How much would you pay for a Warhammer?
#41
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:44 PM
But lets be real, there's real life lawsuits over these images and I'm perfectly okay with keeping this game free to use the 'mechs already available rather than have PG spend money to try to get licenses for these images.
#42
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:46 PM
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Unseen
Stinger
Wasp
Valkyrie
Phoenix Hawk
Crusader
Falcon
Firebee
Hornet
Ostroc
Ostol
Ostscout
Behemoth
Archer
Warhammer
Rifleman
Longbow
Marauder
Shadow Hawk
Griffin
Scorpion
Wolverine
Thunderbolt
Goliath
Battlemaster
Most of what I think of as battlemechs from when I played back in the day are on this list.
#44
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:59 PM
Xmador, on 25 June 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:
But lets be real, there's real life lawsuits over these images and I'm perfectly okay with keeping this game free to use the 'mechs already available rather than have PG spend money to try to get licenses for these images.
Its mainly because they are the mechs that launched the game. http://en.wikipedia....h#Original_game
#45
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:13 PM
#46
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:17 PM
9 out of 12 Mechs in Citytech are unseen.
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/CityTech
#47
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:19 PM
Easily, on 25 June 2012 - 01:41 PM, said:
However, I don't agree with making them only available to people who pay for them.
That would instantly turn the game into 'pay to win' (ignoring for a moment whether or not the Unseen are actually 'stronger' than other 'mechs).
/rant
Really???? Really???
Pay to win??
I feel people don't even know what that means anymore. They just throw it around anytime somebody might ask them to pay for something.
If you can build the exact same mech using another chassis. . . how the **** is it 'pay to win' to pay to use a different chassis for the same mech.
That is a strictly cosmetic improvement.
As somebody who *IS* going to support this game. . . the game hasn't even launched yet and I'm already tired of 'welfare warriors' complaining about it when I pay my money to allow them to play for free!!! ***?!?!
/endrant
Edit: This really should have been in all caps.
Edited by Death Mallet, 25 June 2012 - 03:20 PM.
#48
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:22 PM
#49
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:25 PM
#50
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:26 PM
MinionJoe, on 25 June 2012 - 01:46 PM, said:
I must have missed that. Do you (or anyone reading this) happen to have a link to where the developer's said that?
It's my understanding that the Unseen mechs have given the BattleTech franchise legal trouble time and time again.
Yeah sure, here it is...
DevBlog0 said:
Contrary to all the press and speculation that Harmony Gold was getting in the way of a deal or development, this had no impact whatsoever on development or signing a deal for MechWarrior.
SOURCE
Edited by Reoh, 25 June 2012 - 03:27 PM.
#51
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:27 PM
Easily, on 25 June 2012 - 01:41 PM, said:
However, I don't agree with making them only available to people who pay for them.
That would instantly turn the game into 'pay to win' (ignoring for a moment whether or not the Unseen are actually 'stronger' than other 'mechs).
If anything, cover the costs of bringing the Unseen into the game with profit made by all microtransactions combined.
#52
Posted 25 June 2012 - 03:54 PM
As for Premium Unseen, there are a few I'd shell out for, Thunderbolt and Crusader instantly come to mind, I love those tin-beasties.
#53
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:02 PM
#54
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:09 PM
#55
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:15 PM
#57
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:26 PM
1) Locust
2) Warhammer
3) Marauder
4) Battlemaster.
There should be no extra cost for these mechs, they are just different designs in the appropraite weight catagory.
#58
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:32 PM
trycksh0t, on 25 June 2012 - 03:54 PM, said:
As for Premium Unseen, there are a few I'd shell out for, Thunderbolt and Crusader instantly come to mind, I love those tin-beasties.
#59
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:41 PM
My soul or 30$
Or the Rifleman with rotary ACs, Battlemaster & Marauder are OK.
Edited by Tooninki, 25 June 2012 - 04:52 PM.
#60
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:47 PM
Edited by Eiki, 25 June 2012 - 04:48 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



















