297 replies to this topic

[Sandpit]

BLOOD WOLF, on 27 August 2014 - 06:47 PM, said:

I am not a Liar, now you got me mad. I have not lied a day in my life. I only edit if i see error in what I wrote or occasionally miswrite something. Do not call me a Liar, becuase you are going to make this real personal.

BLOOD WOLF, on 27 August 2014 - 01:26 PM, said:

Who is still hurt over 2 years ago. Its coming this year(few months to be exact, stop being sour for no good reason. You get what was promised, and more will come. Who cares or even dwells on something 2 years ago. That is the longest grudge I have seen on a forum.

I cant even believe i am entertaining the thought, because it is 2 years later, it is disregarded? its CW, who cares if it should have been. If i can play it know that should be all that matters.

To be fair, it will probably need some work after release. The strategy of fast release has not always worked in favor.

there's the edited post

and there's the one before you edited

want me to go back through and keep doing this or do you jsut want to go ahead and admit now you lied to save face? If you want any credibility when it comes to commenting on this game you might want to think about this.

I didnt' make it personal, YOU lied. That's not a malicious "name calling", that's a factual statement. I can't help it if you were dishonest in an attempt to make me look like I was wrong and/or lying

[BLOOD WOLF]

I still stand by what I wrote. I never lied, and that post doesn't even show that I lied about anything. It still matches my attitude towards the matter.

you are just really ego driven and looking to make this a right or wrong argument for some reason.

I did not lie about anything. Also your not being specific about what I lied about. What reason do I have to lie in the first place.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:10 PM.

[Sandpit]

BLOOD WOLF, on 27 August 2014 - 07:06 PM, said:

I still stand by what I wrote. I never lied, and that post doesn't even show that I lied about anything. It still matches my attitude towards the matter.

you are just really ego driven and looking to make this a right or wrong argument for some reason.

I did not lie about anything. Also your not being specific about what I lied about. What reason do I have to lie in the first place.

sure thing hoss
Deny all you want, you got called out on it and anyone who followed this thread now knows. I'm done with you, the sad thing is you actually have some good points once in a while, even the ones I don't agree with. Now.... well now you're just another in a long list

[BLOOD WOLF]

Sandpit, on 27 August 2014 - 07:10 PM, said:

sure thing hoss
Deny all you want, you got called out on it and anyone who followed this thread now knows. I'm done with you, the sad thing is you actually have some good points once in a while, even the ones I don't agree with. Now.... well now you're just another in a long list

Your pic didn't even show how I was lying. Which page was that.

That guy, drives me nuts. I never lied about a thing, but makes something up to keep from an explanation.

"Point is we literally have CW in our hands. Association is CW, take a piece of a brick and it is still a brick. Even if it is a part of something it is still that which is is meant to be. The Doubt should almost be gone but of course a piece is not a whole and we still wait on the latter half, which I am exited for."

I said front he beginning that association is CW, so what In the world did I lie about. Sometimes he makes no sense.

My original post is unedited, I can see that it is unedited and those are my exact views at the point of when it was written. why would I change them?

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:15 PM.

[TLBFestus]

BLOOD WOLF, on 27 August 2014 - 06:56 PM, said:

give, evidence for that claim. This time dont use multiple sources referring to the same thing, Like you did last time.

you see there. give is not capitolized, like should be lower case

that is why i edit.

At the very worst, Sandpits "evidence" is at least as good, or better than the pablum dribbling out of your mouth. The fact that he's referring to multiple instances of PGI making "90 days" comments is because THEY DID,

Did you notice that no one, Heffay, or anyone is backing you up on this? I'll tell you why, it's because you are clueless. Hopefully it's because you don't know any better, but I've already stated my opinion on that

OH..and while a piece of a brick is still a brick, a piece of a brick is NOT a wall, as you claim this lame "component" of CW is CW..

And..if you are editing..learn to spell CAPITALIZE dumbass.

Edited by TLBFestus, 27 August 2014 - 07:16 PM.

[Sandpit]

BLOOD WOLF, on 26 August 2014 - 05:12 PM, said:

funny, becuase CW arrived Today.

[BLOOD WOLF]

Sandpit, on 27 August 2014 - 07:14 PM, said:

I stand by that, technically, Association is CW, so technically it arrived today(or yesterday).

I never said otherwise.

CW is just not fully fleshed.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:16 PM.

[Sandpit]

BLOOD WOLF, on 27 August 2014 - 06:16 PM, said:

You know as well as i know, we are only at association. I never said CW was fully here, Only the first Phase.

[BLOOD WOLF]

"was fully here", is your reading comprehension up to par?

I said it was not fully here, I never said it wasn't here

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:17 PM.

[Sandpit]

you're not helping yourself any. I'm done with you.
gl&gh in your future endeavors slick

[BLOOD WOLF]

Sandpit, on 27 August 2014 - 07:17 PM, said:

you're not helping yourself any. I'm done with you.
gl&gh in your future endeavors slick

BLOOD WOLF, on 27 August 2014 - 07:17 PM, said:

"was fully here", is your reading comprehension up to par?

I said it was not fully here, I never said it wasn't here

same here. Like i said I never lied, and now i think you dont understand the difference in what i said.

next time you want to dance for a few pages, give me a notice.

Also I am sure you have contradicted yourself from time to time and have been called out on it.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:25 PM.

[Roland]

Roland, on 27 August 2014 - 06:18 PM, said:

This thread is by blood wolf.
I am thinking something.
I will not say what I am thinking.
You know what I am thinking.

[TLBFestus]

Oh...look, he's now falling back on the word "technically".

"Technically" Bill Clinton didn't have sex with Monica Lewinsky.

"Technically" The US never went to war with Granada or Vietnam

"Technically" you have a clue about what you are talking about

[BLOOD WOLF]

Roland, on 27 August 2014 - 07:25 PM, said:

Might want to be careful there, sandpit just dug himself a hole. Calling me a liar on something i never lied about, and failing to properly understand my quotes. Easy there.

TLBFestus, on 27 August 2014 - 07:29 PM, said:

Oh...look, he's now falling back on the word "technically".

"Technically" Bill Clinton didn't have sex with Monica Lewinsky.

"Technically" The US never went to war with Granada or Vietnam

"Technically" you have a clue about what you are talking about

you do know what the word technically means right? it means facts or in accordance with facts.

So technically, besides sandpit, the pit squad are gonna troll right?

OOPS, I edited my post because I misspelled sandpit then corrected. Does it still count.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:32 PM.

[Sandpit]

TLBFestus, on 27 August 2014 - 07:29 PM, said:

Oh...look, he's now falling back on the word "technically".

"Technically" Bill Clinton didn't have sex with Monica Lewinsky.

"Technically" The US never went to war with Granada or Vietnam

"Technically" you have a clue about what you are talking about

I just ignored him, he's joined the exclusive club along with a few others that have no desire to actually have constructive discussions.

[BLOOD WOLF]

Sandpit, on 27 August 2014 - 07:32 PM, said:

I just ignored him, he's joined the exclusive club along with a few others that have no desire to actually have constructive discussions.

Like the one I was having before the loiter squad decided that any thread by me needs immediate derailing?

According to Roland, its just another bloodwolf thread, so call in the squad.

I really hope you guys do not do this for my next thread in October, and I can finally keep to sanpit's hinting towards actuall discussion.

Also sandpit, how is Roland, and TLB trying to have a constructive discussion. Stop playing favorites.

I can honor your request and try to get back to a constructive discussion. That depends on you guys, Of course the Fair sandpit is going make sure we stay on topic and constructive right?

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:36 PM.

[Sandpit]

It's one thing to make a mistake, contradict yourself, etc.

It's entirely different to make multiple statements, then when someone calls you on it to actually go back and edit every single one of the posts you said it and redact them. That's a whole new level of trollism. I've seen people do a post here or there but never seen anyone go back and edit every single one of their posts like that and then think people are stupid enough to fall for it.
smh

[BLOOD WOLF]

Sandpit, on 27 August 2014 - 07:34 PM, said:

It's one thing to make a mistake, contradict yourself, etc.

It's entirely different to make multiple statements, then when someone calls you on it to actually go back and edit every single one of the posts you said it and redact them. That's a whole new level of trollism. I've seen people do a post here or there but never seen anyone go back and edit every single one of their posts like that and then think people are stupid enough to fall for it.
smh

Read the OP(original post, its unedited). I dont lie buddy, I believe in things you dont. If i lie I will pay for it later and I wont risk that one a game forum.

I also dont go back and redact anything. If i did i would need good reason.

READ THE OP, THEN READ THE QUOTE YOU GAVE IN WHICH I LIED. I DIDNT LIE, YOU JUST GOT IT MIXED UP.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 27 August 2014 - 07:40 PM.

[Koniving]

"Take a piece of a brick" and it's a pebble.
Take a piece of a building and it's still a brick.

What we have is one of many lego bricks that we need to build a wall. You can put it on the ground and call it a wall, but it's still a brick.

We will get more bricks. But please, do not call it a wall. This is a unit association function and a map with many obvious planets as well as many hidden easter egg planets in the periphery. I'm actually pleasantly surprised it is that detailed. Still, we have two bricks. One is a foundation standard for all free to play games, Unit Association. The other is a nice thing to look at until we can interact with it, common in virtually every game that involves travel. It is part of community warfare, but if you were to call that Community Warfare, then you may as well call it done.

That is all.
As for what I would call Community Warfare, taking everything ever said since 2012 as 'features' and things we were to get or have by the time CW comes out... and you have the huge example scenario in the signature link on the left.

[Sandpit]

Koniving, on 27 August 2014 - 07:38 PM, said:

"Take a piece of a brick" and it's a pebble.
Take a piece of a building and it's still a brick.

What we have is one of many lego bricks that we need to build a wall. You can put it on the ground and call it a wall, but it's still a brick.

We will get more bricks. But please, do not call it a wall. This is a unit association function and a map with many obvious planets as well as many hidden easter egg planets in the periphery. I'm actually pleasantly surprised it is that detailed. Still, we have two bricks. One is a foundation standard for all free to play games, Unit Association. The other is a nice thing to look at until we can interact with it, common in virtually every game that involves travel. It is part of community warfare, but if you were to call that Community Warfare, then you may as well call it done.

That is all.
As for what I would call Community Warfare, taking everything ever said since 2012 as 'features' and things we were to get or have by the time CW comes out... and you have the huge example scenario in the signature link on the left.

I'm actually more concerned with the roadmap reading "75% complete" for CW. If this is 3.4 of CW then I'm a bit worried...