Merky Merc, on 02 March 2013 - 09:44 AM, said:
If that is your only issue with much of that early BT art then you must not have seen much of it
![^_^](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
Even if the chest is angled down doesn't mean the launch tubes angle that way. Not going to debate that it's a dumb idea.. lol
Stone Profit, on 02 March 2013 - 10:24 AM, said:
The Hatamoto Kaeru? With torpedos and such? Perhaps the chi instead.
Used the Kaeru's pic due to it still being a Hatamo-chi just modified, and that's an example of how cool it could look in MW:O. (Well, cooler since Flying Debris is some kind of concept art wizard. Still love Shimmering Sword though...)
Strum Wealh, on 02 March 2013 - 02:13 PM, said:
Ironically, none of the canon
Cyclops variants mounts an ECM suite.
In fact, the
Cyclops is generally known for equipment like Command Consoles (mounted by the CP-10-Z-DC and CP-11-A-DC variants) and Collapsible Command Modules (mounted by the CP-10-HQ variant) - both of which canonically provide ECCM/Counter-ECM capabilities.
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.png)
AS7-D-DC doesn't mount ECM in canon either. No reason a Cyclops variant can't or it having ECM making or breaking it's inclusion. The only ECM equipped Atlas doesn't happen till the Jihad.
Lonestar1771, on 02 March 2013 - 02:18 PM, said:
Lol, I stand corrected and happy because that's one less reason to have another mini-atlas.
Most 'mechs in the game could be said to be "another mini-atlas." Anything under the Atlas unless it's a pure variant (and by that I mean pure energy, pure missile, pure ballistic,) falls under that category. That's where variant variance comes into play, and PGI's been shown to add/move hardpoints.
Edited by Jack Gallows, 02 March 2013 - 03:46 PM.