Edited by RkAngel Crow, 24 July 2012 - 10:23 AM.
Snow Raven Chatterweb
#301
Posted 24 July 2012 - 09:18 AM
#302
Posted 25 July 2012 - 01:49 AM
I could claim the same, we were CSR NBT more than 10 years ago, I was the Loremaster and a GalCom, which would make me a highranking and founding officer of that clan as well just in NBT... hmmm,.... so now we would be at the point of:
my league used to be more important than yours !!! ...AND that is definately behaviour for childs, and I forbid my son to behave like that all the time.
When our Clan entered the NBT more than 10 years ago, we used to be Clan Wolf in all of the other leagues we played in. In NBT Clan Wolf was already given to another unit, so we adapted, became CSR and conquered Terra.
From how I see it, CSR is claimed by a unit, and now some other unit shows up and says: Hey, but back in the days when our league was famous, we were the original CSRs and we want that name here too. That sounds a bit rediculous, quiaff? Only way you could force that on a clanner would be by trial of possession.
Edited by Noakei Siegel, 25 July 2012 - 01:49 AM.
#303
Posted 25 July 2012 - 06:27 AM
Also on that note why dont we all sit down at some point and try to work it out to where we have a REALLY big CSR that would make us feared beyond belief. I think we can have two factions or one where we trial to get someone on top. If i am going to work for a merc unit for now i want the clan experience later. And that means we will have to impose the experience on ourselves. Also that might mean some of the old timers might have to make way, God knows i plan to work out my own niche. While doing it for the glory of the Unit. Hell i am doing that right now in real life LOL.
#304
Posted 27 July 2012 - 10:34 AM
I agree with Direalien, if they did allow a player unit to claim control of CSR there is no reason we cannot have two merc units working within that each supplying a Khan/saKhan to guide the clan while we conduct our actual battles ourselves as would seperat galaxies.
The more Ravens the better.
Edited by Fiachdubh, 27 July 2012 - 10:38 AM.
#305
Posted 28 July 2012 - 04:38 AM
Since they do not want us to use canon faction names, the logical choice would be something like the "The Black Wing" or something similar.
Edited by Elsydeon, 28 July 2012 - 04:43 AM.
#306
Posted 28 July 2012 - 10:34 AM
Played WoW myself, along with a couple other of our members. My son loves Guild Wars and is impatiently waiting for Guild Wars 2 to be available for him to purchase...lol. If you would like to join up with Spectre's Ravens you are more than welcome to do so, just send me a private message and I will help you get set up. As far as being the new guy...we were all the new guy once. We have a few new people in our unit, along with some members that have known each other for the past 10 years or so. I am sure you will fit in perfectly if you so wish to join up. Just let me know.
Edited by RkAngel Crow, 28 July 2012 - 08:23 PM.
#307
Posted 29 July 2012 - 09:50 PM
#308
Posted 30 July 2012 - 08:12 AM
#309
Posted 30 July 2012 - 06:39 PM
#310
Posted 30 July 2012 - 07:23 PM
#311
Posted 30 July 2012 - 07:36 PM
Let us crack this down to the bare minimum eh? Maybe we should solve this the old Clansman way. That is how I got my bloodname, and that is how I got promoted to Khan. I say if everyone wants a place we should do things by tradition. Not by whose seniority is longer, or whose got the bigger "piece". Let us behave like Clansmen here, quiaff? After all, that is what we are really arguing about right? Personally, we should all be part of the same team. And it is not even relevant right now, seeing as to how there are no Clans yet.
#312
Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:11 AM
NBT SR is definately hitting the servers, got in touch with most of our old bunch and they are locked and loaded.
Edited by Noakei Siegel, 31 July 2012 - 06:12 AM.
#313
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:40 AM
#314
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:55 AM
#315
Posted 31 July 2012 - 11:22 AM
RkAngel Crow, on 24 July 2012 - 09:18 AM, said:
From what I've learned from Russ is that if there is a confrontation of wanting the same Named clan, it will be settled on the Battlefield. It is not just who gets the name first.
All I am saying is that BBK wants the name as well and will be ready to fight for it. I dont mean any disrespect to you guys, but it will be settled on the battlefield if needed. Should it come down to it and you guys win, we will respectfully withdraw and no hard feelings will come from us. The fairest way to do it is settle it on the battlefield.
#316
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:13 PM
Wolfclaw, on 31 July 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
From what I've learned from Russ is that if there is a confrontation of wanting the same Named clan, it will be settled on the Battlefield. It is not just who gets the name first.
All I am saying is that BBK wants the name as well and will be ready to fight for it. I dont mean any disrespect to you guys, but it will be settled on the battlefield if needed. Should it come down to it and you guys win, we will respectfully withdraw and no hard feelings will come from us. The fairest way to do it is settle it on the battlefield.
Hear hear
EDIT: *looks down a post* Well... it appears **** just got real.
Edited by Enig, 31 July 2012 - 12:52 PM.
#317
Posted 31 July 2012 - 12:49 PM
#318
Posted 31 July 2012 - 04:27 PM
#320
Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:52 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users