cazeral, on 17 December 2021 - 08:41 AM, said:
My friend once commented on it being nice to have something new; his Mrs found out and now he lives alone and without a huge chunk of his monthly salary, new does not always mean better! This map adds to the continuing run of mistresses that do little than bolster the ego of PGI, but cost (in population/popularity) heavily on the retention of players and engagement of long existing people when they are simply thrown out without proper testing or market research.
Seriously? You're comparing a new map to a philanderer?
cazeral, on 17 December 2021 - 08:45 AM, said:
I would suggest the new Polar map has become one of the "least" unfavourable map updates, rather than it become a defined preference.
Still lots of things to fix on it including floating rocks, snow caps to buildings, trap points and other misplaced assets. Maybe if the quality of the maps were better, there would be a greater acceptance of them. PTS is being ignored and that will always be a failing in any product roll out, as is ignoring feedback.
They have 1 map guy. They have basically no development resources for this game.
It's a miracle we get anything at all. Clutching your pearls about market research just tells me you aren't really aware of what's been going on for the last two years.