Wintersdark, on 04 October 2013 - 07:50 AM, said:
*shrugs* I suspected this at the beginning (see: my comments early in the thread), but with that said I'm happier they did it this way.
You seem to be saying this disparagingly, but that's the wrong approach as a customer. This way is win-win; we get Cool Toys For Free, they get happy bragging rights. Everyone wins. If they'd set "Real Goals" and shared them; it would be entirely possible they could either set them too low (everyone mocks how low they are, they're achieved too early uselessly) or set them too high resulting in "omg look at how poor sales are" and sadness at people not getting the goal rewards. It's not like you can do anything beyond buying the pack yourself, so people's contributions to it are limited.
In the end, though, just be happy we get cool stuff and everyone wins.
Mind you, it could well have been legit too - we have no way to really know. I do know that I held off on picking up the saber pack till just before it clicked over to "met the goal", hell, mine may well have been the final purchase that did it. I was really torn about getting it - new baby, so funds are tight, and as awesome as the Wolvy and Griffy are, I already had the Overlord pack... but I really wanted those flame patterns
So you like being manipulated? You are a fan of the company using smoke and mirrors to show how well they are doing? I disparage anything that reeks of well lies. If they put up a number and hit it, that would show that the game is going according to their plans. If they didn't hit it, that would show they need to do something. Faking it just shows they can do marketing.
Hardly a win win. Sure I get a pattern for free but they can now act like everything is fine, even if it's not. Knights in White are touted how the fact that they never give in on any of their decisions, no matter how ill advised they appear ( or how pro reviewers complain about them) shows they don't have to care about the community. This just gives them more fuel to say tell the forums to go **** themselves, they are still making money.
Real numbers could have shown they were right, but since they didn't its fair to conclude the numbers aren't right. Of course again if this isn't true, PGI has all the numbers and could tell us. They never do, so once again fair to conclude things aren't going well. Just check the player counter....oh wait removed. So basically things are going so great that PGI has to hide their numbers. That makes sense. Lots of successful F2Ps don't have a player counter or brag about concurrent players... what's that you say, the successful ones do. Hmm what does that say again about how well things are going?
Well they haven't gone back on their decisions so it must be good numbers or ego. They never share any relevant numbers. Don't give me player retention up claim that was 1 WEEK after 3pv or the tutorial added. Don't give me how many registrations. Give me a player counter or concurrent players or I will continue to believe those numbers aren't in your favor. No one hides good numbers.
I'm sure all the meh reviews are going to draw in tons of the casuals they desire.