DavidStarr, on 25 January 2017 - 12:01 AM, said:
I think you've grasped the mixed LRM platform's dilemma rather well, and it seems about right to me. Most of my mechs don't have TAG nor Artemis, but I do play a lot of mixed loadouts when it comes to LRMs.
So, I'll say, absolutely correct from what I've read.
Teer Kerensky, on 25 January 2017 - 04:14 AM, said:
And here, I'd like to mention, you've caught the other side of the topic. You are also completely correct.
There is an advantage and a disadvantage to each concept, and most of it is how you intend to use your build. Though I don't advise an indirect only/mostly build, it is a play style and if coordinated within a team it can be highly effective. If with PUGs, it's a chancy build and PUGs do benefit from having more armor up front and more tightly grouped teams. AKA: PUGs don't like LRM boats that hide in the back, because they tend to hide too far in the back.
It's all depends upon what you team will work with, and what you intend to get out of your mech. So, you each appear completely correct, from the different standpoints of mech construction and the LRM dilemma when building a mech with them on.