data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24934/249342f680de9f75d70ff7d36bca60e85e8dd7ce" alt="Posted Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8699/c8699cb478b143dee6ca2f6e447e9d81d7bfa4b1" alt=""
Atlai Or Atlases? Vote Now!
#181
Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:58 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24934/249342f680de9f75d70ff7d36bca60e85e8dd7ce" alt="Posted Image"
#182
Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:08 PM
#184
Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:14 PM
#186
Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:19 PM
#187
Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:20 PM
#188
Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:24 PM
#189
Posted 02 August 2012 - 12:28 PM
Octopi... Atlasi.
#192
Posted 02 August 2012 - 01:22 PM
<puts on his tinfoil hat and climbs in the fall-out bunker>
#193
Posted 02 August 2012 - 01:25 PM
Morashtak, on 02 August 2012 - 01:22 PM, said:
<puts on his tinfoil hat and climbs in the fall-out bunker>
I will haft to look into this!
indeed something dose not seem right here, i fear Atlases has thrown the poll!
#194
Posted 02 August 2012 - 02:04 PM
Incunabulum, on 02 August 2012 - 05:51 AM, said:
All right Mr. Smartypants - what's the root of atlas?
Funny you should ask. The original form of the word turned up as Atlai (see the writings of Insanicus, 400BC), which was already a plural. The debate to what the singular should be was quite pronounced, though eventually they decided on Atlas, with the retroactively assigned root of "Steiner". Needless to say, this stuck.
#195
Posted 02 August 2012 - 02:05 PM
Suskis, on 02 August 2012 - 09:21 AM, said:
Atlas
Atlantis
Atlanti
Atlantem, Atlanta
Atla
Atlante
and IT HAS NO PLURAL. guess why? it's a GOD and there is only one of them
It's not, it's perfectly good (ancient) Greek and I can assure you, it pluralizes just fine, like all nouns do in both Latin and Greek. Rarely does context call for it but I gave a simplistic example of English doing just that: "I saw the two Jennifers, yesterday". So, no.
#196
Posted 02 August 2012 - 02:11 PM
SakuranoSenshi, on 02 August 2012 - 02:05 PM, said:
It's not, it's perfectly good (ancient) Greek and I can assure you, it pluralizes just fine, like all nouns do in both Latin and Greek. Rarely does context call for it but I gave a simplistic example of English doing just that: "I saw the two Jennifers, yesterday". So, no.
That's the second time I've seen that example from you =P You're such a stalwart!
#197
Posted 02 August 2012 - 02:12 PM
Because Atlases.
#200
Posted 02 August 2012 - 02:29 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users