Posted 15 January 2019 - 02:17 PM
if the MarF (for fattie) is gonna be like it's smaller cousin, I'm a happy camper.
goes without saying that it a) doesn't bring anything new to the 100t range (yet, maybe mobility), b.) is probably undergunned c) is no Crusader or UrbieIIC ..
but they could have done a lot worse.
#23
Posted 15 January 2019 - 03:48 PM
Edited by - World Eater -, 15 January 2019 - 03:48 PM.
#24
Posted 15 January 2019 - 04:18 PM
#27
Posted 15 January 2019 - 06:08 PM
FLG 01, on 15 January 2019 - 05:55 PM, said:
To be honest, if I wasn't specifically told that the Nightstar was supposed to be patterned after the Marauder, it would take me a hefty amount of booze to even begin to see a resemblance. It doesn't help that the original design looks abysmal to boot.
#28
Posted 15 January 2019 - 06:09 PM
Reposter, on 15 January 2019 - 07:25 AM, said:
I personally don't like the fact that they are adding another Marauder but whatever. Yes PGI has come to an Agreement with Harmony Gold and can do whatever they want pretty much now.
#29
Posted 15 January 2019 - 06:49 PM
#30
Posted 15 January 2019 - 06:58 PM
I have no excitement for the Marauder II being included in the game at all. The King Crab will continue to do a better job while looking far more fearsome in doing it. If I had been given a choice in the matter at all, I wish PGI had taken a page from the Riot Games playbook and gave the NIghtstar a much needed makeover. THAT is the intended 'next generation' IS Marauder chassis, and it got so screwed in terms of just about everything.
#31
Posted 15 January 2019 - 07:12 PM
They are so versatile in their builds and they have some durability and a nice narrow front profile that lets you spread damage like a boss, or dead side tank
Good with all kinds of ACs, PPCs, RACs, MRMs, Lasers...
MAD-BH2 and MAD-3R are the stand outs for me
I am looking forward to the Marauder II because I love 100 ton IS mechs. Looks okay, even if I think the wings are a bit funky
#32
Posted 15 January 2019 - 07:13 PM
#33
Posted 15 January 2019 - 08:18 PM
I gotta say, in MWO there are some really good Marauder and mechs related to them. That MAD-3R is one tanky little 75-tonner, and just the variants we have to work with in that group are interesting, fun, and varied. I can see why PGI would want to introduce another mech in the Marauder family tree.
#34
Posted 15 January 2019 - 09:29 PM
#35
Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:00 PM
Kodyn, on 15 January 2019 - 09:29 PM, said:
Kodyn can you play some Quick Play so i can shoot at you again... I miss those days of shooting at you, missing, and you shooting me back in the face
#36
Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:31 PM
Reposter, on 15 January 2019 - 07:15 AM, said:
Who voted or asked for the 100 ton Marauder 2?
Anyone hate Marauders?
I personally think the Heavy Marauder and Marauder IIC was enough, did not really asking for another version of the Marauder... so why is it being Launched?
I love the fact that so many of them are coming out after HG's epic "near" court loss (they settled out of court before the judge could stomp a mud hole in 'em).
#37
Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:47 PM
#38
Posted 15 January 2019 - 11:26 PM
But I pilot the madiic a lot. Combined number of matches across the variants, it is the mech I pilot the most.
Though I don't see the appeal of the 100 tonne IS mad 2, its free for the pre order of mw5, which I'm getting anyways. So it's good
#39
Posted 16 January 2019 - 12:55 AM
If lots of players asked for Marauder II , then PGI made the right call .
Edited by Pain G0D, 16 January 2019 - 01:02 AM.
#40
Posted 16 January 2019 - 01:54 AM
Marauders and warhammers are still one of strongest heavy chassis, if we consider their low defensive quirks compered to others IS heavies. Nightstar was an evolution of Marauder chassis, in original art it was sleek and low mech, MWO model of it is one of few complete misses and it suffers for it (even engine rating is of, since there ware version which had 64 speed in lore). It has more of wedge design look, while Marauder II sits more on Marauder shape, which leaves me hoping for a narrower profile, still dont know how top gun would be implemented.... but there was an idea, that top mount could be articulated/synch with arms, that would be something.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users