dal10, on 17 April 2013 - 12:09 PM, said:
your hundreds of megajoules is complete BS. using the medium rifle comparison that exists in era report 1945, the total wattage to deal 1 point of armor damage is 859k watts. a large laser would require 8 times that or 7.16 million watts. still, a capacitor would not work to power a unit for a long period of time anyway as it is a short term storage solution. it discharges and charges far too quickly for any long term use. so you sir, do not know what you are talking about in that regard.
anyway, as to the damage regards from normal infantry, that is using the modern day knowledge that you can generally one shot most things. an abram can be one shotted by an an rpg. however, would that rpg be considered to be as useful if it took 30-40 to drop the abrams (not counting reactive armor or the like)? Take away the one shot capability, and battlemechs are more useful (though i do admit tanks would be better, the atlas in particular would be useless in any real battlefield, but that is neither here or there). the idea behind a scout battlemech would be far more reasonable however.
Not quite, think about it... if a scout mech on a chassis that is one of the most grossly inefficient platform by carry weight can support enough armor to sustain multiple direct hits from anti vehicle weapons that a power armor can carry then one has to ask... what happens if everyone else carries this same armor in a more efficient platform? And for that matter, what on earth is the weapon's material made of that armor thin enough for the scout mech to carry can withstand multiple hits of the weapon?
And with regard to capacitor, you missed the point
Incidentally, the multi hundred MJ value? really easy to deduce... BT made the mistake of publishing information like Gauss rifle's stats etc which can be easily checked and from there we can deduce how much energy it output roughly
hint: we know the gauss rifle slug weight in BT, we know how fast it flies at muzzle velocity
This all incidentally have been done in this very thread in the past... but just as a rough recap using rough values:
gauss rifle have 8 shots per ton of ammunition so that gives us around 125kg per slug, let's be generous and assume that the ammunition containers, link, etc and what not (they never bothered to elaborate here since they probably realize it would be NONSENSE based on how battlemechs are designed if they mention about it) weigh some 250kg say... that gives us around 94kg per slug on a ton of gauss rifle ammunition
this slug gets accelerated to mach 6, giving it at low end estimate 188MJ of kinetic energy
if the slug weighs 125kg, it has a low end estimate of 250MJ of kinetic energy
Just wanna play, on 17 April 2013 - 05:16 PM, said:
also to the guy saying capacitors logical fail blah blah blah, first, the gauss rifle already exists, second, just stop talking
most people don't seem to realize just how hard it is to dmg an abrams tank, the tracks and such are fairly easy to dmg, its just magnesium alloy, but that classified chobham/uranium/god knows what shell around the important stuff is, well, you get the idea
Failure on comprehension
read the statement again,
what i stated is that if BT has all the energy weapons it has... it MUST have working capacitors capable of powering the system
if so, it KNOWS how to make a energy storage device sufficient to power the power armor when considering the size of the weapons, and the energy these weapons output, and given the involved miniaturization on them, it obviously has reached the point where it has enough energy storage density to store enough power for a power armor.
this is all in context with BT supposed level of tech
in short: based on what BT has, they most definitely have energy storage sufficient for power armor energy consumption, doubly so considering BT have a strange material weight and density and the ludicrous amount of energy they regularly handle.
incidentally, no one in the right mind uses high magnesium content for military vehicle parts likely to be exposed to hostile fire... for obvious reason... for a ground combat vehicle like a tank that is expected to receive heavy incoming fire on an exposed part to use high magnesium content alloy on such part... that takes guts...or plain suicidal mindset.
Edited by Melcyna, 18 April 2013 - 03:10 AM.