![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/img/house/merc-corps-clanwolf.jpg)
3Rd Person "soon" According To Mwo Twitter
#781
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:44 AM
Chuck Norris shaved his beard and the whole world became a little less tough, resulting in PGI caving on the 3rd person issue.
#782
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:44 AM
Dakkath, on 21 March 2013 - 07:39 AM, said:
Or if they were to be able to separate it out so people who want to drop 3rd can only go against other people that wanna drop in 3rd.
they said they dont wanna seperate the ques for PUG and premade but they DO wanna do it for this?
#783
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:45 AM
![Posted Image](http://th08.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/f/2011/276/e/a/mech_warrior___dark_woodsman_by_shimmering_sword-d4bqq0z.jpg)
#784
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM
Krzysztof z Bagien, on 21 March 2013 - 07:42 AM, said:
Hmm. I still see no problem with the option being there. Because if most people who want 3rd person only don't play anyway right now, then you aren't dividing something that's not there to begin with.
Again, my opinion is that if the option is there MWO gains more players overall, in theory.
Edited by Dakkath, 21 March 2013 - 07:47 AM.
#785
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM
THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.
#786
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:47 AM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 21 March 2013 - 07:44 AM, said:
they said they dont wanna seperate the ques for PUG and premade but they DO wanna do it for this?
Also this. Why is it okay now to segregate the players when it wasn't before.
Garth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:
THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.
And the Twitter thing? Come now, surely you can explain more.
Edited by Thirdstar, 21 March 2013 - 07:48 AM.
#789
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:48 AM
Dakkath, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:
Hmm. I still see no problem with the option being there. Because if most people who want 3rd person only don't play anyway right now, then you aren't dividing something that's not there to begin with.
Again, my opinion is that if the option is there MWO gains more players overall, in theory.
gains more than losing most of their beta players you mean?
#790
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:49 AM
Garth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:
THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.
I'm happy for the response sir, but that calms me the say way as someone would tell me "I'm not gonna cheat on you soon".
#794
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:50 AM
#796
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:51 AM
Garth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:
THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.
YAAAY!
A spectator view for people NOT playing would be fun though. Like being at a pub and watching the match on the telly.
As long as it does not affect performance for the actual players.
#798
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:52 AM
Don't worry folks! We're not going to make it happen! (yet)
#799
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:52 AM
Quote
#800
Posted 21 March 2013 - 07:52 AM
Garth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:
THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.
THIS IS WHY YOU FAIL lack of faith in the ability of players to accept 3rd person is wanted by many and catering to a few who do not. If they don't want to play 3rd person don't check the box DOH---------->
![Posted Image](http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs49/f/2009/199/9/9/Blood_Asp_Walking_by_Walter_NEST.gif)
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users