Hammertrial, on 07 June 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:
Wow...this post got entirely screwed up somehow....Editting most of it back in...
EDIT:
I would argue that a 3rd person only queue is a special game setting. After all, special is having a specific or particular function, purpose, etc. of which 3rd person only is.
I completely arguree that its a nightmare in terms of clarity! But to argue that 3rd person was promised and guarenteed to never be in the game just has no basis in reality from that post. And thats the issue I take with it.
I argue with lawyers for a living, and so I'm pretty heavily reliant on facts. After all, opinions are like ********, everyone has one.
The fact is, that post clearly indicates 3rd at the very least being investigated for the future (in which case the invesigation clearly gave a greenlight). You also can't argue that the 100% first person contradicts the third person and is the ruling statement without also arguing that the third person contradicts the 100% first and is the ruling statement. Could PGI have been more clear, YES!
There are so many other reasons to be upset at PGI (DX11, 12v12, CW, collisions) that have clear timelines and dates that you can readily find that aren't being met and delayed near indefinitely.
But yet we have these completely overblown reactions to 3rd and the Orion not being released this month, two things that were NEVER PROMISED. There is 0 evidence of either statements being made.
You can have your opinions, you can't have your own facts.
Fair enough. I think we can be friends

My condolences for your frequent interactions with lawyers. I am forced to spend my days poring over and conducting line-by-line analyses of texts (political memos, poetry, speeches, plays, etc) in both English and Spanish so logical consistency and speaker intent is also very much so ingrained in my poor brain.
Like you said, in that notorious post, the former also contradicts the latter so a person reading the second half of the post would be as correct in their interpretation as someone reading the first. It would appear that that particular perspective has been lost, so I apologize for neglecting it. At least we are in agreement about the lack of clarity!
I won't lie, 3PV in and of itself isn't
really that big of a deal for me. I started playing this game after 3PV was already announced so it was something which I had already accepted. My issue is more due to the lack of clarity and communication from our developer overlords. I genuinely enjoy this game. The lastest patch shows that PGI is on the right track, and I haven't had this much fun in-game in a long time.
However, their communication desperately needs help. To use Orion-gate as an example, a large segment (I won't say majority because I don't have numbers, but it
seems like a majority) of this community genuinely believed it was the next mech. Syllogy even had it slated as such in his Upcoming Features thread, a thread that is also stickied and thus tacitly approved by this company. If it was never meant to be the next mech, as the story seems to be, then someone should have popped in and said "sorry for the confusion, but the Orion is not coming in June. Expect an announcement soon!" Is this a small, perhaps irrelevant incident in terms of its import? Of course. It's just one batch of polygons and pixels instead of another. However, believe it or not, a lot of people were really looking forward to the ugly thing and now feel like they have been baited-and-switched. One cannot rationalize emotion or disappointment, especially since the miscommunication never had to happen.
We always hear that they are short-staffed so if that is responsible, so be it. I just really, genuinely hope that this whole toxic experience has turned a few heads and taught PGI to do some logic-checks on their statements and to be a little more interactive, although, at this point, the community is a bit on the insurgent side.
TL;DR: Two forum adversaries reach a truce!