Jump to content

3Rd Person Views, Poll Revived


565 replies to this topic

Poll: 3rd person, yes, no, on the fence (1769 member(s) have cast votes)

3rd person Views

  1. This is a BAD idea, as it will break the game, so, NO. (1535 votes [84.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 84.90%

  2. This is a GOOD Idea, let us have our 3rd person views, so YES. (129 votes [7.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.13%

  3. Do not care or as of yet undecided. (144 votes [7.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.96%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#241 MrPlow254

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 83 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationOhio, USA

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:09 AM

One thing good about third person view is it allows for awareness of the battlefield Since we are not there you can't feel like someone is sneaking up on you, or know with high accuracy of what direction the person is coming from. However it should not be something so bland in this game. Which is why I believe they have announced a drown that you shoot out of your mech to view the battlefield.

#242 shotokan5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 550 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Locationvirginia

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:09 AM

You know me well enough that I am a straight shooter. AT THIS TIME THEIR IS NO TRUE ACTIONS TAKEN TOWARD 3RD
PERSON. One comment was make and all hell breaks lose. How about some great things that have been done to improve the game.

We want bigger maps and some whine that it is to big. Gods dart, listen too yourselves.

#243 Jestun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:33 AM

View PostSean von Steinike, on 02 March 2013 - 04:56 AM, said:

Sadly, PGI doesn't seem to care.


Really? Because it has not been added, nor have I seen a statement saying "it will definitely be added".

So... I'd be interested in knowing what you base this claim on. Perhaps you can link me to a statement which confirms that 3rd person will 100% definitely be added?

Edited by Jestun, 02 March 2013 - 05:33 AM.


#244 Exoth3rmic

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 434 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:37 AM

Its a bad idea and entirely frivolous.

#245 Viper69

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,204 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:46 AM

View PostJestun, on 02 March 2013 - 05:33 AM, said:


Really? Because it has not been added, nor have I seen a statement saying "it will definitely be added".

So... I'd be interested in knowing what you base this claim on. Perhaps you can link me to a statement which confirms that 3rd person will 100% definitely be added?


Dont have a link but pgi did say that if they add it that it will be in a way it wont effect those that dont want to use it. The only way that is possible is separate queues and the current game population further dividing queues could be very bad.

#246 Jestun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:48 AM

View PostViper69, on 02 March 2013 - 05:46 AM, said:

Dont have a link but pgi did say that if they add it that it will be in a way it wont effect those that dont want to use it. The only way that is possible is separate queues and the current game population further dividing queues could be very bad.



If.

And if they do add it, I would want it to be in a way that doesn't affect me - and mixing 3rd & 1st person players in the same match would affect me.

Regardless, my point still stands. I have yet to see confirmation that 3rd person will 100% definitely be added.

#247 Terror Teddy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,877 posts
  • LocationSweden

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:50 AM

not again...

#248 Viper69

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,204 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:58 AM

View PostJestun, on 02 March 2013 - 05:48 AM, said:



If.

And if they do add it, I would want it to be in a way that doesn't affect me - and mixing 3rd & 1st person players in the same match would affect me.

Regardless, my point still stands. I have yet to see confirmation that 3rd person will 100% definitely be added.
They also said in their press releases to get funding that 3rd person would never be added to keep the game a simulator. So you can glean whatever from either of those statements and use any size font you want. The fact remains that them thinking about it is a 180 from what they said they would not do. It doesnt really matter because they will do what they want regardless of our input or larger than life text.

Edited by Viper69, 02 March 2013 - 06:52 AM.


#249 Jestun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:14 AM

View PostViper69, on 02 March 2013 - 05:58 AM, said:

Well no **** sherlock we all know what if means. They also said in their press releases to get funding that 3rd person would never be added to keep the game a simulator. So you can glean whatever from either of those statements and use any size font you want. The fact remains that them thinking about it is a 180 from what they said they would not do. It doesnt really matter because they will do what they want regardless of our input or larger than life text.


Technically adding it is the opposite of not adding it.

Thinking about how it would be done if it were done is not.

#250 Viper69

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,204 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:19 AM

Im merly saying what they said is all. Make interpretations as to its meaning and time can be the only thing to say what happens.

#251 Terror Teddy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,877 posts
  • LocationSweden

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:37 AM

Can't we get 4th person view?

Why not innocent bystander view?

#252 Jestun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:40 AM

View PostTerror Teddy, on 02 March 2013 - 06:37 AM, said:

Can't we get 4th person view?

Why not innocent bystander view?


Maybe a camera gun?

Fire it out and when it lands you get a small degree of pitch / twist on it?




Actually... that could be interesting. It could have an interesting affect on ambush strategies, etc.

#253 Viper69

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,204 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:42 AM

Can i get a rear view camera? My neighbors soccer wagon has one.

#254 Relic1701

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,197 posts
  • LocationDying at the end of your cheese build!

Posted 02 March 2013 - 07:08 AM

I only have one word on the subject...

Posted Image

#255 MW Waldorf Statler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,459 posts
  • LocationGermany/Berlin

Posted 02 March 2013 - 07:15 AM

Also in the video we see recon drone support, Is it still planed to implement such drones and if so how would that effect the scout role of LIght pilots?
A: Yes. We have plans to add a UAV. It will complement the scout role.

Fastidious: On NGNG Mechs Devs and Beer #8 Paul mentions replays. Can you provide any more details or vague implementation dates about replays and spectating? Specifically it would be great to be able to spectate before dying (perhaps spectator slots).
A: It’s a reach goal. No firm plans. Better/more camera options for spectacting is a possibility. We’re always sensitive to dead players giving an unfair advantage to those living.

#256 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 04 March 2013 - 10:59 AM

http://nooooooooooooooo.com/

#257 Kyn

    Rookie

  • 3 posts

Posted 07 March 2013 - 04:29 PM

http://alltheragefac.../angry-no-l.png

#258 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:13 PM

bumpola

#259 Sartorial Glint

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 43 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:18 PM

match replay, kill cams and the dead can't talk to the living are all things that need to go in

#260 MacKoga

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 209 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:31 PM

View PostAdrienne Vorton, on 23 January 2013 - 10:31 PM, said:

external spectatormode: yes


This would lead to situations where you have a Spotter and a Gunner.


What could be good, would be a dashboard cockpit item, that would be a 3D hologram of your mech in its current pose. It would be included on all trial mechs, and could be bought with MC for those who want it on their regular mechs. This would help teach new players about what they're doing with their mech, and could show you your own paintjob later, if you wanted it.

View PostSartorial Glint, on 08 March 2013 - 01:18 PM, said:

....the dead can't talk to the living are all things that need to go in


This won't work, because teams can use teamspeak servers. This will happen even if MWO gets built-in VOIP. So us puglife players shouldn't be the only ones penalized by losing the ability to haunt the living.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users