Why developers continue to demonize Capellan Confederation?
#201
Posted 20 May 2012 - 07:50 AM
If you were the smallest guy in a Battle Royale, and you've already been beaten down more times than you can count, don't you think some crazy might come in handy?
You can be the sane good guy if you want, but i'm gonna finish my fights by spittin out ears and curbstompin Victors.
#202
Posted 20 May 2012 - 02:48 PM
#203
Posted 21 May 2012 - 01:33 AM
#204
Posted 22 May 2012 - 11:47 AM
First notable (for me) fact is her portrait by Katharine Carl, that's exactly how I've imagined Romano Liao:
Second fact, more relevant to our conversation, is:
"The traditional view of the Empress Dowager Cixi was that of a devious despot who contributed in no small part to China's slide into corruption, anarchy, and revolution." But that view opposes opinions of people knew Empress personally, just check the Historical opinions paragraph if you are interested. Speaking about her ruthless fighting for power, you should always keep in mind historical background: environment, culture, traditions, what was going in the Europe (speaking not about Americas) at that period and what is most important: who is declaring "traditional" view!
P.S. Yeah, I also don't believe Wikipedia completely, but the article has links to external documents and books.
#205
Posted 22 May 2012 - 12:29 PM
#206
Posted 22 May 2012 - 01:45 PM
#207
Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:06 PM
#208
Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:15 PM
#209
Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:21 PM
Beazle, on 20 May 2012 - 07:50 AM, said:
If you were the smallest guy in a Battle Royale, and you've already been beaten down more times than you can count, don't you think some crazy might come in handy?
You can be the sane good guy if you want, but i'm gonna finish my fights by spittin out ears and curbstompin Victors.
The problem is the Romano wasn't the good kind of crazy, but the "literally a schizophrenic" kind of crazy. Typically, they are the least dangerous people and delusions of, say, being a Goddess and such are met with people being ignored on the street.
However, she happens to be royal so she has legions of people agreeing with her. This lead her to murder who own people and freak military officers out so bad that "throwing yourself suicidally into the enemy" became the far preferable option to even regrouping for a defensive.
So yeah, she was crazy dangerous but mostly to her own people. It's like if you took Kim Jong with a dash of Stalin then gave them a mental illness that made them buy into their own propaganda and literally believe they were supernatural, then threw in a military that couldn't just be rolled over in a night when they do something terrible.
Edited by Victor Morson, 23 May 2012 - 03:21 PM.
#210
Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:21 PM
Edited by daneiel varna, 23 May 2012 - 03:24 PM.
#211
Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:22 PM
But yeah, read some of the books and she was depicted as pretty well barking.
Ratzap
#212
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:45 PM
NARCoMAN, on 23 May 2012 - 03:15 PM, said:
Very intelligent, it's especially clearly seen from your post.
Edited by IxxxI, 23 May 2012 - 10:36 PM.
#213
Posted 23 May 2012 - 11:01 PM
We are capellans... we don't bark, we bite. And if in any way possible, we bite were it hurts the most.
If he believes otherwise, he will have to learn the hard and painfull way.
#214
Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:18 AM
#215
Posted 24 May 2012 - 01:29 AM
She is clearly bat sh*t!
Some more pro-CC stuff would be nice though.
#216
Posted 25 May 2012 - 12:03 PM
#217
Posted 26 May 2012 - 06:50 PM
Alaskan Viking, on 23 May 2012 - 03:06 PM, said:
MMmmmmm Not communist. Putting the state first is different. There is still a market system in place. Tax rates may be high, but that's because the CC is outnumbered, so everybody has to contribute that much more in order to stay competitive.
I can't speak for the entire CC, but i'm an evil scum bag. I'm pretty good at it though, and i'm no commie.
#218
Posted 26 May 2012 - 08:40 PM
#219
Posted 27 May 2012 - 01:22 AM
Stone Profit, on 26 May 2012 - 08:40 PM, said:
Not so much fear for the House Leader, but more for the tyranic rule of those leaders representing the superior forces.
#220
Posted 27 May 2012 - 07:47 AM
Thorn Hallis, on 27 May 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:
Not so much fear for the House Leader, but more for the tyranic rule of those leaders representing the superior forces.
there are multiple times in the novels where the Liao commanders said they would rather die in battle rather than face Romano Liaos punishment for failure, as dying in battle would be much less painful.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
















