No one claimed that you said those legitimate builds were illegal. That is a lie. In the world of honest people, you've said many things like:
MrMadguy, on 27 December 2024 - 01:38 PM, said:
We shouldn't discuss each and every case of abusing/exploiting something, that leads to one single player outplaying 23 others. What we discuss here - is that it shouldn't happen in Tier 3/4. Matchmaking should protect us from such abuse. [emphasis added]
So, you claimed that the matchmaker is "not protecting you" from the "abuse" of people using good builds, and using tactics you dislike - and that one player using these "abusive" tactics can outperform the rest of both teams combined. You can try to pawn off the first lie as just your opinion, but the second is an obvious falsehood that just... boggles the mind. You are literally making up or repeating a lie in every post now.
And then there's
this whopper:
MrMadguy, on 27 December 2024 - 11:51 PM, said:
Situation is actually even worse. Majority is sacrificed to satisfy minority. Once game has already flopped - it's pro players, who don't have enough opponents to play with. And, you know what? It's their problem. Wanna play in amateur league? It's you, who should learn to be amateur. Not me, who should learn to be pro. Forget about your pro tactics. And till then you should sit in 30min queues.
You're lazy. And because you are also spoiled, you feel entitled to your laziness because you believe that you (and
only you) have the right to succeed at a complicated game without spending any effort. But you're also dishonest, and not smart enough to conceal it - because that up there? That tipped your hand. You
know why the matchmaker is set up the way it is; you
know that it's the best compromise available between skill separation and matchmaking - given that people want to play with their friends. Barring groups actually
would damage the game and drive people away, but you don't care about that - you just want easy matches so that you can feel skilled without being skilled.
You're trying to manufacture moral high ground by claiming that the
matchmaker (which would work fine with more players, even by your self-serving standards) is "why online games flop," but that's just another lie. You made that up to justify your sense of entitlement, but you've been told in this very thread that many online games have a similar matchmaker (or no skill-based matchmaking at all) and are still doing fine. The real reason MWO has declined (not flopped) is that Faction Warfare wasn't engaging enough to serve its intended role as a progression endgame - but don't let facts distract you from your self-absorbed claims of victimhood!
It takes a
Very Special kind of mind to suggest that punishing players for being better than you
choose to be is a viable solution to anything. It's just the rationalization of a spoiled, coddled child: "Those people who learned to play instead of throwing forum tantrums should have to wait a half an hour per match! Yeah! They should learn to be crappy players like me - punishing people for getting better as they play couldn't have
any negative consequences!" You honestly just flat-out claimed that because you are lazy and don't want to play better, other players should be punished with half-hour wait times for getting into Tier 1. No game would survive implementing your suggestion that the top players be punished in this way.
Good news! There
is an Amateur League! It's called Tier5! It's you who should learn to be amateur - until then, you should sit in matches with your betters and be farmed like you deserve. The matchmaker is working as it should - and as intended.
3
