TruePoindexter, on 16 April 2013 - 03:16 PM, said:
Of course they feel weaker than before because they are weaker than before. That does not make them useless though. They are very deadly and are completely viable. Just don't expect to rip an enemy's side off in a single shot anymore.
As for not being able to stand up to lasers in a brawl isn't that how it's supposed to be? They offer precision firepower allowing them to focus all of their damage to a single spot. SRMs are spread weapons which while dealing overall greater damage should deal less damage to a single area than a directed weapon.
Also 10 tons is not a big difference. 100 vs 90 tons is still in the assault range.
Finally it's completely valid to discuss other mechs when we're talking about a specific mech because we are in fact talking about mechs in general. We can't in one breath say that the Highlanders are terrible for having torso mounted energy weapons but say that other mechs are fine with them without drawing comparisons and conclusions.
Well since you didn't pick up on it of course I meant they've been made too weak. Actually I wasn't certain about the weight difference and having looked it up it's actually a difference of 15 tons. And no I most certainly disagree a laserstalker should beat a DDC. Sure if i was standing still and firing he could get me with focused damage to the CT, but not when I'm torso twisting and spreading out the damage as best I could with arms and side torsos going first. As the clearly heavier assault with more armor I should in fact win most brawls unless I play really badly. Otherwise what is the point of being heavier and slower if I can't take a beating and dish out better than I get?
And talking about Stalkers when I'm trying to focus on Highlanders and how they compare to each other most certainly doesn't make sense. What you're talking about belongs in a general discussion about assaults. That just isn't what this thread is about.
Edited by armyof1, 16 April 2013 - 03:45 PM.