#21
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:14 AM
#22
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:15 AM
#24
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:17 AM
#25
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:17 AM
Do they have legal reasons now for not adding canon custom Mechs? I want my Poke-Mech Collectibles!
Besides, piloting Danielle's Wolf Dragoon Mech would be way awesomer, especially with their paint schemes and unit symbols.
Edited by General Taskeen, 24 September 2013 - 09:24 AM.
#26
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:18 AM
#27
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:18 AM
#28
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:21 AM
#29
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:24 AM
#30
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:24 AM
#31
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:26 AM
Khobai, on 24 September 2013 - 09:14 AM, said:
What. Pay to win. Pfft. If you've blown up one atlas you blown them all up. Saying pay to win when it comes to mechs is just silly.
#32
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:27 AM
#33
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:28 AM
Tragos, on 24 September 2013 - 09:24 AM, said:
I feel PGI it's hesitant to release a big ballistic Assault specially when it means a large part of the Tryhards will go for the 2x Ac 20 without drawbacks mech.
Still i'm curious for the exact ballistic and missile hardpoints in the torsos but y expect 1of each total
#34
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:29 AM
#36
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:31 AM
....with that being said...
instead of giving us another IS 100t mech ( ... oh IDK, the Fafnir maybe) they hero up a founders mech......
..... still going to buy it (when it goes on sale)...
just kinda gets me how greedy PGI is getting
Just sayin...
#37
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:32 AM
Malsumis, on 24 September 2013 - 09:29 AM, said:
Go spend it on a $110.00 Hornet not even out game called Star Citizen along with a $5.00 poster and $10.00 guns. Or you can always get the $40.00 Nightmare from Neverwinter that runs you down the road. You do have options you know.
#38
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:32 AM
Quote
Eh now theres no reason to use an RS at all. This thing is outright better. Its arguably even better than a D-DC.
Quote
Not really. Tanks that use gold ammo in WoT can still be killed by tanks that dont use gold ammo, it doesnt mean gold ammo isnt pay to win. Pay to win is whenever paying gives you an advantage you wouldnt get from not paying. This hero Atlas is outright better than an RS. That is pay to win.
It may not be an extreme case, but thats not the point, the point is if players allow it, PGI will continue pushing the limits of pay to win.
Edited by Khobai, 24 September 2013 - 09:50 AM.
#39
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:32 AM
#40
Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:36 AM
Stormlight, on 24 September 2013 - 09:31 AM, said:
....with that being said...
instead of giving us another IS 100t mech ( ... oh IDK, the Fafnir maybe) they hero up a founders mech......
..... still going to buy it (when it goes on sale)...
just kinda gets me how greedy PGI is getting
Just sayin...
Nah in last ATD Pgi said they going to use the 3-4 months of advantge fom Phoenix to fully develop and test the upcoming Clan mechs.
So it's far easier to develop hero mech for already existing chassis, specially when ppl asked a lot of times for hero mechs for founder chassis
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users