Jump to content

Current Smoke Jaguar Corridor Units


167 replies to this topic

#81 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 21 January 2015 - 02:24 PM

Thanks DL.

#82 DarklightCA

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Heavy Lifter
  • Heavy Lifter
  • 774 posts
  • LocationToronto, Ontario

Posted 21 January 2015 - 02:29 PM

View PostMechB Kotare, on 21 January 2015 - 02:15 PM, said:


Lol. Feel free to think that we need an average merc unit to take territories for "us". I dare you.


I never stated you needed a merc unit to take territories for you, I stated the fact that a merc unit took territories for you. There is a bit of difference between the two.

#83 Von Blumen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • LocationHuntress

Posted 21 January 2015 - 03:21 PM

View PostQueenBlade, on 17 January 2015 - 11:16 AM, said:



Mechwarrior Von Blumen, I would like to see where this "support" against your ally is?

Last night, 228th supported CJF on Waldorff defense.
Last night, 228th supported CGB on Hermagor defense.
Last night, 228th supported CSJ on the capture of Pesht and the assault on Itabaiana.

Even dropped with a group of JGx guys on the planet Itabaiana late in the night.

Once again it would seem the members of CSJ are quick to make assumptions, rather than provide facts.

If The B33f answers me back, I shall take back everything I said, but until then I stand by my statements...

#84 QueenBlade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2017 Bronze Champ
  • WC 2017 Bronze Champ
  • 711 posts

Posted 21 January 2015 - 03:30 PM

Then you stand by statements already proven false by your own faction members.

#85 Von Blumen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • LocationHuntress

Posted 21 January 2015 - 03:40 PM

View PostQueenBlade, on 21 January 2015 - 03:30 PM, said:

Then you stand by statements already proven false by your own faction members.

How many forums must be converted to this argument?
All I guess...no B33f, then we have beef...

But if we must, there is this little snippet that I find so interesting and yet not discussed...perhaps take this up with your partners...

...228th have been working with us for a good while now, however the CGB attacks were our idea from the beginning. We didn't expect them to help us full time, but we ultimately made a mistake in picking a faction riddled with stubborn people who stick to an alliance that clearly works in favor of CGB, MS and CI more then it does CSJ, but that isn't our problem anymore.

^Drunk Canuck from Jan 19th...but please continue this on the main argument page...or don't...don't care...I has Flying Whale...

Edited by Von Blumen, 21 January 2015 - 04:03 PM.


#86 QueenBlade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2017 Bronze Champ
  • WC 2017 Bronze Champ
  • 711 posts

Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:27 PM

We played together in the FRR faction, and we dropped matches together where there was no ceasefire agreements. You referencing this has no weight towards your statements made in this post.

#87 Vlad Ward

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Merciless
  • The Merciless
  • 3,097 posts

Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:47 PM

Drunk Canuck is a member of QQ Mercs, not 228.

#88 Von Blumen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • LocationHuntress

Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:51 PM

I know....that was the point....

Out of respect for the OP, I am bowing out of any more discussion on this topic here. This post was not made for this. Lukio I hereby apologize formally to you for this argument spreading to this forum. Say the word and I shall erase all posts.

#89 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 23 January 2015 - 09:08 PM

updated to remove Restless Adders who went JF.

#90 Volkodav

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 2,361 posts
  • LocationЯрославль. RDL.

Posted 24 January 2015 - 05:55 AM

We(RDL) + 28 day.

#91 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 24 January 2015 - 08:46 AM

YES!

#92 Prussian Havoc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander III
  • Galaxy Commander III
  • 1,066 posts
  • LocationShenandoah, PA

Posted 25 January 2015 - 02:53 AM

CPC is back with CSJ.
Gamed with them tonight against the Marik/Liao coordinated attack on Tarazed. (Full report available on Smoke Jaguar Alliance forums: http://www.smokealliance.com )

Edited by Prussian Havoc, 27 January 2015 - 06:12 AM.


#93 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 26 January 2015 - 09:18 PM

Yea, I'm trying to confirm Amary on the forums here is the same player trying to apply to SmokeAlliance.com.

#94 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 27 January 2015 - 10:01 AM

In addition to getting confirmation from Amary of CPC, I've also been contacted by Bloodshed Romance from a unit known as the Sea Wolves. Anyone know that unit?

Updated with DERP's permcon status.

#95 -Natural Selection-

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 1,631 posts
  • Locationdirty south

Posted 27 January 2015 - 02:44 PM

View PostLukoi Banacek, on 27 January 2015 - 10:01 AM, said:

Updated with DERP's permcon status.


This seemed fitting :P (though the Reservoir Dogs scene woulda been nice, just maybe not for the forums :) )



#96 Prussian Havoc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander III
  • Galaxy Commander III
  • 1,066 posts
  • LocationShenandoah, PA

Posted 28 January 2015 - 01:21 AM

View PostLukoi Banacek, on 27 January 2015 - 10:01 AM, said:

In addition to getting confirmation from Amary of CPC, I've also been contacted by Bloodshed Romance from a unit known as the Sea Wolves. Anyone know that unit?

Updated with DERP's permcon status.


I gamed with Bloodshed and one of his guys earlier tonight. Bloodshed mentions his 13-man Unit (5 of which are on quite regularly) was taking a 28-day contract.

Solid gamers, broadcast invitations to their private TeamSpeak at the start of each match.

I would game with them again anytime.

Edited by Prussian Havoc, 28 January 2015 - 01:41 AM.


#97 Prussian Havoc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander III
  • Galaxy Commander III
  • 1,066 posts
  • LocationShenandoah, PA

Posted 28 January 2015 - 11:09 AM

As it impacts Loyalist and loyal-to-CSJ Mercenary Corps Units alike I ask viewers to please review and comment on the following:


MERCENARY CORPS UNITS - RECOMMENDED CONSTRAINTS, RESTRAINTS, CONSEQUENCES AND REPERCUSSIONS
Started by Prussian Havoc, Today, 01:54 PM (http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__4144456)

Please check it out and add whatever comments you would like.

A well-reasoned and constructive debate could help provide Community feedback to PGI as they go about crafting CW Phase 3 and beyond.

Thank you in advance for your time and effort in reading this and considering it.

#98 Vlad Ward

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Merciless
  • The Merciless
  • 3,097 posts

Posted 30 January 2015 - 11:41 AM

Remnant is here for another 13.5 days.

#99 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 30 January 2015 - 02:15 PM

Thanks Vlad.

Also updated to show the Phanter Jäger from Germany as a permcon unit.

#100 Von Blumen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • LocationHuntress

Posted 30 January 2015 - 02:50 PM

See Vlad, we are not so bad once you get to know us...lol

Glad to have you boys back for another 2 weeks.

07

Edited by Von Blumen, 30 January 2015 - 02:51 PM.






5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users