

#2441
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM
#2442
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM
Hawks, on 04 March 2013 - 05:47 PM, said:
You mean you want to learn about something you don't buy every book you can find on the subject, tear all the pages out, shuffle them together randomly and then read it? What are you like?!?
I dunno what I was thinking. Clearly this now-117-pages thread on several disparate subjects is the easiest way to gather all opinions.
Hell, why don't we just merge all threads? It's best to gather all information in one thread, or so I'm told.
#2443
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM
#2444
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM
#2446
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM
In any case: coolant flushing is stupid in the first place. Second, who cares. It's a one shot deal that probably will have very little impact on a drop. They'll only be used in competitive matches because there's no real outcome to pug matches until CW, which is months and months away. Even then, who cares? A Mech gets a one time heat scale reduction. Whatever. Good pilots can manage their heat without the coolant flushing.
#2447
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:50 PM
#2449
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
#2450
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
#2451
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
#2452
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
MischiefSC, on 04 March 2013 - 05:49 PM, said:
There's always instant action mode in MW3 and MW4.

#2453
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
MoonUnitBeta, on 04 March 2013 - 05:42 PM, said:
and
"ONE TIME USE PER GAME"
and
"MUST BE REPURCHASED"
and
"CAN ONLY EQUIP CB COOLANT FLUSH, OR MC. NOT BOTH AT THE SAME TIME"
For sure it has to be repurchased for every match?
lol, if so, I could give a flying frak about any of it then. i was hoping by "consumable" they meant you bought the coolant flush module, once, and then it was "consumable" like ammunition in game. If I have to buy it all the time, pfft, forget it. I got mechs to buy. And guns and lasers and cool ****, cooler **** then antifreeze.
#2454
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
#2455
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
RedDragon, on 04 March 2013 - 05:44 PM, said:
Just to keep the guys in here informed: Results as of 5 pm PST before the topics were merged and my poll deleted: 400 votes, 75% against coolant flush, 25% for coolant flush.
Edit: @Niko: If you were interested in user opinions, you wouldn't have deleted the poll that gave you empirical evidence that 3/4 of your customers don't like coolant flush.
#2456
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
BladeSplint, on 04 March 2013 - 05:49 PM, said:
I disagree. It's got to be hard for the developers to ignore a 500 page thread full of rage. I bet we can have that by Friday.
#2457
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
#2458
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
http://mwomercs.com/...my-thread-mods/
have fun, its probably at about 2500 comments by now
#2459
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
Niko Snow, on 04 March 2013 - 05:43 PM, said:
Im gonna have to call bull on this one.... The opinion was pretty clear.
P2W=BAD
MWO=P2W
So people were basically telling you how much of their money your never going to see if you follow through on this.
My Advice?
Just make the modules the same, let people by tier 3 with CBills, and let people buy tier 1 and 2 with MC...
and punch whoever thought this crap was a good idea in the nuts a few times to make sure they never do it again... Its almost as stupid as the whole ECM fiasco....
If the same guy who devised the ECM implementation also came up with this, kick his can to the curb and find a replacement.
MAD?
YOU WANT TO SEE MAD?
I HAVE NOT YET BEGUN TO MAD!
eNGAGE fACETYPE Mode!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
as;ljh pqawgsj ;blawd gajfd ghkf;jgh;asg alf'lA J'KLJFKJASDK ;ASKDFL;K SHGKNFL;AKENF;JSDJARGK
HADSJGH LAKJGALKGH AJHG LHLKLphlllllllllbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb!,masd fkdf; jak;j fg;ilu pawt;' kjapsk f;ajg sdtk0yj ikajf ;ad
GABBA GABBA HEY OJH LOOK A BUNNY RABBIT I WONDER WHERE ITS OH SWEET JESUS NO! NOT MECH ROMNEY! HES CONSUMING ALL THE FLLAFELS!, but I Digress PLANETOIDS!
My sister was bitten by a camel once.....
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users