1126 replies to this topic

[Roadbeer]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 07:05 PM, said:

Let me sum up your position:

Yeah, because I've always been so down on PGI and just love raging against the machine.

[a uberboy]

so the match maker will enforce only one 2-4 man group per side, why don't they create an additional 5-X man group size, where the MM will place one 5-X on the opposing side?

[Heffay]

Roadbeer, on 14 April 2014 - 07:07 PM, said:

Yeah, because I've always been so down on PGI and just love raging against the machine.

Always? You ask for group queues larger than 4 mans. PGI says "Ok, we'll look at it and here's our tentative plan." You whine.

That sum it up about right?

[Roadbeer]

Craig Steele, on 14 April 2014 - 06:58 PM, said:

People should focus on reading the post, and not overlaying their agenda to read what they want.

They're so cute when they're new and young and haven't been beat down by Paul post after Paul post

[Sandpit]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 06:57 PM, said:

Sorry, been busy having a life. Can you repeat the questions?

posting on reddit?

[Heffay]

Roadbeer, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

They're so cute when they're new and young and haven't been beat down by Paul post after Paul post

And, I rest my case.

[Roadbeer]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

Always? You ask for group queues larger than 4 mans. PGI says "Ok, we'll look at it and here's our tentative plan." You whine.

That sum it up about right?

Where's the plan in that again? We'll back burner it until we decide we really don't want to do it is all I'm getting out of that post

[Heffay]

Sandpit, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

posting on reddit?

I think Silent had you pegged. What was that quote you made again? I'll have to dig it up.

[Ngamok]

Deathlike, on 14 April 2014 - 04:26 PM, said:

You do realize that one match doesn't equal "owning someone". Even then, I die in many many ways, probably @ a comical rate. I'm not losing sleep over it.

Well, you should be. Nightmares !

[Sandpit]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 07:01 PM, said:

Probably meaningless drivel about how group features PGI is implementing doesn't meet your particularly entitled sense of what a group feature should have, therefore they aren't providing group features.

Heard any good misogynistic jokes lately?

show me again where PGI is implementing what you're talking about outside of private premium matches that we already knew about?

[Roadbeer]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

And, I rest my case.

Still waiting on you to show me where there is a plan or promise of implementation of group support there Boss.

[Amsro]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

And, I rest my case.

You havn't made one.

Can you give one "good" argument against a solo only que?

[Sandpit]

Belorion, on 14 April 2014 - 07:04 PM, said:

I certainly support the idea of a group que. I would even be willing to drop solo in the group que if it means being able to have groups with 11 people in them.

Yet another one Paul

[Heffay]

Amsro, on 14 April 2014 - 07:11 PM, said:

You havn't made one.

Can you give one "good" argument against a solo only que?

Splitting up the public queue doesn't help the game.

[Craig Steele]

Roadbeer, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

They're so cute when they're new and young and haven't been beat down by Paul post after Paul post

Ahhhh, the old "I'm a founder and your opinion is worthless cause you haven't done your time" line, reworded for current context.

What can I say, bitter and twisted just isn't an attractive look, no matter how much time you've done.

[Roadbeer]

Heffay, on 14 April 2014 - 07:09 PM, said:

I think Silent had you pegged. What was that quote you made again? I'll have to dig it up.

LOL, when Heffay starts quoting Silent, you KNOW this place is falling apart.

[Heffay]

Roadbeer, on 14 April 2014 - 07:12 PM, said:

LOL, when Heffay starts quoting Silent, you KNOW this place is falling apart.

On the contrary, as long as PGI doesn't listen to you, they'll be just fine.

And i'm not quoting Silent. I'm asking for Sandpit's quote. Do *you* remember what it is?

Edited by Heffay, 14 April 2014 - 07:13 PM.

[FupDup]

Me watching you guys argue:

[Bhael Fire]

a uberboy, on 14 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:

so the match maker will enforce only one 2-4 man group per side, why don't they create an additional 5-X man group size, where the MM will place one 5-X on the opposing side?

Here's the latest proposal and summary:

Bhael Fire, on 14 April 2014 - 06:13 PM, said:

Just so this stays fresh for those too lazy to go through the thread I'm reposting the gist of the current queue structure proposal:

SOLO ONLY queue

• Solo players only
  
• No groups

GROUPS (2-12) + SOLO Queue

• Allows groups with 2-12 players
  
• Allows solo players with groups enabled in launch preferences (+10,000 C-Bill "Hazard Pay" bonus)
  
• Solo players with groups enabled drop in both solo and group queues
  
• Matches large groups first, then small groups, then solo players (so 12-mans are likely to face other 12-mans)
  
• Matches groups on a 1:1 basis (or as close as possible)
  
• Never more than 1 solo player per team (to minimize PUG stompage in the group queue)
  
• Never more than 3 groups per team (i.e. no teams made up entirely of 2-mans or 3-mans)
  
• Drawback: Wait times longer than solo only queue

[Ngamok]

Imperius, on 14 April 2014 - 05:06 PM, said:

Well technically a continent is a big Island