Jump to content

Hero Jagermech: Firebrand


237 replies to this topic

#181 AlmightyAeng

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,905 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 10:49 AM

View PostArctu, on 04 June 2013 - 10:28 AM, said:

Wonder when the first mechs with Dual AC20 and 6 medium lasers will show up. Of course you need to downsize the engine a bit ... but having a 70 damage alpha is kind of sick ...


Yes, it could be. That said, after it's taken a shot and a half, after traveling at Atlas speed, and overheats, I will look forward to blowing out its side torso. You can get stupid high alphas on other heavies, too, but that doesn't make them viable.

Not saying the FB won't be a beast, I'm sure it will...and if it's stupid OP I hope PGI will address it. In the meantime, I'm gonna have fun with it.

Edited by Ghost Badger, 04 June 2013 - 10:50 AM.


#182 Jolly Llama

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 457 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:22 AM

I love mine. Set it up in standard jagerbomb and got 4 kills in my second match. 260k cbills on a good match like that makes it a cash machine.

#183 Edson Drake

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 254 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:24 AM

It's 666, how come it isn't 6 ballistics, 6 energy and 6 missiles? I don't mind 666 at all but won't this bring unnecessary unpleasant attention to this game? I know in the past this caused ridiculous bans on games in some other countries.

I really hope PGI uses the copyrighted response: "It's not 666 it's 999!"

#184 Jolly Llama

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 457 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:28 AM

I like it. Maybe they should embrace the heat and copyright 666.

#185 Blue Footed Booby

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 393 posts
  • LocationHere?

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:29 AM

View PostEdson Drake, on 04 June 2013 - 11:24 AM, said:

It's 666, how come it isn't 6 ballistics, 6 energy and 6 missiles? I don't mind 666 at all but won't this bring unnecessary unpleasant attention to this game? I know in the past this caused ridiculous bans on games in some other countries.

I really hope PGI uses the copyrighted response: "It's not 666 it's 999!"


Is this a serious post? I can't tell anymore.

#186 Skydrive

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 286 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:37 AM

View PostArctu, on 04 June 2013 - 10:28 AM, said:

Oh, I totally missed the max engine rating of 340. So it's even faster and probably more maneuvrable than the K2 now ... this has to be the good handle PGI has on balancing things. Wonder if Firebrand will have only one more module slots than the K2 like the other Jagermechs or it was decided to double that advantage just for the fun of it.

65 tons can be a lot of firepower and is far from being a disadvantage, its exatly the same as the other Jagermechs or Catapults.

Wonder when the first mechs with Dual AC20 and 6 medium lasers will show up. Of course you need to downsize the engine a bit ... but having a 70 damage alpha is kind of sick ...


Cant be done. You can do 2 AC20s and 4 Med lasers, but the AC20s wont leave any room for any Med lasers in those arms.

#187 Finn McShae

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 475 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:46 AM

Stock loadout makes me happy, this will be nice to grind cbills for my Ori......... crap, I guess Victors?

#188 Edson Drake

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 254 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:55 AM

Quote

Is this a serious post? I can't tell anymore.


Sorry, sarcasm got the best of me. The only serious part is about the 666 controversy.

#189 Arctu

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 58 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:58 PM

View PostSkydrive, on 04 June 2013 - 11:37 AM, said:


Cant be done. You can do 2 AC20s and 4 Med lasers, but the AC20s wont leave any room for any Med lasers in those arms.


I'm really glad you are right about this.

#190 Empyrus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 210 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:29 PM

In case someone is interested, JagerMech III loadout, with tweaks for current tech level. Otherwise accurate to the boardgame version, recommend slight tweaks if you're going to use this (move ammo, tweak armor).
JagerMech III

Edited by Empyrus, 04 June 2013 - 01:30 PM.


#191 Raso

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sickle
  • The Sickle
  • 1,298 posts
  • LocationConnecticut

Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:48 PM

View PostSMDMadCow, on 04 June 2013 - 10:44 AM, said:

Will the E HPs matter when people run them as AC40 Jagers?

I suspect most people will still run them that way. Yes, you COULD run them with large lasers and AC5s in the arms or several PPCs or what ever nifty combination you could think of to take advantage of the arm mounted energy slots. But in the end I suspect we'll see most people running with AC40 Jagers or load the thing with PPCs because min/maxing has no place for creativity or originality.

#192 SpartanFiredog317

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Decimator
  • The Decimator
  • 176 posts
  • LocationMighty MO

Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:59 PM

UAC5 x2 6x ML .....near perfect ambusher. Friday is payday....

#193 Hauser

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 976 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 02:20 PM

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...71c4974741663d0

I'm playing this right now and it seriously kicks ***. Fast enough to manoeuvre and maintain the range. I'm not using ERPPC's because they run to hot for good damage output at range. The 4 mlas work nicely at shorter range.

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...22b9f8969639e68

Now I've tried this yet. I'm afraid it might be to fragile but at 90kphs and 43% cooling it looks tempting. It can sustain constant ppc fire or 18 seconds of alpha.

#194 Angel of Annihilation

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Infernal
  • The Infernal
  • 8,881 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 02:51 PM

Wish they had a try before you buy option on these real money mechs. So far I have been lucky in my purchase of Flame and Heavy Metal although the game has changed enough now that Flame really isn't as good mech as it was when I bought it. However I hate to spend almost 5000 MC on a mech I don't even know if I will enjoy.

#195 LTGear

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 87 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationPhilippines

Posted 04 June 2013 - 05:12 PM

what i need is a 70 ton jagger with jumpjets & with 6 ballistic hard points.

#196 Phashe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 324 posts
  • LocationBuckeye stuck in Michigan

Posted 04 June 2013 - 05:24 PM

View PostInMidnightClad, on 28 May 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:

Well... As a light pilot I was hoping against hope that this hero was going to be either a Spider or Raven... Guess us lights will just go back to our... *Grimace* Deaths Knell while all the rest of you guys work on your 3-4 Hero mechs per weight class.

Also on a separate rant. When are they going to go back to giving us a little bit of lore with these things instead of just slapping a pretty paint job on a bill and calling it a day. When they first started going off cannon for Heros I was fine with it. Because those first few all had written stories that made them part of the fluff, Expanded the universe. Now i just feel like I'm being marketed to and I want to go back to not seeing behind the curtains.


You do understand that bigger mechs mean bigger bucks to PGI, right? :-) 4,000MC-7,000MC each - ouch. It is a business afterall I guess.

All I want is a Heavy Machine Gun or ballistic 2-5t weapon... Maybe a third Dragon Hero... LOL

#197 SpartanFiredog317

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Decimator
  • The Decimator
  • 176 posts
  • LocationMighty MO

Posted 04 June 2013 - 05:56 PM

View PostLTGear, on 04 June 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

what i need is a 70 ton jagger with jumpjets & with 6 ballistic hard points.
Take the missile and energy hardpoints away from the CTF4X, add two ballistic slots in the torsos, add Jumpjets and boost the engine rating to a 360.... Beautiful.

#198 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 04 June 2013 - 06:41 PM

View PostHauser, on 04 June 2013 - 02:20 PM, said:

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...71c4974741663d0

I'm playing this right now and it seriously kicks ***. Fast enough to manoeuvre and maintain the range. I'm not using ERPPC's because they run to hot for good damage output at range. The 4 mlas work nicely at shorter range.

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...22b9f8969639e68

Now I've tried this yet. I'm afraid it might be to fragile but at 90kphs and 43% cooling it looks tempting. It can sustain constant ppc fire or 18 seconds of alpha.

i run XLs in most of my Jagers. HArdly find em fragile.

#199 Bagheera

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,920 posts
  • LocationStrong and Pretty

Posted 04 June 2013 - 06:43 PM

So, it seems we are okay with hero mechs being, by and large, faster than their counterparts?

Appears to be the general consensus as they've come along, anyway.

Edited by Bagheera, 04 June 2013 - 06:44 PM.


#200 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 04 June 2013 - 06:46 PM

View PostBagheera, on 04 June 2013 - 06:43 PM, said:

So, it seems we are okay with hero mechs being, by and large, faster than their counterparts?

Appears to be the general consensus as they've come along, anyway.

until I actually find Heros taking over the Meta due to their "superiority" I have no issue. It certainly ain't happened yet. Heavy Metal and Misery were both screamed P2W.... and were laughably not.





13 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 13 guests, 0 anonymous users