Unseen/reseen: Aye Or Nay?
#241
Posted 24 January 2013 - 11:32 AM
#244
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:27 PM
"OMG! I would pay double MC to pay for a Phoenix Hawk or a Maruder..."
You do realize that PGI or IGP wouldn't see a DIME of that extra money you are spending on for the older UNSEEN designs? All of that money you would be paying extra for would all go to Harmony Gold. How in your right minds could you advocate giving money to the company that nearly destroyed the Battletech/Mechwarrior franchise and put FASA out of business? HOW?
I met Jordan Weisman and a couple of the guys in FASA as their offices were in Chicago, and I live nearby. When I heard they were going out of business, I drove there to their offices to get the official word. They were closing up shop. People who were working there were crying because they had lost their jobs. It was sickening to see that. And I wanted to become a game designer/writer for FASA.
Harmony Gold can bite my @$$. There is no way I want them to make a stinkin' dime off of this. I hope they never make a deal like this. NEVER. Let them redo the art from the Reseens if they want to or design NEW ART for the Unseens that are nothing like the originals so they can't be sued. And personally I would love to hear the DEV's legal team reply on this so this issue can be put to bed forever.
NOW...the ONLY way I would be ok with the Unseens coming back is if Harmony Gold goes bankrupt and PGI or whomever is running the works and upholding the Battletech/Mechwarrior franchise and buys back the rights for pennies on the dollar of what they are actually worth, and then the rights are given to PGI so they can then use the Unseens. THAT is the only way I would be ok with the Unseens coming back here.
Let Harmony Gold choke on their own greed and die off. SLOWLY.
P.S. - I changed my vote for entirely new art from PGI.
Edited by Tice Daurus, 24 January 2013 - 01:30 PM.
#245
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:27 PM
#246
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:28 PM
I just care with more Mechs, more Dakkas, more stuff.
#247
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:31 PM
SociopathicSquirrel, on 24 January 2013 - 01:28 PM, said:
I just care with more Mechs, more Dakkas, more stuff.
Ummm, if they could decide this issue and announce it, PGI could have well over 12+ new mechs with new designs. More mechs, more dakka.
#248
Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:13 PM
Now if by some small miracle PGI decides to tackle these beasts, I would really prefer them to be based off the originals. I am not a fan of the "Re-seen" designs. I love what PGI has done with our existing stable of 'Mechs and I think they could come up with appropriate designs.
I would rather have PGI redesign the unseen from the ground up than have to pay Harmony Gold a single cent for licensing. (wow, it actually kinda hurt to say that, but it's true)
Edited by Pendraco, 24 January 2013 - 02:25 PM.
#249
Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:53 PM
I have no doubt they would be implemented immediately if it were legally possible. The so-called "reseen" is better than nothing.
(also, all the Macross versions look stupid and cartoony, and I have always hated them...it annoys me to no end that they control the rights to these designs)
Edited by Sadistic Savior, 24 January 2013 - 02:54 PM.
#250
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:19 PM
#251
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:50 PM
#252
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:00 PM
Pendraco, on 24 January 2013 - 02:13 PM, said:
I guess I just never understood why the battlemaster had a hand to hold its giant gun... and the wolverine... whats with the briefcase? You aren't allowed to bring that gun to the 'mech office ya know...
at any rate I'm all for redesigns. They have done a great job so far. Some of the mechs that looked lame in the original art look pretty cool now. My limited understanding of IP laws is that the work needs to be different by about 20% to avoid infringement, It seems like they should be able to capture the themes of those mechs well while steering clear of legal trouble.
#253
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:12 PM
#254
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:21 PM
#255
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:24 PM
#256
Posted 24 January 2013 - 08:18 PM
Stone
Rhino
#257
Posted 24 January 2013 - 08:49 PM
BadgerWI, on 24 January 2013 - 07:24 PM, said:
Actually, in this case, it's Mom fighting the guy in the van, who insists that he has a paper saying that he gets to decide who plays with the toys, even though they really belong to a Japanese mechanic.
#258
Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:44 PM
#259
Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:54 PM
Dran, on 24 January 2013 - 07:12 PM, said:
like this?
#260
Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:56 PM
13 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 13 guests, 0 anonymous users