Why No Multi-Core/threating Support
#1
Posted 25 December 2014 - 07:59 AM
is this the same with crossfire?
#2
Posted 25 December 2014 - 08:12 AM
#3
Posted 25 December 2014 - 08:16 AM
#4
Posted 25 December 2014 - 08:33 AM
it would make the game run so much smoother and if only they could enable crossfire as my 280x is going to waste and community warfare is killing my fps
#6
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:08 AM
#7
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:10 AM
Gabbatek, on 25 December 2014 - 07:59 AM, said:
is this the same with crossfire?
On the MWO launcher...
Click the "Gear" icon in the upper right.
Choose "Use 64-bit client."
Enjoy your multi-core support.
While playing yesterday, Lordred who frequently complains about the lack of the game using cores said he was impressed it got up to using 8 cores, however briefly.
Edited by Koniving, 25 December 2014 - 09:12 AM.
#8
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:11 AM
DjPush, on 25 December 2014 - 09:08 AM, said:
Its not AMD specific. MWO just hates more than one core. The AMD guys are particularly affected because of AMD's strategy of more cores vs single thread performance.
#9
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:18 AM
DeadMetal89, on 25 December 2014 - 09:04 AM, said:
Crossfire works with my oc'd 8320 and 2 asus r9 280's.
Did you try http://mwomercs.com/...sers-look-here/ ?
Also if you have msi afterburner disable ulps(Ultra low power state) it will help your frames a ton also disable v-sync.
#10
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:34 AM
#11
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:36 AM
Koniving, on 25 December 2014 - 09:10 AM, said:
Click the "Gear" icon in the upper right.
Choose "Use 64-bit client."
Enjoy your multi-core support...
^ THIS HELPS! ^
I am on a old (antique) AMD quad core system, and the 64bit option helped smooth out my gameplay.
My FPS used to dip into the red in heavy combat, but not anymore!
Edited by tredmeister, 25 December 2014 - 09:37 AM.
#12
Posted 25 December 2014 - 09:40 AM
El Bandito, on 25 December 2014 - 08:12 AM, said:
I fixed it for you.
And the 64 bit client, still doesnt support multi threading.
Its just 64bit.
And theres almost no advantage to it, other than it uses slightly more ram.
#13
Posted 25 December 2014 - 10:06 AM
#14
Posted 25 December 2014 - 10:45 AM
It IS using more than one core at a time. It's only when you have more than four cores that it doesn't improve performance (or if it does, it's very little improvement).
FYI, there are very few games that use more than three or four cores at a time. The current sweet spot is four cores. Maybe in five to ten years, games will actually need more than four cores, but no sooner than that.
#15
Posted 25 December 2014 - 10:47 AM
#16
Posted 25 December 2014 - 11:29 AM
Run perfmon /res and look at the CPU tab while it's running. If it's not using all your CPU you are likely GPU bound.
#17
Posted 25 December 2014 - 11:58 AM
The game needs a large dose of optimization and proper threading IMO.
#18
Posted 25 December 2014 - 12:01 PM
Deathlike, on 25 December 2014 - 11:58 AM, said:
The game needs a large dose of optimization and proper threading IMO.
Just think how many bugs we would get if they started this. I kind of hope they don't.
#19
Posted 25 December 2014 - 12:03 PM
Deathlike, on 25 December 2014 - 11:58 AM, said:
The game needs a large dose of optimization and proper threading IMO.
You can try to force anything you want.
Fact of the matter is, MWO, no matter how beast/ghetto your machine, will always run poorly.
It's just one of those games.
#20
Posted 25 December 2014 - 12:16 PM
Monkey Lover, on 25 December 2014 - 12:01 PM, said:
Starting what exactly?
FYI, the NVidia version has that option set to Auto, as the driver will determine on its own whether there are performance gains. Outside of that... it's a mystery to everyone.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users