#161
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:23 PM
#162
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:23 PM
Edited by Fluffinator, 20 February 2012 - 10:24 PM.
#163
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:25 PM
#164
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:33 PM
#165
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:37 PM
#166
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:43 PM
Drazek Red Beard, on 20 February 2012 - 09:52 PM, said:
Micro$ofted!
They couldn't get the MW:4 Series properly, so they went and nagged some consoleros with their MA series.
Now with MW:O coming up M$ seems to hope they'll get a piece of the action throwing NagAssault 3 on the market.
Lima Zulu, on 20 February 2012 - 10:33 PM, said:
They wouldn't dare this! They'd never be able to move out on the streets without helmet and kevlar vest!
On the other hand, the'd never ever be in the danger of starvation with all that vegetables the'd receive. Even if that would be a little old.
Edited by Arnold Carns, 20 February 2012 - 10:49 PM.
#167
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:10 PM
#168
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:12 PM
#169
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:13 PM
#170
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:24 PM
#171
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:28 PM
#172
Posted 21 February 2012 - 12:17 AM
djuice1701, on 20 February 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:
Not something I would like since the game doesn't seem to have any tactics/strategy to it. Also face pace with mechs usually doesn't go well.
I know a game with fast pace, twitch skills and a lot of teamwork and tactics involved. It is called Starsiege:Tribes (yeah a mech universe, but no mech involved) and Tribes 2.
Fluffinator, on 20 February 2012 - 10:23 PM, said:
Good for you. Didn't you get a spare beta-key?
#173
Posted 21 February 2012 - 12:29 AM
#174
Posted 21 February 2012 - 01:30 AM
#175
Posted 21 February 2012 - 01:40 AM
Marvin Martian, on 20 February 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:
You may want to check the tags on the Youtube video again. Even IGN seems to think it doesn't have a platform announced when one of the tags is clearly "PC game"
Still, could be interesting, I'll probably give it a shot. Consider it a backup if MWO turns out to not be to my liking.
#177
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:16 AM
And of course, they shut up quite nicely now. lol not really a bright idea to insult the Mechsim gamers, isn't it?
Anyway, game doesn't really look too shabby but it doesn't really hold much of a candle against Hawken, which is a more closer competitor to it. Cartoonish artsyle is nothing wrong but I'm not sure if it meshes well with giant stomping robots. Battlemechs are supposed to make people believe they are THAT 50 tons of metal and destruction but cartoonish graphics do not portray that aspects. So the mechs in this game look like plastic toys.
Plus the video shows too much of AE damage cluster**** so I'm not sure what are they trying to impress on potential players. That DIDN'T look fun at all.
But well, can never have too much of mech games so this is a good trend.
Edited by rollermint, 21 February 2012 - 02:18 AM.
#178
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:23 AM
Mattiator, on 21 February 2012 - 01:40 AM, said:
Its a F2P game. While still not 100% confirmed, F2P and PC are basically, to quote RockPaperShotgun.com, like dogs and lamp posts .
#179
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:37 AM
Anyone catch the release date?
#180
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:43 AM
that being said, the game itself doesn't look that good to me. the movement animations were clipped, the weapon effects were frequently over the top, and i thought i saw a few 'flying' mechs (gundam style).... not on my list of likes. As far as the speed of the game goes..... holy sh!tballs...... they could make a side game in there just for drag racing those mechs.
Edited by HATER-1, 21 February 2012 - 02:46 AM.
13 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 13 guests, 0 anonymous users