Something New Via Twitter! Artemis Countdown (UPDATED 6/5/12)
#281
Posted 30 May 2012 - 08:58 PM
#282
Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:23 PM
Jason Phoenix, on 30 May 2012 - 07:31 PM, said:
Arent Comstar Religious people ? How about we look at Mathiew 13:37-43 and Psalm 137 quickly ? Artemis also a Godess afterall, right ?
So I either need some
Disclaimer: If I offend any Religious people I appologise...
Edit: Dam formatting...
They where religious, but not Christian. I doubt they'd use text from the Christian Bible. Besides, I'm fairly sure it's just Paul trolling us with his 1337 speak.
Edited by pursang, 30 May 2012 - 09:23 PM.
#283
Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:31 PM
Jason Phoenix, on 30 May 2012 - 07:31 PM, said:
Arent Comstar Religious people ? How about we look at Mathiew 13:37-43 and Psalm 137 quickly ? Artemis also a Godess afterall, right ?
So I either need some
Disclaimer: If I offend any Religious people I appologise...
Edit: Dam formatting...
I came to almost the same conclusion just awhile ago but I'm thinking 137 is in reference to General Order 137 which is about the exodus fleet returning to the innersphere.
#284
Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:37 PM
#285
Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:13 AM
Mechs we seen in videos: Hunchy, Catapult, Atlas, Jenner.
Mechs announced but not seen in game yet: Cicada, Centurion, Dragon (seen only as pics), Cataphract, Awesome, Raven.
What does a good E3 show makes? MECHS moving about in game perhaps?
HELL YEAH!
Anything more than that is a bonus.
#286
Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:31 AM
#287
Posted 31 May 2012 - 12:47 AM
Yup it's underwater powered armor, I knew it.
#288
Posted 31 May 2012 - 04:23 AM
#289
Posted 31 May 2012 - 04:30 AM
WalkingDeathBot, on 31 May 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
Yup it's underwater powered armor, I knew it.
OH SNAP!!!
SideSt3p, on 31 May 2012 - 04:23 AM, said:
hmm same results here?
#290
Posted 31 May 2012 - 04:31 AM
SideSt3p, on 31 May 2012 - 04:23 AM, said:
yep...little late for an april´s joke ain´t it ? ^^
#291
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:02 AM
#293
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:03 AM
A. LRMs will be semi-guided. What the heck does that mean? You will be able to lock on to your target but it doesn't mean the actual missiles will home directly to the target. The chance of missing will still be part of LRM gameplay. Use of the Artemis IV system and subsequent munitions, will narrow the area of damage by focusing the flight paths of the missiles. We're finding that this is a good balance between gameplay and staying true to the BattleTech canon.
I saw this chilling in the FAQ section, don't know if anyone else noticed it and posted it yet. It does mention Artemis though, so different ammunition types confirmed atleast?
#294
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:08 AM
Paladin1, on 30 May 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:
You're looking at the first 100+ ton premium `Mech.
Clearly, that post was from Herb's CATS. They are cruel and mysterious masters.
#295
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:24 AM
#296
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:31 AM
Edited by GargoyleKDR, 31 May 2012 - 07:33 AM.
#297
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:33 AM
#298
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:36 AM
... it might have to be assembled from multiple day's images cut up and spliced together...
Edited by Prosperity Park, 31 May 2012 - 07:37 AM.
#299
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:37 AM
Prosperity Park, on 31 May 2012 - 07:36 AM, said:
... it might have to be assembled from multiple day's images cut up and spliced together...
That would stink..and be a real pain.. so, I nominate... not me
#300
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:43 AM
14 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 14 guests, 0 anonymous users