75 replies to this topic

[Thorn Hallis]

It's either sarcasm or they forgot to add the word "valid".

[Windies]

Zero Neutral, on 08 December 2012 - 02:02 PM, said:

Hm, well, you read my statement, then you tell me where u went wrong by re-wording my statement. Let's not derail the topic, though...

"Everyone loves ECM" = not true
"Everyone hates ECM" = not true...
"Some people like and some people don't like ECM" = true but who the heck would write such a dumb statement...?

If every one always wrote the truth about other's opinions, then they would all read like, "This is a pretty cool but not so cool feature depending on who you ask. Some people like it and some people don't. Free will prevails..." Not very exciting.

Now back on topic.

I didn't re-word your statement. You're talking in absolute's, as in everyone either loves it or everyone hates it. Either way, who really cares.

[Zero Neutral]

Windies, on 08 December 2012 - 02:07 PM, said:

I didn't re-word your statement. You're talking in absolute's, as in everyone either loves it or everyone hates it. Either way, who really cares.

If they said that every one hates ECM, they would be lying...

A simple true statement... just stop.

[Windies]

Zero Neutral, on 08 December 2012 - 02:09 PM, said:

If they said that every one hates ECM, they would be lying...

A simple true statement... just stop.

Apparently you don't understand what an absolute is.

[CompositeGNFNR]

My only issue with ECM is the Null-sig armor aspects. They should remove the no-lock on aspect, and the no targeting feature, also streaks should be able to fire without a lock ONLY when the mech targeting computer detects a ECM.

[Zero Neutral]

Windies, on 08 December 2012 - 02:11 PM, said:

Apparently you don't understand what an absolute is.

Back on topic pls.

CompositeGNFNR, on 08 December 2012 - 02:12 PM, said:

My only issue with ECM is the Null-sig armor aspects. They should remove the no-lock on aspect, and the no targeting feature, also streaks should be able to fire without a lock ONLY when the mech targeting computer detects a ECM.

I disagree with what you said, but if they made it that you can target an enemy mech, but not lock-on, while under the effects of ECM, then I guess your suggestion would make more sense. If people could fire SSRM without a lock, that would be dumb.

[Redshift2k5]

ABSOLUTELY NO COMPLAINTS wink wink

The patch notes themselves contain similar tongue in cheek delivery http://mwomercs.com/game/patch-notes

I am going to be honest with you ECM is a game changer so let us know how you feel about ECM on the forums because lately I think you guys have been holding back and not telling us how you really feel.

[TruePoindexter]

CompositeGNFNR, on 08 December 2012 - 02:12 PM, said:

My only issue with ECM is the Null-sig armor aspects. They should remove the no-lock on aspect, and the no targeting feature, also streaks should be able to fire without a lock ONLY when the mech targeting computer detects a ECM.

Did you just read the title and not the thread?

[MrPenguin]

Thorn Hallis, on 08 December 2012 - 02:06 PM, said:

It's either sarcasm or they forgot to add the word "valid".

That was my exact thoughts. Is it too much of a stretch to say its both?

TruePoindexter, on 08 December 2012 - 02:14 PM, said:

Did you just read the title and not the thread?

That seems to be what most people do.

[Tickdoff Tank]

Particle Man, on 08 December 2012 - 01:49 PM, said:

WHAT?!?! people in THIS forum complaining about anything and everything ever regardless of what it does or doesnt do?

I have said it before, but it bears repeating:

If MWO caused 10 $20.00 bills to shoot out of your computer after each match, some people would complain the the serial numbers were not in sequential order.

[MrPenguin]

Tickdoff Tank, on 08 December 2012 - 02:20 PM, said:

I have said it before, but it bears repeating:

If MWO caused 10 $20.00 bills to shoot out of your computer after each match, some people would complain the the serial numbers were not in sequential order.

And then claim that the human civilization is at risk of dying due to it...

...And then we send Bruce Willis to save the day

Edited by MrPenguin, 08 December 2012 - 02:23 PM.

[Secundus]

PGI didn't take any of the closed beta complaints seriously so I don't see why they would start now.

[Elkarlo]

No Complaint's?
Sorry i posted several times (With Dev Recognition) and made a Support entry that ECM breaks the Ping.
And that was on the Day they introduced the Lagshield Module.

Today i suggest how to fix the Lag Problems

http://mwomercs.com/...ork-ecm-module/

Edited by Elkarlo, 08 December 2012 - 02:31 PM.

[random51]

Secundus, on 08 December 2012 - 02:27 PM, said:

PGI didn't take any of the closed beta complaints seriously so I don't see why they would start now.

Judging by the responses in this thread I can't blame them. Too much effort to sift through tons of stupid for grams of smart.

[MrPenguin]

Secundus, on 08 December 2012 - 02:27 PM, said:

PGI didn't take any of the closed beta complaints seriously so I don't see why they would start now.

Elkarlo, on 08 December 2012 - 02:30 PM, said:

No Complaint's?
Sorry i posted several times (With Dev Recognition) and made a Support entry that ECM breaks the Ping.
And that was on the Day they introduced the Lagshield Module.

http://mwomercs.com/...ork-ecm-module/

Okay, I made this is as simple as possible so you guys could understand.

[Kobold]

Why does the X-axis go from zero to zero?

[Elkarlo]

Mr. Pinguin
Sorry to say that, but it's no Joke. They putt the before so the Sarcasm ends there.
The Editor may have been in Humorous Mood, but it's an official Announcement and Sarcasm or
Funny comments should be Marked. As he marked it before and then not... it is not Humorous.

And personally i can't take it Humorous as i am no longer able to Play MWO, thanks to the ECM Module.
And thats something an Editor for an official Webside should consider, that lot of people have different points of view and may take something serious when it is not clearly marked.

Btw i would pay a lot for Mech Figures... i already did and have a collection worth around 5k € in
Mech Figures..

Edited by Elkarlo, 08 December 2012 - 02:43 PM.

[DevilJade]

Sarcasm is obviously above the heads of these mouth breathers.

[Thorn Hallis]

Elkarlo, on 08 December 2012 - 02:41 PM, said:

And thats something an Editor for an official Webside should consider, that lot of people have different points of view and may take something serious when it is not clearly marked.

Absolutley. I mean, there are still people out their who didn't get the joke when George W. Bush jr. was made president of the US. Because they were NO FRIGGIN SMILIES in the announcement! And see what happened? The joke ran to death for 8 years! All because someone thought people would get the joke.

[Elkarlo]

@ Deviljade
No it is not, but it needs to be marked in an official Posting. It's not a Forums posting.

My Dear DevilJade as you may reconsider in your endless Wisdom which seems fast then your Typing and your flawless Judgement of every Note and reading, you may consider that some people don't share your endless Wisdom and lowers should be guided by the wise ones to a brighter Future.

I guess i missed the [Sarcasm] [/sarcasm] tags somewhere..

Edited by Elkarlo, 08 December 2012 - 02:51 PM.