

#6261
Posted 07 December 2013 - 07:56 AM
#6262
Posted 07 December 2013 - 07:58 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 07 December 2013 - 07:42 AM, said:
And it certainly won't encourage more players to try Mediums if they have more choices in Heavies or Assaults. ECM Cics, Shads and Cents prove people WILL drive Mediums if they are well done. We now need more options to bring down the drop weights.
People will keep piloting them if they are effective designs, not if there are numerous chassis.
#6263
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:00 AM
Odanan, on 07 December 2013 - 07:58 AM, said:
Variety will also be vital. As the y need the available variants to not only fit each role, but each playstyle. Focusing on adding more variety to chassis that should be LESS frequent in the game make zero sense.
#6264
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:02 AM



#6266
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:07 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 07 December 2013 - 08:00 AM, said:
The thing is: this game has nothing to do with the lore. We don't even play with stock mechs.
I like the symmetry for numbers of each weight class. It's elegant.
#6267
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:10 AM
Odanan, on 07 December 2013 - 08:07 AM, said:
I like the symmetry for numbers of each weight class. It's elegant.
one mans elegance is another mans laziness.
If they want the game weighted one direction or another, they need to focus development in that direction. Thats smart design. Forced symmetry is not elegance, it lack of imagination. It's... Germanic. >True elegance is organic and asymmetrical.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 07 December 2013 - 08:11 AM.
#6268
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:18 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 07 December 2013 - 08:10 AM, said:
If they want the game weighted one direction or another, they need to focus development in that direction. Thats smart design. Forced symmetry is not elegance, it lack of imagination. It's... Germanic. >True elegance is organic and asymmetrical.
As a backwards Brazilian (a people who praises the improvisation), I will have to disagree with that. Messy <> smart.
Neat is the new cool.
PS: Germans are badass.
#6269
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:32 AM
Odanan, on 07 December 2013 - 08:18 AM, said:
Neat is the new cool.
PS: Germans are badass.
straight lines are for people without the skills or imagination to draw curvy ones.
#6270
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:40 AM
Odanan, on 07 December 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:



Bishop Steiner, on 07 December 2013 - 08:07 AM, said:
I thought the heavy use of mediums was because they were much cheaper to field than an assault. Heavy mechs are tactically the best option there is combining the strengths of the mediums and assaults. The sheets that Odanan posted seems to agree with that statement due to more heavy designs than any other class meaning that companies would develop more of them to increase profits. I am not 100% sure but since the Clans are not as concerned with money as an Innersphere house is there seems to be more fielded heavy mech within the Clans than any other class.
Looking from the outside, Bishop is most likely correct in that they were catering to fans but Odanan is also correct. Since PGI is following the current available builds we are going to run out of mediums to use very soon and then PGI will be accused of favoring the meta, etc. when they cannot make any more without breaking either their rules or making new designs up.
#6271
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:47 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 07 December 2013 - 08:32 AM, said:
Drawing straight lines require more skill than drawing curvy ones...

Anyway, I would prefer an equal amount of mechs for each class than any arbitrary number based on the Dev's imagination.
#6272
Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:56 AM

Edited by SgtMagor, 07 December 2013 - 08:57 AM.
#6273
Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:00 AM
#6275
Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:04 AM
Odanan, on 07 December 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:



Bishop Steiner, on 07 December 2013 - 08:07 AM, said:
Though, Oda's post just shows that the SLDF might have tended to run a bit on the heavier side; contrast this with the AFFS, DCMS, and CCAF, who tended to run lighter (the former two as a matter of doctrine, the lattermost as a matter of necessity) and compare to the LCAF (famous for their all-assault "Steiner Scout Lances") and the FWLM.
Quote
Inner Sphere average: 30% Lights, 40% Mediums, 20% Heavies, 10% Assaults
CCAF (22.66 regiments as of 3050): 30% Lights, 40% Mediums, 20% Heavies, 10% Assaults
DCMS (99 regiments as of 3050): 40% Lights, 20% Mediums, 30% Heavies, 10% Assaults
AFFS (77.33 regiments as of 3050): 30% Lights, 40% Mediums, 20% Heavies, 10% Assaults
FWLM (56 regiments as of 3050): 30% Lights, 40% Mediums, 22.5% Heavies, 7.5% Assaults
LCAF (112 regiments as of 3050): 20% Lights, 30% Mediums, 35% Heavies, 15% Assaults
The average distribution percentages are canon, as are the number of House regiments unless otherwise noted, but the varying regional distribution percentages are unofficial conjecture.
(Source: page 04 of the unofficial Faction Assignment and Rarity Tables put together by a member of the Master Unit List team)
Also, it should be noted that Sarna currently includes 124 entries for Light BattleMech chassis and 153 entries for Medium BattleMech chassis, versus 139 entries for Heavy BattleMech chassis and 118 entries for Assault BattleMech chassis - tallies that include both tech bases and all eras.
As far as BT is concerned, Bishop is largely correct on this point - Lights and Mediums would generally be the most common 'Mechs in-universe, in terms of both number of distinct chassis and number of individual units seen in each Successor State's military.
Edited by Strum Wealh, 07 December 2013 - 09:08 AM.
#6276
Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:16 AM
Strum Wealh, on 07 December 2013 - 09:04 AM, said:
A great number of chassis listed on Sarna have nothing to do with our timeline. Once I had the trouble to count the timewise chassis and Assault had more different mechs than Medium.
I agree the mediums are the most common weight class fielded in IS. But they don't have necessarily more different chassis.
And no, MWO has nothing to do with that. People will play with which is the most efficient.
#6278
Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:25 AM
#6279
Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:26 AM
Odanan, on 07 December 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:
I agree the mediums are the most common weight class fielded in IS. But they don't have necessarily more different chassis.
And no, MWO has nothing to do with that. People will play with which is the most efficient.
People tend to play assaults more even though they are not necessarily the more efficient. I have just found them the most forgiving for stupidity.
#6280
Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:30 AM
Diego Angelus, on 07 December 2013 - 09:24 AM, said:
Because we will have more and more mechs with same hardpoint layout.
So? HP layouts are not really as important to some as you may think. I know a lot of people that would rather pilot their favorite iconic mech even if it does not follow the meta. If we got the Rifleman tomorrow do you think people will ***** that all it is a 5 ton lighter Jagermech? My bet would be that 99% would throw money at PGI for it and the other 1% will say that star citizen is so much better and quit anyways.
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users