Current Smoke Jaguar Corridor Units
#81
Posted 21 January 2015 - 02:24 PM
#82
Posted 21 January 2015 - 02:29 PM
MechB Kotare, on 21 January 2015 - 02:15 PM, said:
Lol. Feel free to think that we need an average merc unit to take territories for "us". I dare you.
I never stated you needed a merc unit to take territories for you, I stated the fact that a merc unit took territories for you. There is a bit of difference between the two.
#83
Posted 21 January 2015 - 03:21 PM
QueenBlade, on 17 January 2015 - 11:16 AM, said:
Mechwarrior Von Blumen, I would like to see where this "support" against your ally is?
Last night, 228th supported CJF on Waldorff defense.
Last night, 228th supported CGB on Hermagor defense.
Last night, 228th supported CSJ on the capture of Pesht and the assault on Itabaiana.
Even dropped with a group of JGx guys on the planet Itabaiana late in the night.
Once again it would seem the members of CSJ are quick to make assumptions, rather than provide facts.
If The B33f answers me back, I shall take back everything I said, but until then I stand by my statements...
#84
Posted 21 January 2015 - 03:30 PM
#85
Posted 21 January 2015 - 03:40 PM
QueenBlade, on 21 January 2015 - 03:30 PM, said:
How many forums must be converted to this argument?
All I guess...no B33f, then we have beef...
But if we must, there is this little snippet that I find so interesting and yet not discussed...perhaps take this up with your partners...
...228th have been working with us for a good while now, however the CGB attacks were our idea from the beginning. We didn't expect them to help us full time, but we ultimately made a mistake in picking a faction riddled with stubborn people who stick to an alliance that clearly works in favor of CGB, MS and CI more then it does CSJ, but that isn't our problem anymore.
^Drunk Canuck from Jan 19th...but please continue this on the main argument page...or don't...don't care...I has Flying Whale...
Edited by Von Blumen, 21 January 2015 - 04:03 PM.
#86
Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:27 PM
#87
Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:47 PM
#88
Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:51 PM
Out of respect for the OP, I am bowing out of any more discussion on this topic here. This post was not made for this. Lukio I hereby apologize formally to you for this argument spreading to this forum. Say the word and I shall erase all posts.
#89
Posted 23 January 2015 - 09:08 PM
#90
Posted 24 January 2015 - 05:55 AM
#91
Posted 24 January 2015 - 08:46 AM
#92
Posted 25 January 2015 - 02:53 AM
Gamed with them tonight against the Marik/Liao coordinated attack on Tarazed. (Full report available on Smoke Jaguar Alliance forums: http://www.smokealliance.com )
Edited by Prussian Havoc, 27 January 2015 - 06:12 AM.
#93
Posted 26 January 2015 - 09:18 PM
#94
Posted 27 January 2015 - 10:01 AM
Updated with DERP's permcon status.
#96
Posted 28 January 2015 - 01:21 AM
Lukoi Banacek, on 27 January 2015 - 10:01 AM, said:
Updated with DERP's permcon status.
I gamed with Bloodshed and one of his guys earlier tonight. Bloodshed mentions his 13-man Unit (5 of which are on quite regularly) was taking a 28-day contract.
Solid gamers, broadcast invitations to their private TeamSpeak at the start of each match.
I would game with them again anytime.
Edited by Prussian Havoc, 28 January 2015 - 01:41 AM.
#97
Posted 28 January 2015 - 11:09 AM
MERCENARY CORPS UNITS - RECOMMENDED CONSTRAINTS, RESTRAINTS, CONSEQUENCES AND REPERCUSSIONS
Started by Prussian Havoc, Today, 01:54 PM (http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__4144456)
Please check it out and add whatever comments you would like.
A well-reasoned and constructive debate could help provide Community feedback to PGI as they go about crafting CW Phase 3 and beyond.
Thank you in advance for your time and effort in reading this and considering it.
#98
Posted 30 January 2015 - 11:41 AM
#99
Posted 30 January 2015 - 02:15 PM
Also updated to show the Phanter Jäger from Germany as a permcon unit.
#100
Posted 30 January 2015 - 02:50 PM
Glad to have you boys back for another 2 weeks.
07
Edited by Von Blumen, 30 January 2015 - 02:51 PM.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users